Financial Arbitration: Comparative Perspectives on Islamic and Common Law Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jbmib.2025.0402-06Keywords:
Islamic finance, sharia law, arbitration, common law, regulatory framework, dispute resolution, sharia-compliance contractsAbstract
ABSTRACT
Research Aims: This paper aims to examine arbitration as a bridge between Islamic finance and international arbitration standards, identifying key areas of convergence and divergence and proposing harmonised solutions that uphold Sharia compliance while ensuring international enforceability.
Design/methodology/approach: It evaluates Islamic arbitration frameworks, such as the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) Sharia Standard on Arbitration and the Asian International Arbitration Centre’s (AIAC, formerly KLRCA) i-Arbitration Rules, against established international benchmarks, including the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law and the New York Convention.
Research Findings: The analysis highlights key areas of convergence and divergence, revealing the complexities of integrating Sharia-compliant dispute resolution within the global legal context.
Theoretical Contribution/Originality: The paper proposes practical strategies to harmonise Islamic arbitration practices with international norms, including clarifying and standardising Sharia principles, fostering wider acceptance of Islamic finance arbitration, and ensuring procedural compliance with Sharia and international arbitration frameworks. By doing so, the article argues that arbitration can provide an effective, credible, and globally compatible mechanism to resolve Islamic financial disputes.
Research limitations and implications: This study is limited by its focus on comparative legal frameworks, primarily drawing from doctrinal analysis and literature. Review rather than empirical data. Nonetheless, the findings provide practical insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and legal practitioners in designing harmonized arbitration frameworks that align Sharia principles with international commercial standards.
Downloads
Abstract viewed: 1 times
|
PDF downloaded = 0 times
References
REFERENCES
AAOFI, Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) (2017). Sharia Standard No. 32 on Arbitration. Manama.
AAOIFI. (2010). Governance Standards for Islamic Financial Institutions. Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions.
Adam, J. J. & Thomas, A. (2005). Islamic Bonds: Your Guide to Issuing, Structuring and Investing in Sukuk, London: Euromoney Books, 45–47.
AIAC, i-Arbitration Rules (2nd edn., Kuala Lumpur, 2021); DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, Accreditation for Islamic Finance Arbitrators.
Al-Amine, M. M. (2012). Islamic Finance and the Role of Arbitration in Resolving Disputes, Kluwer Law International, 62–64.
Al-Dareer, S. M. (1997). Al-Gharar in Contracts and Its Effect on Contemporary Transactions, Islamic Research and Training Institute.
Al-Saati, A., (2003). The Permissibility of Arbitration in Islamic Law, Arab Law Quarterly 10(2), 125, 131.
Al-Suwaidi, M. (2020). Public Policy and Enforcement of Sharia-Based Arbitral Awards in the GCC States, Leiden: Brill, 46.
Ballantyne, W. (2006). Essays and Addresses on Arab Laws. Dubai International Arbitration Centre.
Bälz, K. (2002). Sharia and Common Law in Arbitration: Conflicts and Convergences, Arab Law Quarterly (17)3, 329–346.
Bantekas, I. (2021). Transnational Islamic Finance Disputes: Towards a Convergence with English Contract Law and International Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement.
Bhatti, M. (2019). Resolving Islamic Finance Disputes through Arbitration in the Middle East. In The Growth of Islamic Finance and Banking: Innovation, Governance and Risk Mitigation.
Blanke, G. (2020). Semi-Secular Arbitration in Islamic Banking and Finance Disputes: A Proposal. Arbitration.
Born, G. B. (2021). International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn), Kluwer Law International.
Coulson, N. J. (1964). A History of Islamic Law, Edinburgh University Press, 189–191.
DIAC Rules. (2019). Dubai International Arbitration Centre Arbitration Rules. Dubai.
El-Ashker, A. & Wilson, R. (2006). Islamic Economics: A Short History. Vol. 3. Brill.
El-Gamal, M. (2006). Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hamoudi, H. (2010). Islamic Law in Modern Courts. Aspen Publishers.
Hasan, Z., & Asutay, M. (2011). An Analysis of the Courts’ Decisions on Islamic Finance Disputes. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance.
Hassan, A. & Zeller, B. (2023). Arbitrating Financial Disputes: An Analysis between Common Law and Islamic Law. Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal (51)2.
Hassan, M. K., & Lewis, M. K. (2007). Handbook of Islamic Banking, 87.
Hegazy, W. (2011). Arbitration in Islamic Finance: Institutional and Capacity Challenges. Journal of Islamic Law and Society, 18(3).
Hisham, I. (n.d.) Sirah; Al-Tabari, M. J. (n.d.). Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk.
Ibrahim, A. A. (2008). The Rise of Customary Business in International Financial Markets. American University International Law Review, 23(4), 663.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), ICC Arbitration Rules 2021, Paris.
International Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA) (2001). Resolutions on Arbitration in Islamic Law. Jeddah: Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
Kamali, M. H. (1999). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Islamic Texts Society.
Kato, S. (2023). Resolution of Islamic Financial Disputes under Private International Law in Japan. In Changing Orders in International Economic Law Volume 1: A Japanese Perspective.
Kettani, F. (2022). Harmonisation of Islamic Finance and International Law. London: Routledge.
Kettani, F. (2022). Harmonisation of Islamic Finance and International Law, (London: Routledge, 97–101.
Labanieh, M. F., Hussain, M. A., & Mahdzir, N. (2019). Arbitration as a Mechanism to Resolve Islamic Banking Disputes in Malaysia: Challenges and Drawbacks. UUM Journal of Legal Studies.
Lew, J. D. M., Mistelis, L. A. & Kröll, S. M. (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 105–108.
London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), LCIA Arbitration Rules 2020, London.
Obaidullah, M. (2015), Islamic Financial Services, Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute, 212–214.
Olayemi, A. A. M. & al-Zabyani, B. K. (2014). Arbitration Clause in Islamic Banking Contracts: A Contractual Necessity 1(7).
Oseni, U. A., Hassan, M. K., & Ali, S. N. (2020). Judicial Support for the Islamic Financial Services Industry: Towards Reform-Oriented Interpretive Approaches. Arab Law Quarterly.
Oseni, U., Ahmad, A., & Hassan, M. (2018). Institutionalising Sharia-compliant Arbitration: Developments and Challenges. Journal of Arbitration Studies.
Owolabi, K. M. W. (2023). Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within Nigerian Law. Journal Hukum Novelty.
Redfern, A. & Hunter, M. (2015). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (6th edn) Oxford University Press, 201–203.
Sornarajah, M. (2021). The International Law on Foreign Investment (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Tamimi & Co. (2014). Islamic Finance and International Arbitration: Practical Challenges. Dubai.
Tamimi & Co. (2014). Law The Choice of Law and Dispute Settlement Resolution in Islamic Cross-Border Finance Transactions, Update.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), (1985, amended 2006). Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.
Usmani, M. T. (2002). An Introduction to Islamic Finance, Maktaba Ma’ariful Qur’an.
van den Berg, A. (2017). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation. Kluwer Law International.
Vogel, F. E. & Hayes, S. L. (1998). Islamic Law and Finance: Religion, Risk, and Return, Kluwer Law International.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Business Management and Islamic Banking
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
