Otoritas Pemahaman Hadis Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam: Kritik Ibn al-Labbād al-Mālikī Kepada asy-Syāfi’ī
Abstract
Understanding the hadith with different methods may have either the same result or different results, especially between ra’yu and hadith experts. The struggle for authority on understanding hadith makes this study more interesting because it involves understanding hadith itself, differences in schools of thought and which method is more authoritative in practicing a hadith. This paper discusses how Ibn al-Labbād criticized the hadith authority of as-Shafi’ī and the struggle for hadith authority and meaning. This paper uses a qualitative approach with literature review, and content analysis. The object of research in this paper is the work of Ibn al-Labbād (d. 333/944) along with his work in ar-Radd ‘alā as-Shāfi’ī. There are four categories of criticism by Ibn al-Labbād, they are: criticism of definitions, the causes of the appearance of hadith (asbāb al-wurūd), hadiths that are not fit with the verses of the Qur’an and laws that are not found in the hadith. Ibn al-Labbād’s critique of the interpretation of as-Shafi’ī is a proof that hadith text is not limited only to the understanding of the Shafi’ī school. Likewise, what was done by as-Shafi’ī also a proof so that the understanding of hadith is not only dominated and controlled by Malik.
Full text article
References
Abun-Nasr, Jamil M., ed. “The Call of the Minaret in the ‘West’: The Establishment of Islam in the Maghrib and Spain.” In A History of the Maghrib in the Islamic Period, 26–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608100.
Adela, Sofia. “Hak Kewarisan Zawil Arham (Perspektif Mazhab Hanafiyah Dan Syafi’iyah).” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, vol. 10, no. 2 (2018):. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v10i2.944.
Akmaluddin, Muhammad. “The Origin of Fiqh Schools in al-Andalus: From Qairawan to Medina.” International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.367255.
Aṣbaḥī, Mālik bin Anas al-. Al-Mudawwanah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1994.
Azami, M.M. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1978.
Baghdādī, Aḥmad bin ‘Alī al-Khaṭīb al-. Al-Riḥlah Fī Ṭalab al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1975.
Nurdiansyah, Rifqi, and Kaukabilla Alyaparangu. "Kaffārah Rules on Having Intercourse During Ramaḍān: Gender Analysis of Imam Nawāwī and Ibn Qudāmah’s Opinions." Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum 9, no. 1: 43-62.
Bosworth, C. E. The Islamic Dynasties. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1980.
Brockopp, Jonathan E. Muhammad’s Heirs: The Rise of Muslim Scholarly Communities, 622-950. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Callaway, Ewen. “Farming Invented Twice in Middle East, Genomes Study Reveals.” Nature, June 20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20119.
Dihlawī, Aḥmad bin ‘Abd al-Raḥīm al-. Al-Inṣāf Fī Bayān Asbāb al-Ikhtilāf. Edited by ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ Abū Ghuddah. Beirut: Dār al-Nafā’is, 1983.
Djawas, Mursyid, Misran Misran, and Cut Putrau Ujong. “‘Azl sebagai Pencegah Kehamilan (Studi Perbandingan antara Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafi’i).” El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, vol. 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v2i2.7657.
Fadl, Khaled Abou El. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. First Edition. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2001.
Fierro, Maribel. “Religious Dissension in Al-Andalus: Ways of Exclusion and Inclusion.” Al-Qanṭara, vol. XXII, no. 2 (2001).
Gallego-Llorente, M., S. Connell, E. R. Jones, D. C. Merrett, Y. Jeon, A. Eriksson, V. Siska, et al. “The Genetics of an Early Neolithic Pastoralist from the Zagros, Iran,” June 18, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/059568.
Ḥarrānī, Aḥmad bin ‘Abd al-Ḥalīm Ibn Taimiyyah al-. Ar-Radd ‘alā al-Syāżilī Fī Ḥizbaihi Wa Mā Ṣannafahū Fī Adāb al-Ṭarīq. Edited by ‘Alī bin Muḥammad al-’Umrān. Makkah: Dār ‘Ālam al-Fawā’id, 2008.
Ibn ‘Ābidīn, Muḥammad Amīn bin ‘Umar al-Dimasyqī. Radd Al-Muḥtār ‘alā al-Durr al-Mukhtār. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1992.
Ibn al-Hummām, Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Wāḥid. Fatḥ Al-Qadīr. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
Ibn al-Labbād, Muḥammad bin al-Labbād al-Qairawānī. Ar-Radd ‘alā asy-Syāfi’ī. Edited by ‘Abd al-Majīd bin Ḥamduh. Tunis: Dār al-’Arab, 1986.
