Internet Access Equity Policy Is the Internet Access Equity Policy Through USO Funds effective?

Rossi Adi Nugroho; Binti Azizatun Nafi'ah

doi:10.14421/ijid.2019.08102

Internet Access Equity Policy Is the Internet Access Equity Policy Through USO Funds effective?

Rossi Adi Nugroho, Binti Azizatun Nafi'ah

Abstract

Indonesia has a disparity in internet access caused by differences in regional factors, especially in geographically difficult areas to reach. The disparity in internet access is narrowed by the existence of programs through USO funds. However, the researchers found that the equalization program for internet access using USO funds had not been effective, especially in the education sector. This paper aims to provide an evaluation of USO-funded programs. This paper uses qualitative descriptive methods with review literature data collection techniques accompanied by qualitative critical analysis techniques. The important finding of this study is that the internet access equalization program has not been effective as evidenced by the ineffectiveness of this program in the education sector. Researchers suggest optimizing the internet access equalization program through USO funds to improve the quality of education.

Keywords

collaborative; governance; USO funds; ICT; education

Full Text:

PDF

References

http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/01/03/16514421/2018-jokowi-ingin-pemerintah-fokus-tingkatkan-sdm retrieved September 29, 2018

Kharisma, Bayu. 2013. Impact of School Operational Assistance (BOS) Program on School Dropouts in Indonesia: DID Analysis. http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/JEP/article/view/4942

Laksana, Ben KC. 2012. Education on fringe in Indonesia. https://www.newmandala.org/44323-2/

Kemdikbud. 2017. Ikhtisar Data Pendidikan dan kebudayaan 2017/2018. Pusat data dan statistik pendidikan dan kebudayaan Jakarta

Nikolic, et al. 2018. Appraisal and review of e-learning and ICT systems in teaching process. PhysicaA: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications.

Tvenge, N., and Matinsen, K. 2016. Selection of ICT-tools for Manufacturing Education. Procedia 41 1096-1100

Umar and Hassan. 2015. Malaysian Teachers Levels of ICT Integration And Its Perceived Impact On Teaching and Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 197

Scriven. 2000. Science in Elementary Education. New York : John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., Freeman, H.E. (2004) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Chen. 2004. Bring Character Education into Classroom. European Journal of Educattional Research Vol. 1, No. 2 (2012), pp: 163-170.

Gibson, M. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan ke dua. Jakarta: Erlangga.

https://www.uny.ac.id/berita/peran-tik-dalam-meningkatkan-kualitas-pembelajaran. retrieved October,1 2018

UNESCO “ITC in Education” May 16, 2011. Available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/icts/mission/

https://itstillworks.com/role-information-communication-technology-education-1419.html retrieved October 1, 2018

Siahaan, sudirnan (2010). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran. Jakarta : Pustekkomdiknas

Goncalver, et al. Understanding individual-level digital divide: Evidence of an African. Computer in Human Behavior. 87 p. 276-291

Dewan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298–337.

Rondinelli, Dennis A., James S. McCullough, and Ronald W. Johnson. 1989. “Analyzing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: A Political-Economy Approach.” Development and Change 20, 1: 57-87

Dijk, Van. 2006. The Network Society. London: SAGE Publications

Ansell, Chris and Alison Gash. 2007. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 18(4). 543-571. https://sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2011/05/Ansell-and-Gash-Collaborative-Governance-in-Theory-and-Practice.pdf

Hogue, Teresa. 2003. Building Collaboration, Stronger Families Learning Exchange. Bulletin No. 3 p.6-8 diakses dari http://www.aifs.gov.au/sf/pubs/bull3/rm/html tanggal 7 oktober 2018

Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi, Stephen Balogh. 2011. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Jurnal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://uncgcollaborativecapacity.wikispaces.com/file/view/J%20Public%20Adm%20Res%20Theory-2011-Emerson-jopart-mur011.pdf/264887156/J%20Public%20Adm%20Res%20Theory-2011-Emerson-jopart-mur011.pdf

http://marketeers.com/bakti-butuh-dana-uso-demi-pemerataan-akses-telekomunikasi/ retrieved maret 10, 2019

Thompson, Perry and Miller. 2007. Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration. Jurnal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published December 1, 2007 in Partnering with the Senior’s Sectors”. Local Government Sudies. 38 (2). 161-181.

Goldsmith, Stephen. And Eggers, William D. 2004. Governing by network. Brookings Institution Press.

https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/13310/2018-bakti-targetkan-dana-uso-rp-27-triliun/0/sorotan_media retrieved october, 7 2018

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2019.08102