RECONSTRUING URBAN MUSLIM ENTREPRENEUR PROGRAM ON VOLUNTARY ALMSGIVING: Deconstruction, Social Theology and Plurality
Main Article Content
Abstract
In social realm, the experience of religious communities has created diverse pious space in response to the elevating number of the urban poverty. Religious expression reduces the problem of poverty. The acts gave responses to modernity challenge, as pointed out in Weberian view, that characterized in selfish individualism and egocentrism. Sedekah as a concept of almsgiving sometimes correlated to the charity and philanthropy, but it also serves as complementary vision. This article seeks to employ the deconstruction of almsgiving program among the representative of Muslim urban entrepreneur. It aims at uncover the inspiration of voluntary almsgiving program in urban setting. Applying qualitative method, the article uses empirical secondary data found in both literature and netnography. Applying social theology approach that combined the hybrid theological and sociological ones, the argument exemplifies the alternative reading on sedekah program initiated by Jusuf Hamka, one of urban Muslim entrepreneurs. The article suggests the praxis of voluntary almsgiving program gave a way to inspiration that akin to active and equal traits amid diverse socio-religious practice and social classes. The deconstruction of sedekah program constitutes the pluralist view which is needed in a more democratic and diverse type of society in urban setting.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Amzaed, Ali M, Kamsi, A. Bahiej. 2021. “Saprah Amal, Democratization and Constitutional Rights:
The Habitus of Philanthropy Practices for the Banjar Muslim Society in South Kalimantan.”
As-Syir’ah 55(2).
Amin, Nasihun. 2009. Dari Teologi Menuju Teoantropologi. Semarang: Walisongo.
Arbi, Ivany Atina. 2021. ”Jusuf Hamka, Pengusaha Dermawan yang Jadikan 10 Hektar Tanahnya
untuk pemakaman Jenazah Pasien Covid-19.” Kompas.com, 28 Juli 2021.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., Akert, R.M., Sommers, S.R. 2016. Social Psychology. Boston: Pearson.
BPS. 2022. “Press Release: Persentase penduduk miskin.” www.bps.go.id, 17 Januari 2022.
Connolly Peter. 2006. Approaches to the study of religion. London: Continuum.
Dewi, Fitria I dan Azhari AT. 2022. “Optimalisasi Pendistribusian Dana Zakat, Infaq dan Sedekah
(ZIS) Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (Baznas) kabupaten Asahan.” Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah 7
(3).
Fathoni, Abdurrahmat. 2006. Antropologi Sosial Budaya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fridman, A., Gershon, R. dan Gneezy, A. 2022. “Increased generosity under COVID-19 threat.” Sci
Rep 12.
Hanum, S.Z. dan Zulhazmi. 2022. “Strategi Dakwah Muslimah di Perkotaan: Studi pada Komunitas
Humaira Surakarta.” Academic Journal of Da’wa and Communication 3 (1).
Haralambos, Michael. 1982. Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. Suffolk: The Chaucer Press.
Hogg, Michael A dan Joel Cooper. 2007. Social Psychology. California: Sage
Holthausen, Jannik. 2013. Scientific Review of the Social Exchange Theory and its contribution to solving
purchasers’decision making issues. Enschede: University of Twente.
Ibrahim, Azhar. 2014. “The need for discoursing social theology in Muslim Southeast Asia.” IJIMS:
Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 4 (1).
Kailani, Najib dan Slama M. 2019.”Accelerating Islamic charities in Indonesia: zakat, sedekah and the
immediacy of social media.” South East Asia 28 (1).
Kailani, Najib. 2021.”Creating entrepreneurial and pious Muslim subjectivity in globalised Indonesia.”
Dalam Rising Islamic Conservatism in Indonesia: Islamic Groups and Identity Politics. London:
Routledge.
Kartika, Siti Dewi. 2021. “Implementasi Sedekah Pada Pengembangan Usaha Mutashaddiq: Studi
Kasus Upzis NU Care Lazisnu Ranting Gempollegundi Kecamatan Gudo Kabupaten Gudo
Kabupaten Jombang.” Ulumul Syar’i 1 (1).
Maulana, M.I. dan Fikriyah. 2020. “Analisis Pengelolaan Zakat, Infaq dan Sedekah Untuk
Meningkatkan Ekonomi Dhuafa Pada Masjid Al Muhajirin Perumahan BSP Mojokerto.” Jurnal
Ekonomika Dan Bisnis Islam 3 (3).
Puteri, Alfi Salima. 2021.”Bos Jalan Tol Jusuf Hamka Jualan Nasi Kuning Rp.3000 Buat Kaum Dhuafa.”
Dream.co.id, 20 Desember 2021.
Rahmat, Abdi dan Umar Baihaqki. 2018. “The Role of Network for Alternative School: The Ways
Indonesian CSOs Manage Networking to Support Their Agenda on Education.” Indonesian
Journal of Sociology and Education Policy 2 (1).
Safitri, Eva. 2018. “Pedagang Ini Sediakan Nasi Kuning Rp. 3000 Bahkan Gratis untuk Dhuafa.” Detik.
com.
Setiawati, Rini. 2018. ”Manajemen ZIS (Zakat, Infak, Sedekah) Dalam Pembinaan dan Pengembangan
Potensi Anak Yatim di Yayasan Yatim Mandiri Lampung.” Komunika 1 (1).
Sneddon, J.N., Evers, U., dan Lee, J.A. 2020. “Personal Values and Choice of Charitable Cause: An
Exploration of Donor’s Giving Behavior.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 49 (4).
Wiepking, P. 2021. “The Global Study of Philanthropic Behavior.” Voluntas 32.
Weber, Max. 1998. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit Capitalism. California: Roxbury.