Apologi Teologis atas Ibn'Arabi : Analisis Kritis Kitab Al-Yawaqit wa al-Jawahir fi 'Aqaid al-Akabir Karya Imam Sya'rani
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.v21i2.3240Keywords:
Al-Yawaqit wa al-Jawahir fi ‘Aqaid al-Akabir, Apology, Futuhat al-Makkiyyah, Ibn ‘Arabi, Imam Sya’raniAbstract
Ibn ‘Arabi is a great sufi master in the history of Islam that is often misunderstood and revered and yet defended in theological matters. One of the Islamic scholars who defended Ibn ‘Arabi in theological context was Imam Abdul Wahhab Asy-Sya’rani. His book, entitled al-Yawaqit wa al-Jawahir fi Bayan ‘Aqaid al-Akabir, contained a script beetwen kalam and tasawuf especially an apology of Imam Sya’rani that to defense Ibn ‘Arabi according to the Futuhat al-Makkiyyah. This reseacrh focuses on the study of the book by critical analysis of the apology or defense of Imam Sya’rani over Ibn ‘Arabi in theological context, esepecially on the problem of tanzih (trancendece) and tasybih(immanence). The urgency of this study to show the dialectic of both Islamic discourses, kalam and tasawuf, which intertwined with each other and open a dialogue space beetwen of two. Hence, this study uses a theological approach with critical analysis method. The author of the study then found that : First, Al-Yawaqit wa al-Jawahir indicates that Imam Sya’rani in tanzih and tasybih more like a Ibn ‘Arabi’s synthesis or harmonization either. Second, the theological apology of Imam Sya’rani which defense Ibn ‘Arabi is more apologetic and justifical with jawab wa su’al response pattern as the mutakallim.
References
Ad-Dausyi, Musa bin Sulaiman. Rasail wa Fatawa fi Dzamm Ibn ’Arabi Ash-Sufiiy. Madinah al-Munawarah: Wizarat al-A’lam, 1989.
Almirzanah, Syafa’atun. When Mystic Masters Meet: Paradigma Baru dalam Relasi Umat Kristiani-Muslim. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.
Almond, Ian. Sufism and Deconstruction: A Comparative Study of Derrida and Ibn ’Arabi. 0 ed. Routledge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694503.
Arberry, A.J. Sufism : An Account of Mystics Islam. New York: Routledge, 2008.
Azdajic, Dejan. “Longing for the Transcendent: The Role of Love in Islamic Mysticism with Special Reference to al-Ghazālī and Ibn al-ʿArabī.” Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 33, no. 2 (April 2016): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378815595237.
Bagir, Haidar. Epistemologi Tasawuf : Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka, 2017.
Bahtiar, Azam. “Ibn ’Arabi : Antara Pemuja dan Penghujatnya.” Jurnal Bayan 5, no. 02 (2016).
Biqa`i, Ibrahim b. `Umar al-, and `Abd al-Rahman al-Wakil. Masra` al-tasawwuf aw Tanbih al-gabi ila takfir Ibn `Arabi. al-Riyad: Riasat Idarat al-Buhut al-`Ilmiyya wa-al-Ifta, 1994.
Bistara, Raha. “Wahdah Al-Wujud Ibn Arabi Dalam Imajinasi Kreatif Henry Corbin.” Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Phylosophy 1, no. 1 (April 4, 2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v1i1.2344.
Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-ʻArabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press, 1989.
Chodkiewicz, Michel. An Ocean without Shore: Ibn ʻArabî, the Book, and the Law. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.
Corbin, Henry, Moh Khozim, Suhadi, and Nurul Huda S. A. Imajinasi Kreatif Sufisme Ibn ’Arabi. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2002.
Endo, Haruka. “A Preliminary Outlook on Al-Shaʻrānī’s Defence of Ibn ʻArabī and the Intellectual Milieu during Early Ottoman Egypt.” Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies 8, no. 3 (March 16, 2015). https://doi.org/10.14989/198361.
Ernst, Carl W. Sufism : An Introduction to The Mystical Tradition of Islam. Boulder: Shambala, 2016.
Fazeli, Seyyed Ahmad. Mazhab Ibn ’Arabi : Mengurai Paradoksialitas Tasybih dan Tanzih. Translated by Muhammad Nur Jabir. Jakarta: Sadra Press, 2016.