‘Itr, Nūr al-Dīn. “I’jāz al-Nubuwwah al-’Ilmī.” In Al-Riḥlah Fi Ṭalab al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1975.
Jābirī, Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-. Isykāliyyāt Al-Fikr al-’Arabī al-Mu’āṣir. Beirut: Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-’Arabiyyah, 1990.
Jawābī, Muḥammad Ṭāhir al-. Juḥūd Al-Muhaddiṡīn Fī Naqd Matn al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī al-Syarīf,. Tunis: Mu’assasāt ‘Abd al-Karīm bin ‘Abd Allāh, 1991.
Khalīfah, Muṣṭafā bin ‘Abd Allāh Ḥājjī. Kasyf Al-Ẓunūn ‘an Asāmī al-Kutub Wa al-Funūn. Baghdad: Maktabah al-Muṡannā, 1941.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. California: SAGE Publications, 2004.
Kurniawan, M. H. Harry. “Penentuan Status Hukum Mafqud Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Imam Mazhab.” Al-Mursalah, vol. 2, no. 1 (2018). http://jurnal.staitapaktuan.ac.id/index.php/Al-Mursalah/article/view/72.
Lazaridis, Iosif, Dani Nadel, Gary Rollefson, Deborah C. Merrett, Nadin Rohland, Swapan Mallick, Daniel Fernandes, et al. “The Genetic Structure of the World’s First Farmers,” June 16, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/059311.
Makin, Al. Challenging Islamic Orthodoxy. Vol. 1. Popular Culture, Religion and Society. A Social-Scientific Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38978-3.
Mālikī, ‘Abd Allāh bin Muḥammad al-. Riyāḍ Al-Nufūs Fī Ṭabaqāt ‘Ulamā’ al-Qairawān Wa Zuhhāduhum Wa Nussākuhum Wa Siyar Min Akhbārihim Wa Faḍā’ilihim Wa Auṣāfihim. Edited by Basyīr al-Bakkusy. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1994.
Melchert, Christoph. “Sectaries in the Six Books: Evidence for Their Exclusion from the Sunni Community.” The Muslim World, vol. 82, no. 3‐4 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1992.tb03558.x.
Muranyi, Miklos. “Das Kitāb Aḥkām Ihn Ziyād Über Die Identifizierung Eines Fragmentes in Qairawān (Qairawāner Miszellaneen V).” Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, vol. 148, no. 2 (1998).
Nasir, Agus. “Social Distancing Dalam Saf Salat Berjamaah (Perbandingan Ulama Dalam Mazhab).” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, vol. 2, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14281.
Osman, Amr. The Ẓāhirī Madhhab (3rd/9th-10th/16th Century): A Textualist Theory of Islamic Law. Brill, 2014.
Qazwīnī, Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān al-. Al-Īḍāḥ Fī ‘Ulūm al-Balāghah. Edited by Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Mun’im Khafājī. Beirut: Dār al-Jīl, n.d.
Ṣabbāgh, Lamyā’ ‘Izz al-Dīn al-. “Al-Qairawān Multaqā al-Andalusiyyīn.” Majallah Al-Tarbiyah Wa al-’Ilm, vol. 18, no. 4 (2011).
Sanusi, Sandy Rizki Febriadi. “Kaidah Fikih: Sejarah dan Pemikiran Empat Mazhab.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam), vol. 4, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v4i2.6809.
Syāfi’ī, Muḥammad bin Idrīs al-. Al-Umm. Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1990.
Yaḥṣubī, Iyāḍ bin Mūsā al-. Tartīb Al-Madārik Wa Taqrīb al-Masālik. Edited by Ibn Tāwīt al-Ṭanjī, ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Ṣaḥrāwī, Muḥammad bin Syarīfah, and Sa’īd Aḥmad A’rāb. Maroko: Maṭba’ah Faḍālah, 1965.
Żahabī, Muḥammad bin Aḥmad al-. Tārīkh Al-Islām Wa Wafayāt al-Masyāhīr Wa al-A’lām. Edited by Basysyār ‘Awwād Ma’rūf. Tunis: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2003.
Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2008.
Ziriklī, Khair al-Dīn bin Maḥmūd al-. Al-A’lām. Beirut: Dār al-’Ilm li al-Malāyīn, 2002.
Authors
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication, i.e. this journal.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details, and publisher are identified.