Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/kjc.11.02.2019Keywords:
Indonesian Ulema Council, Islam Nusantara, Mass Media, Online Media Framing AnalysisAbstract
This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.
Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.
Abstract viewed: 493 times
|
PDF downloaded = 1058 times
References
Studi Epistemologis dan Kritis. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 15(2), 265–292.
Azra, A. (1998). Jaringan Ulama Timur Tengah dan Kepulauan Nusantara Abad XII dan XVII. Bandung: Mizan.
Bleyer, W. G. (2015). How To Write Special Feature Articles. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bungin, B. (2008). Konstruksi Sosial Media. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Burbules, N. ., & Torres, C. . (2000). Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Craig, R. (2005). Online Journalism; Reporting, Writing, and Editing for New Media. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Deddy, M. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Entman, R. (2004). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis Framing: Konstruksi Ideologi dan dan Politik Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Gillespie, A. (2007). Current issues in Indonesian Islam: Analysing the 2005 council of Indonesia ulama fatwa No. 7 opposing pluralism, liberalism, and secularism. Journal of Islamic Studies, 18(2), 202–240.
Huda, N. (2013). Islam Nusantara Sejarah Sosial Intelektual Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ichwan, M. N. (2016). MUI, Gerakan Islamis, dan Umat Mengambang. Ma’arif Institute, 87–104.
Karim, A. M. (2007). Islam Nusantara. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher.
Luthfi, K. M. (2016). Islam Nusantara: Relasi Islam dan Budaya Lokal. SHAHIH: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v1i1.53
Makin, A. (2017). Nabi-Nabi Nusantara Kisah Lia Eden dan Lainnya. Yogyakarta: Suka-Press.
McLuhan, M. (1996). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mubarok, A. A., & Rustam, D. G. (2018). Islam Nusantara: Moderasi Islam di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 3(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.21580/jish.32.3160
Munfaridah, T. (2017). Islam Nusantara Sebagai Manifestasi Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) dalam Mewujudkan Perdamaian. Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 4(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v4i1.1476
Ninian, S. (2003). The Global Future of Religion”. In Mark Juergensmeyer (Ed.), Global Religion: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pribadi, Y. (2019). Identity Contested: Cultural Resilience in the Midst of Islamization of Politics. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 56(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2018.562.255-280
Ricklefs, M. C. (Merle C. (1991). Islam in the Indonesian social context. Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.
Ricklefs, M. C. (Merle C. (2012). Islamisation and its opponents in Java : a political, social, cultural and religious history, c. 1930 to the present. NUS Press.
Romli, M. G. (2018). Akar-akar Historis dan Geografis Islam Nusantara. Retrieved November 15, 2018, from www.gunromli.com website: https://www.gunromli.com/2018/07/akar-akar-historis-dan-geografis-islam-nusantara/
Sahal, A., & Aziz, M. (2015). Islam Nusantara: Dari Ushul Fiqih Hingga Konsep Historis. Bandung: Mizan.
Salam, A. (2018). The Hoax Phenomenon in Indonesian Society: Observing Anti-Diversity Memes since 2014. Jurnal Humaniora, 30(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i3.38891
Salim, A. (2013). Javanese religion, Islam or syncretism: comparing Woodward’s Islam in Java and Beatty’s Varieties of Javanese Religion. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 3(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v3i2.223-266
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfi eld, J., & Bartlam, B. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualisation and operationalisation. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.
Sobur, A. (2009). Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotika, dan Analisis Framing. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Stephens, M. (1998). The Rise of the Image, the Fall of the Word. USA: Oxford University Press.
Tjandrasasmita, U. (2009). Arkeologi Islam Nusantara. Jakarta: Penerbit KPG.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
