The Determination of Relevant Market on Islamic Financial Services Sector: Perspective of Indonesian Business Competition Law

Rifqi Ridlwan Nasir(1), Egi Hadi Kusnadi(2), Aziza Mutifani Hidayah(3)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada,
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada,
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Abstract

Abstract: After promulgation of Act Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of Financial Sector, sharia financing service businesses consisting of Sharia Banking, Sharia Public Economic Banks and Sharia Microfinance Institutions (LKMS) have financing products that tend to be the same. This is related to the definition of the relevant market in Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. This study aims to analyze the relevant market and to find potential of anti-competitive behavior in the financial services business. It is a normative juridical research using qualitative analysis. The method is summarized by examining regulations and doctrines related to Indonesian Business Competition Law. The results of this study explain that Sharia Banking, Sharia Public Economic Banks, and LKMS have same relevant market because the only difference is the financing scale. The Sharia Banking as dominant sector can influence the climate of business competition. Based on CR4 theory, the market concentration ratio in the Islamic financial services sector is a market that leads to loose oligopoly. There needs to be a limitation on the scale of financing regarding the maximum value of financing in Sharia Banking area and how much is in the area of LKMS to reduce the potential for abuse of dominance. But, rule of reason approach is still needed to find out the occurrence of violations caused by corporate action. The rule of reason approach used to assess corporate actions is in accordance with the maslahah mursalah concept.

 

Abstrak: Pasca diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan, pelaku usaha jasa pembiayaan syariah yang terdiri dari Perbankan Syariah, Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah, dan LKMS mempunyai produk pembiayaan yang cenderung sama. Mereka masih merupakan satu kesatuan dari iklim persaingan atau pasar yang bersangkutan. Hal ini terkait dengan pengertian pasar bersangkutan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pasar bersangkutan dan mengetahui potensi perilaku anti persaingan pada bisnis jasa keuangan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Metode tersebut dirangkum dengan mengkaji peraturan dan doktrin terkait Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Perbankan Syariah, Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah, dan LKMS mempunyai pasar bersangkutan yang sama karena yang membedakan hanyalah skala pembiayaannya. Perbankan Syariah sebagai sektor dominan dapat mempengaruhi iklim persaingan usaha di sektor jasa keuangan syariah. Berdasarkan teori CR4, rasio konsentrasi pasar pada sektor jasa keuangan syariah adalah pasar yang mengarah pada oligopoli longgar. Perlu adanya pembatasan skala pembiayaan terkait nilai maksimal pembiayaan yang menjadi wilayah Bank Syariah dan berapa yang menjadi wilayahnya LKMS untuk mengurangi potensi penyalahgunaan posisi dominan. Namun demikian, pendekatan rule of reason tetap diperlukan untuk mengetahui terjadinya pelanggaran yang diakibatkan oleh suatu aksi korporasi. Adapun pendekatan rule of reason yang digunakan untuk menilai aksi korporasi telah sesuai dengan konsep maslahah mursalah dalam Hukum Islam.

 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Act Number 1 of 2013 concerning Microfinance Institutions.

Act Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking.

Act Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking.

Act Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector.

Act Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies

Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.

Aji, Didik Kusno, "The Concept of Monopoly in a Review of Islamic Economics", Journal of Sharia Law and Economics, Vol. 13 No.2 (2013).

Anggraini, A.M. Tri, Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Tidak Sehat Per Se Illegal atau Rule of Reason, Jakarta: Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.

Arifin, Muhammad, Riza Aulia, and Nurul Azizah, “Analysis of Development Strategies in Competition for Islamic Microfinance Institutions in Aceh”, Scientific Journal of Students Islamic Economics and Business, Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022).

Arsyad, Lincoln dan Stephanus Eri Kusuma, Ekonomika Industri: Pendekatan Struktur, Perilaku, dan Kinerja, Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2014.

Constitution of the republic of indonesia 1945

Deanera, Princessa and Siti Anisah, “Relevant Market Analysis in KPPU Decisions (Study of Case Decisions Number 10/KPPU/-1/2016 and Number 13/KPPU-I/2019)”, Al-Adl Law Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, (2022).

Disyon, Huta, “Challenges to Law Enforcement of Business Competition in the Islamic Banking Industry”, Journal of Business Competition, Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022).

Fatah, Dede Abdul, Monopoly in Islamic Economics Perspective, Al-iqtisad, Vol.4 No. 2 (July, 2012).

