Viral Humanitarian Imagery: The Impact of #AllEyesonRafah on Global Social Media Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/kjc.71.04.2025Keywords:
Viral Humanitarian Imagery, Global Social Media Dynamics, Social Network, Representation, Medium is the MessageAbstract
This study examines the impact of viral humanitarian imagery, focusing on the AI-generated image campaign with the hashtag #AllEyesonRafah on global social media dynamics. It explores how the imagery influences public awareness and encourages responses to humanitarian issues in Rafah, Palestine. The study aims to identify a pattern linking social media use to social mobilization driven by humanitarian imagery. Data were collected through analysis of digital content posted by public figures and humanitarian organizations, employing a qualitative approach informed by relevant communication theories. Primary sources included posts by public figures such as Bella Hadid, Ariana Grande, and Paramore, which significantly increased engagement. The analysis integrates three theories: Mark Granovetter’s Social Network Theory to examine the viral spread of AI-generated imagery on platforms like X, Instagram, and TikTok; Stuart Hall’s Representation Theory to analyze global public interpretations of these images; and Marshall McLuhan’s “Medium is the Message” Theory to assess how social media platforms and visual formats shape perception of the Rafah crisis. Findings indicate that viral humanitarian imagery not only raises awareness but also drives tangible global audiences. The study confirms social media’s role as an agent of social change, with its novelty lying in the detailed explanation of emotions in visual communication. The limitations of this study include the focus on one aspect of social media and the lack of longitudinal analysis, while suggestions for further research include a broader exploration of audience interactions and offline dimensions of similar phenomena.
Abstract viewed: 286 times
|
PDF downloaded = 172 times
References
Amelia, L. T. D., & Balqis, N. R. (2023). Changes in communication patterns in the digital age. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 544–556.
Anam, M. K., & Masuwd, M. A. (2025). Digitalization Process in Islamic Business: Literature Review . Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management, 4(2 SE-Articles), 166 – 184. https://doi.org/10.31538/mjifm.v4i2.325
Ara, A., Alam, M. S., & Mifa, K. A. F. (2024). A comparative review of ai-generated image detection across social media platforms. Global Mainstream Journal of Innovation, Engineering & Emerging Technology, 3(01), 11–22.
Chouliaraki, L., & Vestergaard, A. (2021). Introduction: Humanitarian communication in the 21st century. Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication, 1–22.
Donahoe, E. P., Staggs, J., & Vargas, D. (2023). Employing Customizable Digital Observation Tools to Support Classroom-Focused Pedagogical Partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(2), 124–141.
Dunnell, K., Agarwal, G., Pataranutaporn, P., Lippman, A., & Maes, P. (2024). Ai-generated media for exploring alternate realities. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–8.
Esau, K., Choucair, T., Vilkins, S., Svegaard, S. F. K., Bruns, A., O’Connor-Farfan, K. S., & Lubicz-Zaorski, C. (2024). Destructive polarization in digital communication contexts: a critical review and conceptual framework. Information, Communication & Society, 1–22.
Etter, M., & Albu, O. B. (2021). Activists in the dark: Social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations. Organization, 28(1), 68–91.
Feher, K. (2024). Exploring AI media. Definitions, conceptual model, research agenda. Journal of Media Business Studies, 21(4), 340–363.
Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2017). Social networks and innovation. In The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 327–341). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ferreira, C., & Gonçalves, G. (2022). Remaining Useful Life prediction and challenges: A literature review on the use of Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63, 550–562.
Fraccastoro, S., Gabrielsson, M., & Pullins, E. B. (2021). The integrated use of social media, digital, and traditional communication tools in the B2B sales process of international SMEs. International Business Review, 30(4), 101776.
Frijns, H. A., Schürer, O., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2023). Communication models in human–robot interaction: an asymmetric MODel of ALterity in human–robot interaction (AMODAL-HRI). International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(3), 473–500.
