Abstract
Implementation is one of phases in Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). A programmer is a software development leader decides whether software is completed on time or postpone according to development schedule. Data Warehouse and IT Center (PTIPD) is a software developer official vendor in UIN Sunan Kalijaga, they developed a growing number of software to facilitate administrative processes in college academic community. This is an analysis to determine the factors that most influence the developers. The object of this research are nine people. They are all software programmer in PTIPD. The research using Mixed Methods Research that combines two methods of research, qualitative and quantitative. Two factors from previous research are factors materialistic and non-materialistic factors. Materialistic factors are Reward and Punishment; Career Development and Contra-Accomplishment, Incentive and Bonus. Non-Materialistic factors are Usefulness, Relationships and Spirituality. Preliminary data taken from interviews, observation and documentation study to discover object opinions and views. Validity Test and Reliability Test using SPSS software for qualitative data is provided. The most influencing factor for performance of SDLC programmers of PTIPD UIN Sunan Kalijaga is Usefulness with the highest values are on three informants: Oscar, Bravo, and Mike, also Relations with the highest values are on three informant: Delta, Sierra, and Zulu.References
Pressman, R., Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak: Pendekatan Praktisi. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, (Terjemahan ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2007.
Kalijaga, P. U., “Pusat Teknologi Informasi & Pangkalan Data UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://it.uin-suka.ac.id/page/content/1-sekilas-pksi.html.
Tresnasari, N. A. Implementasi Model Penjaminan Mutu pada Organisasi Pengembang Perangkat Lunak Skala Kecil (Studi Kasus: PKSI UIN Sunan Kalijaga). Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2012.
Irvine, D., “The Role of Tangible vs. Intangible Rewards in Strategic Recognition,”2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.recognizethisblog.com/2009/05/the-role-of-tangible-vs-intangib le-rewards-in-strategic-recognition/
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. I., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W., Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D., Effect of Leader Contingent and Noncontingent Reward and Punishment Behaviours on Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction, Academy of Management, 810-821.
Jayanti, Novita Dwi., Peran Reward dan Punishment Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Pada Bank (Studi Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Malang). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2014.
Kinjerski, Val, and Skrypnek, Berna J., Measuring The Intangible: Development of the Spirit at Work Scale. Handbook of Faith and Spirituality in the Workplace: Emerging Research and Practice. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5233-1_23, 383-399, 2006.
Duchon, Dennis & Plowman, Donde Ashmos, “Nurturing the Spirit at Work: Impact on Work Unit Performance,” Leadership Quarterly, 16, 807-833, 2005.
Bogdan, R. a., “Introduction to Qualitative Research Method – A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences,” Qualitative Sociology, 183-192, 1990.
Moleong, L., Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.
IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License