Perluasan Kewenangan dan Penegakan Hukum Praperadilan di Indonesia dan Belanda
Abstract
This article examines the expansion of pretrial authority based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, which focuses on the philosophy of pretrial in the context of the protection of human rights and the comparison of pretrial enforcement in Indonesia and the Netherlands. This article is qualitative research by utilizing data sourced from the library (library research), this article uses several approaches, they are: legal approach, case approach, comparative approach and conceptual approach. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 is expected to bring hope, but there are still many problems that have occurred and have caused criticism. This post-decision pretrial was made with a more concrete formulation in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code and prioritized the interests of the suspect. This control effort emphasizes the principle of balance in the protection of human rights for suspects. This article concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUU-XII/2014 is expected to provide optimism, although there are still many obstacles that arise. As a recommendation, the House of Representative is expected to be able to draw up regulations regarding the expansion of pretrial authority at the investigation stage. Based on this, an integrated criminal justice system is needed and pretrial is still used in the draft KUHAP with a more explicit formulation that prioritizes the interests of the suspect.
Full text article
References
Abdussalam, R. Penegakan Hukum di Lapangan oleh Polri, Cet. Ke 1. Jakarta: Dinas Hukum Polri, 1997.
Afandi, Fachrizal. "Perbandingan Praktik praperadilan dan Pembentukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 28, no. 1 (2016): 93-106.
Afiah, Ratna Nurul., Praperadilan dan Ruang Lingkupnya, Jakarta: Akademia Pressindo, 1986.
Atmasasmita, Romli., Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1996.
Crijns, J.H., “Taak en positie van de rechter-commissaris in het nieuwe Wetboek van Strafvordering,” Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn THEMIS, Vol. 6, 2017.
Eddyono, Supriyadi W., et. al., Praperadilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah, dan Praktiknya, Jakarta: Institute For Criminal Juctice Reform, 2014.
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo dan Erasmus Napitupulu. Prospek Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam Pengawasan Penahanan Dalam Rancangan KUHAP, Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2014
Erwin, Muhammad., Filsafat Hukum, Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Faal, M., Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Polisi (Diskresi Kepolisian), Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1991.
Fedorova, Maria Igorevna., “The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Proceedings,” School of Human Rights Research Series, vol. 55, 2012.
Hamzah, Andi., Pengkajian Hukum Pencegahan Korupsi dan Hubungannya Dengan Transparansi Anggaran Pada Instansi Pemerintah, Jakarta: Depkumham RI, 2008.
Hamzah, Andi., Terminologi Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Hikmawati, Puteri., “Eksistensi Hakim Komisaris Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Analisis Terhadap RUU Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana),” Jurnal Kajian, vol. 18 No.1, 2013.
Ismail, Dian Ekawaty dan Yowan Tamu. "Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Melalui Mekanisme Praperadilan Di Kota Gorontalo." Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 21, no. 1 (2009): 81-92.
Kaurow, Glendy J., “Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana,” Lex Crimen, vol. IV no. 8, 2015.
Kusumastuti, Ely. "Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan." Yuridika 33, no. 1 (2018): 1-18.
Kwakman, N.J.M., “De nieuwe Wet versterking positie rechter-commissaris,” Trema, vol. 35 no. 35, 2012.
Lian Daya Purba, Tumian. "Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka." Papua Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2017): 253-270.
Loqman, Loebby., Pra Peradilan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
Luthan, Salman., Andi Samsan Nganro, dan Ifdhal Kasim., Praperadilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah, dan Praktiknya, Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2014.
Mansur, Dikdik M. Arief., dan Elisatris Gultom., Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma Dan Realita, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Muhaimin., “Keberadaan Hakim Komisaris Dan Transparansi Dalam Proses Penyidikan,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, vol. 16 no. 2, 2016.
Muhammad, Rusli., Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
Muladi., Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Malang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP, 1995.
P Moeliono, Tristam. "Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Kritikan terhadap Putusan MK tentang Praperadilan." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 22, no. 4 (2015): 594-616.
Plangiten, Maesa., “Fungsi Dan Wewenang Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia,” Lex Crimen, vol. II no. 6, (2013).
Prinst, Darwan., Hukum Acara Pidana; Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Djambatan, 1989.
Purba, Tumian Lian Daya., “Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka,” Papua Law Journal, vol. 1, no, 2 (2017).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 109/PUU-XIII/2015.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 21/PUU-XII/2014.
Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan No. 38/Pid.Prap/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Reglement Op de Strafvordering Vor de Raden van Justkie of Java En Het Hooggerechtshof van Indonesie, Stb.
Reksodiputro II, Mardjono., “Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Jurnal Lex Specialis, vol. 11 (2017).
Rumega, I Wayan Gede., “Hakim Komisaris Dan Miscarriage Of Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, vol. 19, no. 1 (2019).
Sabuan, Ansorie., et al., Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: Angkasa, 1990.
Satyayudhadananjaya, Nyoman., “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu (Integreted Criminal Justice System) Di Kaji Dari Perspektif Sub Sistem Kepolisian,” Vyavahara Duta vol. IX (2014).
Soekanto, Soerjono., Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1993.
Sofyan, Andi., Hukum Acara Pidana, Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2015.
Supriyanta., “KUHAP dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu,” Wacana Hukum, vol. 8, no. 1 (2009).
Syahrani, Riduan., Beberapa hal Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 1983.
The Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure.
Waruwu, Rifki Perdana Raya, “Praperadilan Pasca 4 Putusan MK,” Artikel, diakses dari https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/Praperadilan%20Pasca%204%20Putusan%20MK.pdf
Authors
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication, i.e. this journal.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details, and publisher are identified.