Graben, P. R., Schall Jr, M. C., Gallagher, S., Sesek, R., & Acosta-Sojo, Y. (2022). Reliability analysis of observation-based exposure assessment tools for the upper extremities: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10595.
Granovetter, M. (1976). Network sampling: Some first steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1287–1303.
Granovetter, M. (1990). The myth of social network analysis as a special method in the social sciences. Connections, 13(1–2), 13–16.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35(1), 3–11.
Granovetter, M. (2018). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 46–61). Routledge.
Granovetter, M. (2023). The Strength of Weak Ties. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 79–91). Routledge.
Granovetter, M., Castilla, E., Hwang, H., & Granovetter, E. (2000). Social networks in silicon valley. The Silicon Valley Edge, 218–247.
Grewal, D., Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., & Ordenes, F. V. (2022). The future of digital communication research: Considering dynamics and multimodality. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 224–240.
Griffin, R. (2023). Rethinking rights in social media governance: human rights, ideology and inequality. European Law Open, 2(1), 30–56.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285.
Hall, S. (1989). Cultural identity and cinematic representation. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, 36, 68–81.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (Vol. 2). Sage.
Hall, S. (2006). New ethnicities. In Stuart Hall (pp. 453–462). Routledge.
Hall, S. (2020). The work of representation. In The applied theatre reader (pp. 74–76). Routledge.
Hamilton, R. J. (2022). Platform-Enabled Crimes: Pluralizing Accountability When Social Media Companies Enable Perpetrators to Commit Atrocities. BCL Rev., 63, 1349.
He, X., & Fang, L. (2024). Regulatory Challenges in Synthetic Media Governance: Policy Frameworks for AI-Generated Content Across Image, Video, and Social Platforms. Journal of Robotic Process Automation, AI Integration, and Workflow Optimization, 9(12), 36–54.
Hsiao, J.-C., Chen, S.-K., Chen, W., & Lin, S. S. J. (2022). Developing a plugged-in class observation protocol in high-school blended STEM classes: Student engagement, teacher behaviors and student-teacher interaction patterns. Computers & Education, 178, 104403.
Hutchinson, J. (2021). Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(1), 35–51.
Jahid, A., Alsharif, M. H., & Hall, T. J. (2022). A contemporary survey on free space optical communication: Potentials, technical challenges, recent advances and research direction. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 200, 103311.
Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Pian, W. (2022). Chatbot as an emergency exist: Mediated empathy for resilience via human-AI interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103074.
Junaedi, A. T., Renaldo, N., Yovita, I., Veronica, K., & Sudarno, S. (2023). Digital culture as a moderating factor in increasing digital literacy. Reflection: Education and Pedagogical Insights, 1(3), 116–127.
Killen, H., Chang, L., Soul, L., & Barclay, R. (2022). Combining physical and digital data collection for citizen science climate research. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1).
La Rose, T., & Detlor, B. (2021). Social work digital storytelling project: Digital literacy, digital storytelling, and the makerspace. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(6), 599–609.
Lacarcel, F. J., & Huete, R. (2023). Digital communication strategies used by private companies, entrepreneurs, and public entities to attract long-stay tourists: a review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(2), 691–708.
Lawrence, S., & Hylton, K. (2022). Critical race theory, methodology, and semiotics: The analytical utility of a “race” conscious approach for visual qualitative research. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(3), 255–265.
Lee, F. L. F., Liang, H., Cheng, E. W., Tang, G. K. Y., & Yuen, S. (2022). Affordances, movement dynamics, and a centralized digital communication platform in a networked movement. Information, Communication & Society, 25(12), 1699–1716.
Lee, S. Y., Lim, J. R., & Shi, D. (2024). Visually framing disasters: Humanitarian aid organizations’ use of visuals on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(3), 749–773.
Lewis, K. (2023). Colonising the narrative space: Unliveable lives, unseeable struggles and the necropolitical governance of digital populations. Information, Communication & Society, 26(12), 2398–2418.
