ANALISIS KALIMAT BERDASARKAN POLA KALIMAT DASAR DAN KALKULUS PREDIKAT

Penulis

  • Siti Ainim Liusti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15203

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the sentences based on the basic sentence patterns of Indonesian and predicate calculus. These approaches put the predicate as a core component in the sentence structure. The object of study is focused on declarative sentences of Indonesian. The data analysis consists of several stages. Basic sentence patterns of Indonesian consist of identifying the type of sentences, identifying the elements forming sentences, and putting on elements which are based on basic sentence patterns of Indonesian. Predicate calculus consists of identifying atomic or compound propositions, determining the predicate and other components, defining a form of expression predicate calculus, and making a notation function. The results showed that the basic sentence pattern analysis only identifies the internal elements in a single sentence, while the predicate calculus can as well identifies the internal elements of a single or compound sentence.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Alecu, Felician. 2014. Declarative Programming in PROLOG. Economics of Knowledge, 6.1, 32-38.

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., Moeliono, & A.M. 1998. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Perum Balai Pustaka.

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., Moeliono, & A.M. 2003. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Perum Balai Pustaka.

Arifin, Zaenal dan Junaiyah. 2009. Sinksis. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Chaer, Abdul. 2007. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chomsky, Noams. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Djajasudarma, Fatimah. 2006. Metode Linguistik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ekowardono, B. Karno. 2002. Kalimat Dasar Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Tentang Ciri dan Tipenya. Dalam Alwi, Hasan dan Dendy Sugono. Telaah Bahasa dan Sastra. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Galton, Anthony. 2006. Operator VS Arguments. The Ins and Outs of Reification. Synthese. 150.3, 415-441.

Kesuma, Tri Mastoyo Jati. 2005. Realisasi Kategorial dan Semantis Fungsi Keterangan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Humaniora, Vol. 17, No.3, 261-276.

Kristanto, Andri. 2004. Kecerdasan Buatan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Oliver, A., & Smiley., T. 2006. A Modest Logic of Plural. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 35, 317-348.

Samsuri. 1985. Tata Kalimat Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Sastra Husada.

Santrock, J. W. 2014. Psikologi Pendidikan: Educational Psychology. Edisi 5. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Soesianto, F. & Dwijono, D. 2006. Logika Matematika untuk Ilmu Komputer. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Sukini. 2010. Sintaksis: Sebuah Panduan Praktis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Susandhika, I. G. N. M., Laksana, I. K. D., & Suparwa, I. N. 2016. Fungsi,Kategori, dan Peran Sintaksis dalam Talk Show One “Indonesia Lawyers Club” di TV One. Linguistika, Vol. 23 (44), 20-36.

Tallant, Jonathan. 2010. There’s No Existent like ‘No Existence’ Like No Existent I Know. Philosophical Studies. 148 (3), 387-400.

Diterbitkan

2016-12-19

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

ANALISIS KALIMAT BERDASARKAN POLA KALIMAT DASAR DAN KALKULUS PREDIKAT. (2016). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15203

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama