Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32Keywords:
Droptail, NS-2, TCP Newreno, TCP Vegas, Packet Data QueuingAbstract
TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.
References
Brakmo, L. S., & Peterson, L. L. (1995). TCP Vegas: end to end congestion avoidance on a global Internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8), 1465–1480. https://doi.org/10.1109/49.464716
Chaudhary, P., & Kumar, S. (2017). A Review of Comparative Analysis of TCP Variants for Congestion Control in Network. International Journal of Computer Applications, 160(8), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017913087
Domański, A., Domańska, J., Pagano, M., & Czachórski, T. (2016). The Fluid Flow Approximation of the TCP Vegas and Reno Congestion Control Mechanism. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 659, pp. 193–200). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47217-1_21
Fajri, M. (2016). Simulasi Antrian Paket Data Jaringan dengan Mekanisme Drop Tail. Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO, 8(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.22441/fifo.v8i2.1310
Hasanul Fahmi. (2018). Analisis Qos (Quality of Service) Pengukuran Delay, Jitter, Packet Lost Dan Throughput Untuk Mendapatkan Kualitas Kerja Radio Streaming Yang Baik. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 7(2), 98–105.
Kembuan, O. (2016). Analisa Packet Loss Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) RENO pada Jaringan Intranet Menggunakan NS2 (Network Simulator). Engineering Education Journal (E2J-UNIMA), 4(3), 24.
Kumar, A., Sharma, A. K., & Singh, A. (2012). Comparison and Analysis of Drop Tail and RED Queuing Methodology in PIM-DM Multicasting Network. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 3(2), 3816–3820.
Kurata, K., Hasegawa, G., & Murata, M. (2000). Fairness comparisons between TCP Reno and TCP Vegas for future deployment of TCP Vegas. INET Conferences, 1–20.
Orueta, G. D., Ruiz, E. S. C., Alonso, N. O., & Gil, M. C. (2016). Quality of Service. In Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks (pp. 200–221). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13094-7
Pamungkas, G. W., Yahya, W., & Nurwarsito, H. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas Dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Random Early Detection Dan Droptail. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (J-PTIIK), 2(10), 3239–3248.
PERFSONAR. (2020). Lab 6 : Bandwidth-delay Product and TCP Buffer Size.
Pratama, T., Irwansyah, M. A., & Yulianti. (2015). Perbandingan Metode PCQ, SFQ, RED Dan FIFO Pada Mikrotik Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Layanan Jaringan Pada Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tanjungpura. Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(3), 298–303.
Susandi, H., & Pinem, M. (2014). Analisis Kualitas Layanan Data pada Jaringan Telekomunikasi Berbasis CDMA EVDO Rev . A. Jurnal Singuda Ensikom, 6(2), 93–98.
Syaifuddin, M., Andika, B., & Ginting, R. I. (2016). Analisis Celah Keamanan Protocol TCP/IP. Jurnal Ilmiah Sains Dan Teknologi (SAINTIKOM), 16(2), 130–135.
Taruk, M., & Ashari, A. (2016). Analisis Throughput Varian TCP Pada Model Jaringan WiMAX. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.15529
Taruk, M., & Setyadi, H. J. (2016). Analisis Mekanisme Penanganan Kemacetan (Congestion Control) pada Algoritma Varian. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Komputer (KONIK), 1–4.
Torkey, H., Attiya, G., & Z. Morsi, I. (2012). Modified Fast Recovery Algorithm for Performance Enhancement of TCP-NewReno. International Journal of Computer Applications, 40(12), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.5120/5018-7351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dony Fahrudy, Bambang Sugiantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms as stated in http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
