Study Of Legal Positivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v8i2.2133Keywords:
study, legal positivism, rational, philosophyAbstract
This article is a result of study that aims to explain the importance of the thought of legal positivism. The rapid development of science and technology can cause problems in life. The demands of the necessities of life to be fulfilled by human beings. Therefore, the development of legal positivism as a legal discipline closely related to the rational method of legal thinking becomes very important. There are various issues that require assertiveness and legal certainty to solve them. Understand how laws in legislation are important in law science, because law embraces the principle of legality in the system of state positive law norms. The study method used is literature with philosophical approach. From the results of the study shows that the study of legal positivism is very important to understand the law in writing in the legislation. Deductive that became characteristic in the method of reasoning legal positivism to get a correct understanding of the law of the general provisions established in the legislation. Rational-based legal positivism is very useful to establish the degree of legal certainty.
References
Andrei Marmor, Exclusive Legal Positivism, The Oxford Hand Book of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford Press, 2002.
Brian Z. Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Cynthia Nicoletti, Writing The Social History Of Legal Doctrine, Buffalo Law Review, Vol.64, 2016.
David Dyzeinhaus, Shopia Reibetanz Moreau and Arthur Ripstein, Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, 2007.
Erica Newland, Executive Orders in Court, The Yale Law Journal, Vol.124, 2015.
Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law on State, Translated by Anders Wedberg, New York, Russell & Russell, 1961.
Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory Of Law, Translated by Max Knight, Berkeley , Los Angeles, London University of California Press, 1967.
H.L.A. Hart, The Concept Of Law, London, Oxford University Press, 1972.
Hari Chand, Modern Jurisprudence, Selangor Darul Ehsan Malaysia, International Law Book Services, 1994.
John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Cambridge, University Press, 1995.
John F. Manning, Second-Generation Textualism, California Law Review, Vol.98, 2010.
Joshua Revesz, Ideological Imbalance and the Peremptory Challenge, The Yale Law Journal, Vol.125, 2016.
Kennet Einar Himma, Inclusive Legal Positivism, Oxford hand Book Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Ludwing von Wiittgenstein, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.
M.D.A. Freeman, Llyod Introduction to Jurisprudence, London, Sweet Maxwell, 2001.
M.R. Zafer, Jurisprudence an Outline, Kuala Lumpur, International Law Book Services, 1984.
Philip P. Frickey, Getting from Joe to Gene (McCarthy): The Avoidance Canon, Legal Process Theory, and Narrowing Statutory Interpretation in the Early Warren Court, California Law Review, Vol.93, 2005.
Richard A. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990.
Ronald Dworkin, Hart’s Posthumous Reply, Harvard Law Review, Vol.130, 2017.
Stanley L. Paulson, On Kelsen’s Place in Jurispruden, Intruduction to Hans Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992.
Thomas B. Nachbar, The Rationality Of Rational Basis Review, Virginia Law Review, Vol.102, 2016.
W. Friedman, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Press, 1990.
W. Friedman, Legal Theory, New York, Columbia University Press, 1967.
W. Friedman, Legal Theory, Trans. M. Arifin, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1993.