Financial Services Authority Regulations Number 12/POJK.03/2021 Concerning Commercial Banks.

Financial Services Authority, December 2022 Sharia Banking Statistics, https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Documents/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2022/STATISTIK%20PERBANKAN%20SYARIAH%20-%20DESEMBER%202022.pdf, accessed on 27 June 2023, at 20.02.

Fiscal Policy Agency of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. “UU P2SK Officially Approved, First Steps to Reform of the Financial Sector”, https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/baca/2022/12/15/4378-uu-p2sk-resmi-disahkan-lan gkah-awal-reformasi-sektor-keuangan, accessed on 28 June 2023, at 19.20.

Fiscal Policy Agency of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. "P2SK Law Officially Approved, First Steps to Reform the Financial Sector". https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/baca/2022/12/15/4378-uu-p2sk-resmi-disahkan-lan gkah-awal-reformasi-sektor-keuangan, accessed on 1 August 2023, at 15.23.

Handayani, Otih, et al., “Relevant Market Analysis in Business Competition Law in the 4.0 Disruption Era (Online Business Versus Conventional Business)”, Soumatera Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020).

http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v3i2.5742

https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Sektor-Jasa-Keuangan-Terjaga-Stabil-dalam-Menghadapi-Peningkatan-Ketidakpastian-Global.aspx

https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/42437/t/Omnibus+Law+Sektor+Keuangan%2C+DPR+dan+Pemerintah+Sahkan+RUU+P2SK+Jadi+UU

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenal-perbankan-digital-dan-bank-digital-lt647683af1cb07/ , accessed on 15 July 2023, at 17.25.

https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/siaran-pers/Presiden-Sahkan-RUU-P2SK

Lubis, Andi Fahmi, et. al., Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks dan Konteks, Jakarta: GTZ, 2009.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

Nadirah, Ida, “Perspective of Business Competition Law on Mergers and Acquisitions of Companies in the New Normal Era”, SiNTESa Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1, (2021).

Naldi, Maurizio and Marta Flamini. “The CR4 index and the interval estimation of the HerfindahlHirschman Index: an empirical comparison”. 2014.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya, Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.

Posner, Richard A, Economic Analysis Of Law, Boston, Toronto, London: Little Brown and Company. 1992.

Regulation of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Number 3 of 2023 concerning Assessment of Mergers, Consolidations, or Acquisitions of Shares and/or Assets That May Lead to Monopolistic Practices and/or Unfair Business Competition.

Rohmat, “The Urgency of Establishing a Digital Market Law as an Instrument for Supervision of Business Competition in the Digital Age”, Journal of Business Competition Vol. 2, No. 2 (2022).

Sabirin, Ahmad and Raafid Haidar Herfian, “The Impact of Digital Ecosystems on Business Competition Laws in Indonesia and Optimizing the Role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in the Digital Economy Era”, Journal of Business Competition 1, No. 2 (2021).

Shandy, Andrew Utama, “Digitalization of Conventional Bank Products and Islamic Banks in Indonesi”", Journal of Law, Legislation and Social Institutions, Vol.6 No. 2 (2021).

Surya, Muhammad Mustariyakuma, “Juridical Review of Merger Notification in Business Competition Law: A Case Study of PT FKS Multi Agro TBK”, Journal of the Law Masters Program, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Volume 2 Number 1, (2022).

Syarifudin, Amir, Ushul Fiqh, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

Wibowo, Kodrat and Chandra Setiawan Ed., Two Decades of Business Competition Law Enforcement: Debates and Unresolved Issues, Jakarta: KPPU RI, 2021.

Authors

Rifqi Ridlwan Nasir
rifqi.ridlwan@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Egi Hadi Kusnadi
Aziza Mutifani Hidayah
Nasir, R. R., Kusnadi, E. H., & Hidayah, A. M. (2023). The Determination of Relevant Market on Islamic Financial Services Sector: Perspective of Indonesian Business Competition Law. Az-Zarqa’: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam, 15(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.14421/azzarqa.v15i2.3193
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details

How to Cite

Nasir, R. R., Kusnadi, E. H., & Hidayah, A. M. (2023). The Determination of Relevant Market on Islamic Financial Services Sector: Perspective of Indonesian Business Competition Law. Az-Zarqa’: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam, 15(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.14421/azzarqa.v15i2.3193