Huda, Miftahul. “Epistemologi Tasawuf dalam Pemikiran Fikih Al-Sya’rani.” Ulumuna 14, no. 2 (2010): 25.
Hudson, Leila. “Reading Al-Shaʿrani: The Sufi Genealogy of Islamic Modernism in Late Ottoman Damascus.” Islamic Studies 15, no. 1 (2004): 31.
Ibn ’Arabi. Futuhat al-Makkiyyah. Edited by Abdul Aziz Sultha Al-Manshub. Kairo: Al-Majlis al-A’la li ats-Tsaqafah, 2017.
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. “Al-Shaʿrānī’s Response to Legal Purism: A Theory of Legal Pluralism.” Islamic Law and Society 20, no. 1–2 (2013): 110–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0004A0004.
Iqbal, Imam. “Logika Keilmuan Kalam: Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 16, no. 2 (October 1, 2015): 187. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i2.997.
Jafari, Fereshteh. “Theological Knowledge in Islamic Mysticism and Gnosticism” 6, no. 2 (2020): 18.
Kars, Aydogan. “Two Modes of Unsaying in the Early Thirteenth Century Islamic Lands: Theorizing Apophasis through Maimonides and Ibn ‘Arabī.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74, no. 3 (December 2013): 261–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9381-2.
———. “What Is ‘Negative Theology’? Lessons from the Encounter of Two Sufis.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfx025.
Kurt, Erkan. “Historical Characterization of Kalam.” Kelam Arastirmalalri 11, no. 1 (2013): 13. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-057-01-2005-05_2.
Marzouqi, Hassan. “Tariqa Islam: Layers of Authentication.” Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies, 2021, 54.
Muttaqin, Entol Zaenal. “Theological Debates On Ash’ariyya Tenets;” AL-QALAM 34, no. 2 (2017): 28.
Muzairi, and Novian Widiadharma. “The Doctrine of Logos Within Ibn ’Arabi Mystical Philosophy.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 18, no. 2 (Oktober 2017).
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Three Muslim Sages: Avicenna, Suhrawardī, Ibn ʻArabī. Delmar, N.Y: Caravan Books, 1976.
Noer, Kautsar. Ibn Al-’Arabi : Wahdat al-Wujud Dalam Perdebatan. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1995.
Putra, Andi Eka. “Tasawuf, Ilmu Kalam, dan Filsafat Islam.” Al-Adyan 7, no. 2 (Desemeber 2012): 12.
Shah-Kazemi, Reza. Paths to Transcendence: According to Shankara, Ibn Arabi, and Meister Eckhart. Spiritual Masters--East and West Series. Bloomington, Ind: World Wisdom, 2006.
Shahzad, Qaiser. “Ibn ’Arabī’s Theory of Divine Roots and the Question of God and Ten Categories.” Islamic Studies 51, no. 4 (2021): 16.
Shaqaqi, Hossein. “Negative Theology; A Comparative Study on Ibn Arabi and Eckhart.” Preprint. Preprints, January 14, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161065945.58838205/v1.
Subaidi. Abdul Wahab Asy-Sya’rani : Sufisme dan Pengambangan Pendidikan Karakter. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba, 2015.
Sya`rani, `Abd al-Wahhab ibn Ahmad ibn `Ali al-Ansari al-. al-Yawaqit wa-al-Jawahir fi Bayan `Aqaid al-Akabir. Bayrut: Dar al-kutub al-`ilmiyyat, 2007.
Zaini, Muhammad. “Methods and Thoughts in the Islamic Theology.” Al-Lubb: Journal of Islamic Thought and Muslim Culture (JITMC) 2, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 93. https://doi.org/10.51900/lubb.v2i2.8595.
Zamzami, Mukhammad. “Rekonstruksi Pemikiran dan Posisi Sufi-Antisufi Ibn Taymīyah.” Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2017): 30–63. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2017.7.1.30-63.
Zuhri. Pengantar Studi Islam. Yogyakarta: FA Press, 2016.
———. Pengantar Studi Tauhid. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2013.
Zulhelmi. “Epistemologi Pemikiran Muktazilah : Pengaruhnya Terhadap Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam di Indonesia.” JIA 14, no. 2 (December 2013).