Li, L. (n.d.). Ai for Content Generation: Automating Journalism, Art, and Media Production. Art, and Media Production.
Lu, Z., Huang, D., Bai, L., Qu, J., Wu, C., Liu, X., & Ouyang, W. (2023). Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking human and model perception of ai-generated images. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 25435–25447.
Luhuringbudi, T., Syamsuddin, M. D., & Hakim, S. A. (2019). Activists communication dynamics for mobilization of minority politics in europe. International Journal of Communication and Society, 1(2), 43–57.
Martikainen, J., & Hakoköngäs, E. (2023). Drawing as a method of researching social representations. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 981–999.
McLuhan, M. (2017). The medium is the message. In Communication theory (pp. 390–402). Routledge.
McLuhan, M. (2019). The medium is the message (1964). In Crime and media (pp. 20–31). Routledge.
Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Wischnewski, M., & Meinert, J. (2021). The development of connective action during social movements on social media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 4(1), 1–21.
Mwita, K. (2022). Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies. Available at SSRN 4889752.
Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567.
Neilson, B., Marty, T., & Daley, N. (2024). Revising data collection methodology-evidence from the Australian financial sector. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 10, 100131.
Ng, R., Rivera, M. C. S., Cook, M., Mavilidi, M. F., & Bennett, S. (2025). Co-researching with primary school students to retrace their digital footprint. Computers & Education, 224, 105170.
Ongenaert, D., Joye, S., & Ihlen, Ø. (2023). Manufacturing Humanitarian Imagery: Explaining Norwegian Refugee Council’s Public Communication Strategies Toward the Syrian and Central African Crises. International Journal of Communication, 17, 3799–3821.
Ongenaert, D., Joye, S., & Machin, D. (2023). Beyond the humanitarian savior logics? UNHCR’s public communication strategies for the Syrian and Central African crises. International Communication Gazette, 85(2), 164–190.
Peña, A. M., & Gold, T. (2023). The party-on-the-Net: the digital face of partisan organization and activism. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3257–3274.
Rodriguez-Lopez, J. M., Schickhoff, M., Sengupta, S., & Scheffran, J. (2021). Technological and social networks of a pastoralist artificial society: Agent-based modeling of mobility patterns. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1–27.
Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130–143.
Setiawan, D., Masuwd, M. A., Maliki, N., Laily, I. F., & Fitriyani, Y. (2023). Impact of Digital Storytelling for Developing Oral Communication Skills, Digital Literacy, and Learning Motivation Among Pre-service Elementary Teachers. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 2(2), 34–42.
Srai, J. S., Graham, G., Van Hoek, R., Joglekar, N., & Lorentz, H. (2023). Impact pathways: unhooking supply chains from conflict zones—reconfiguration and fragmentation lessons from the Ukraine–Russia war. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(13), 289–301.
Walsh, J. P., & Hill, D. (2023). Social media, migration and the platformization of moral panic: Evidence from Canada. Convergence, 29(3), 690–712.
Wang, X., Sun, Y., & Ding, D. (2022). Adaptive dynamic programming for networked control systems under communication constraints: A survey of trends and techniques. International Journal of Network Dynamics and Intelligence, 85–98.
Wasielewski, A. (2024). Unnatural Images: On AI-Generated Photographs. Critical Inquiry, 51(1), 1–29.
Whang, S. E., Roh, Y., Song, H., & Lee, J.-G. (2023). Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: A data-centric ai perspective. The VLDB Journal, 32(4), 791–813.
Zhang, Y., Love, D. J., Krogmeier, J. V, Anderson, C. R., Heath, R. W., & Buckmaster, D. R. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of future rural wireless communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 59(12), 16–22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Teguh Luhuringbudi; Fitri Liza; Edi Kurniawan, Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd, Safa Husayn Alrumayh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
