The Effectiveness of digital technology-based learning models on students' mathematical abilities

Main Article Content

Ade Susanti
Kamid
Syaiful
Nizlel Huda

Abstract

ABSTRACT


This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of implementing digital technology-based learning models in improving students' mathematical abilities in higher Education through systematic literature review. Mathematical skills are an essential competency needed by students in facing the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. However, data shows that students' mathematical achievement in various countries is still low. This study uses the systematic literature review method with the PRISMA protocol to identify, evaluate, and synthesize 47 research articles from Scopus and Sinta-indexed journals during 2018-2024. The analysis results showed that implementing digital technology-based learning, such as mobile application-assisted learning, adaptive learning systems, augmented reality, and game-based learning, could improve students' mathematical skills with an average effect size of 0.78 (strong influence). Significant findings indicate that personalized learning through adaptive technology substantially improves mathematical problem-solving capabilities.


In contrast, immersive technologies such as AR/VR effectively improve conceptual understanding of multivariable geometry and calculus materials. This research contributes in the form of a comprehensive mapping of various digital learning models and their optimal implementation contexts, as well as identifying opportunities for integrating big data and artificial intelligence in creating an adaptive mathematical learning ecosystem. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of implementing digital technologies and develop a pedagogical framework that optimizes the synergy between technology and constructivist approaches in mathematical learning in higher Education.


Keywords: Learning Model, Digital Technology, Mathematical Ability, Higher Education.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Effectiveness of digital technology-based learning models on students’ mathematical abilities. (2026). Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika (JPPM), 8(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2026.81.13-26

References

Aldon, G., Cusi, A., Schacht, F., & Swidan, O. (2021). Teaching Mathematics in a Context of Lockdown: A Study Focused on Teachers’ Praxeologies. Education Sciences, 11(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020038

Anggara, O. F., Rahmasari, D., Savira, S. I., Dewi, D. K., & Santi, M. (2024). The Effect of Using Augmented Reality to Lower Anxiety in Phobia Patients Pengaruh Penggunaan Augmented Reality untuk Menurunkan Kecemasan pada Penderita Fobia. 0672(c), 98–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v6i.535

Arztmann, M., Hornstra, L., Jeuring, J., & Kester, L. (2023). Effects of games in STEM education: a meta-analysis on the moderating role of student background characteristics. Studies in Science Education, 59(1), 109–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2057732

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945

Drijvers, P. (2020). Digital Tools in Dutch Mathematics Education: A Dialectic Relationship. In M. Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), National reflections on the Netherlands didactics of mathematics (pp. 177–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33824-4_10

Escueta, M., Nickow, A. J., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). Upgrading Education with Technology: Insights from Experimental Research. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(4), 897–996. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191507

Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

Fahrurrozi, F., Sari, Y., & Shalma, S. (2022). Studi Literatur : Implementasi Metode Drill sebagai Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(3), 4325–4336. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2800

Harikrishnan, H., Dayana Abd Halim, N., Harun, J., & Arjunan, S. (2019). Exploring the Digital Game-Based Elements in Mathematics Education: A Meta-Analysis Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071613

Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2021). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543

Hung, C.-M., Huang, I., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2–3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8

Isdayani.B, Thamrin, A. N., & Milani, A. (2024). Implementasi Etika Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Sistem Pendidikan dan Analisis Pembelajaran di Indonesia. Digital Transformation Technology, 4(1), 714–723. https://doi.org/10.47709/digitech.v4i1.4512

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

Koswara, A. (2024). Digitalisasi Ekonomi di Pedesaan: Mengkaji Kesenjangan Infrastruktur Digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Ilmu Sosial, 5(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.36722/jaiss.v5i3.3407

KPMG. (2019). Artificial intelligence perspectives on FATE in AI. A C-SUITE EXCHANGE ISSUES PAPER, November.

Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412

Lee, K., & Chan, C. K. (2023). Learning analytics in mathematics education: A critical review of empirical research. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0005

Manjani, N., Syahrial, S., & Mailani, E. (2024). PERSPEKTIF CALON GURU MENGENAI TANTANGAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI ERA DIGITAL. JGK (Jurnal Guru Kita), 8(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.24114/jgk.v8i2.56722

Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the Gateway for Digital Learning in Mathematics Education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7949

Nasman, P. A. dan D. P. (2024). Etika dan Pertanggungjawaban Penggunaan Artificial Intelegence di Indonesia. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10). https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/622/282

OECD. (2023). Pisa 2022 Results. In Factsheets: Vol. I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/

Opesemowo, O. A. G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education. 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch084

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rahayu, A. P., Nisak, H. K., Samuji, S., Wahib, A., & Besari, A. (2024). Inovasi Metode Pembelajaran Kolaboratif di Era digital: Studi Kasus Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Magetan. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(02), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i02.4450

Rahmawati, R., Nursalim, N., Alfiah, A., Hasyim, A., & Fawait, A. B. (2024). Impact of Using Big Data Analisys in Increasing Personalization of Learning. Journal of Computer Science Advancements, 2(2), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsca.v2i2.906

Rambe, N., Susilawati, & Harahap, M. (2024). Improving the Learning Outcomes of Islamic Religious Education Students with the Problem Based Learning Model at SD Negeri 27 Kotapinang. KOGNITIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(1), 149–156. Retrieved from https://journal.mgedukasia.or.id/index.php/kognitif/article/view/337

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Subroto, D. E., Supriandi, Wirawan, R., & Rukmana, A. Y. (2023). Implementasi Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang bagi Dunia Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan West Science, 1(07), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpdws.v1i07.542

Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008

Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2023). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761

Tene, T., Marcatoma Tixi, J. A., Palacios Robalino, M. de L., Mendoza Salazar, M. J., Vacacela Gomez, C., & Bellucci, S. (2024). Integrating immersive technologies with STEM education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1410163

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): a mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1

Wawan, W., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Berbasis Online Terintegrasi E-Akademik Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Sikap Terhadap Matematika. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(02), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.25217/jtep.v1i02.1760

Widodo, Y. B., Sibuea, S., & Narji, M. (2024). Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pendidikan: Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Personalisasi. Jurnal Teknologi Informatika Dan Komputer, 10(2), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.37012/jtik.v10i2.2324

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

World, E. forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020 | world economic forum. The Future of Jobs Report, October, 1163. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/digest

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542