Respon Para Disabilitas terhadap Komunikasi Krisis BPBD (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah) dan Tim SAR Klaten Tahun 2016

Authors

  • Raden Roro Driadelta Juneza Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Komunikasi dan Informatika Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v9i1.1192

Abstract

Abstrak

Bencana alam dapat terjadi kapan saja dan dimana saja, terutama di daerah yang rawan bencana seperti daerah pesisir pantai, lereng gunung berapi, dan lain sebagainya. Salah satu wilayah di Jawa Tengah yang rawan akan bencana adalah Kabupaten Klaten. Oleh sebab itu BPBD (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah) Klaten dan bekerjasama dengan tim SAR Klaten terus menerus menghimbau masyarakat akan sigap dalam menghadapi bencana. Masyarakat pada umumnya menyerap informasi yang disampaikan oleh BPBD dan tim SAR Klaten melalui komunikasi langsung ataupun melalui sosial media. Namun masyarakat yang mempunyai kebutuhan khusus seperti penyandang disabilitas memiliki cara tersendiri dalam berkomunikasi dan menyerap informasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survey. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survey dipilih karena mampu memaparkan bagaimana respon masyarakat melalui data yang diperoleh dari responden. Populasi dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 102 orang, setelah dihitung dengan rumus Slovin maka diperoleh sampel sebanyak 50 responden. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa respon masyarakat penyandang disabilitas sesuai dengan perhitungan olah data menunjukkan nilai mean sebesar 3.45 yang mengacu pada indikator ‘setuju’. Respon mereka terbilang baik serta mampu memberikan feedback yang positif kepada BPBD dan tim SAR Klaten.

Kata Kunci: komunikasi krisis, bencana, masyarakat disabilitas

 

Abstracts

Natural disasters can happen anytime and anywhere, especially in disaster-prone areas such as coastal areas, slopes of volcanoes, etc. One of the areas in Central Java will be prone to disaster is Klaten. Therefore, BPBD (Regional Disaster Relief Agency) Klaten and in cooperation with Rescue team Klaten continuously appealed to society will be sprightly in the face of disaster. The general societies areusually absorbing any information submitted by BPBD and Rescue team Klaten through direct communication or through social media. But the disabled community have certain own way to communicate and absorb information. This research uses a quantitative approach with survey methods for its ability to interpret community’s responses through questionnaires. Population in this study amounted to 102 peoples, as calculated by the Slovin’s the obtained sample of 50 respondents. The results indicate that response of disabled community in accordance with the calculation data shows the value of mean is3.45 and indicator of that value which refers to ' agree '. The community’s responses prove that they have positive feedback toward BPBD and Rescue team Klaten.

Keywords: crisis communication, disaster, disabilities people 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asuncion, J., Budd, J., & Fichten, C. (2012). Social Media Use By Students With Disabilities. Academic Exchange ..., 16, 30–35.

Bessonov, A. B. (2008). Communication processes: Role, Place, Content. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35(4), 159–171. http://doi.org/10.3103/S014768820804 0011

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Crisis Management and Communications. Institute for Public Relations, (1), 1–14. http://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/1234 56789/96

Endsley, T., Wu, Y., & Reep, J. (2014). The Source of The Story: Evaluating The Credibility of Crisis Information Sources. ISCRAM 2014 Conference Proceedings - 11th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 1(1), 160–164.

Hemingway, L., & Priestley, M. (2006). Natural Hazards, Human Vulnerability and Disabling Societies: A Disaster for Disabled People? Laura Hemingway & Mark Priestley Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds (UK).

Herri, S. (2014). Communication Skills “Sukses Komunikasi, Prestasi dan Berkarier!” Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Jennifer, L., Glen, W., & Michael, H. (2007). Emergency Response Training Practices for People With Disabilities : Analysis of Some Current Practices and Recommendations for Future Training Programs. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(4), 216–222.

Kapucu, N. (2007). Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters, 16(4), 551–561. http://doi.org/10.1108/096535607108170 39

Kriyantono, R. (2010). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Kurhajcová, L. (2010). Effective Communication During the Crisis Situation, 2(2), 229–234.

Laajalahti, A., Hyvärinen, J., & Vos, M. (2016). Crisis Communication Competence in Co-Producing Safety with Citizen Groups. Social Sciences, 5(13), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.3390/socsci40x000x

Masozera, M., Bailey, M., & Kerchner, C. (2006). Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups : A case study of New Orleans, 3, 299– 306. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006. 06.013

Nee, R. C., & Fusco, J. (2015). Tweets During Crisis Follow One-Way Communication. Newspaper Research Journal, 36(2), 197–211. http://doi.org/10.1177/0739532915587 295

Parsons, B. S., & Fulmer, D. (2007). The Paradigm Shift in Planning for Special- Needs Populations, 1–9.

Purworini, D. (2016). Komunikasi Krisis dalam Konflik Internal Karaton Surakarta Hadiningrat. Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.

Purworini, D., & Sugiyanti, A. (2012). Motif Personal Branding Mahasiswa UMS di Facebook. Journal of KomuniTi, 4(9), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110741 5324.004

Rahman, B. a. (2012). Issues of Disaster Management Preparedness : A Case Study of Directive 20 of National Security Council Malaysia. Int. Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(5), 85–92.

Richard Eiser, J., Bostrom, A., Burton, I., Johnston, D. M., McClure, J., Paton, D., ... White, M. P. (2012). Risk Interpretation and Action: A Conceptual Framework for Responses to Natural Hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 1(1), 5–16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.0 02

Richardson, B. K., & Byers, L. (2004). Communication Studies and Emergency Management: Common Ground, Contributions, and Future Research Opportunities for Two Emerging Disciplines, 1–28.

Ronoh, S., Gaillard, J. C., & Marlowe, J. (2015). Children with Disabilities and Disaster Risk Reduction : A Review. International Journal Disaster Risk, 38–48. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13753- 015-0042-9

Schalick, W. O. I. I. I., Westbrook, C., & Young, B. (2012). Communication with Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychiatric Disabilities: A Summary of the Literature. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper, 1– 49.

Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K., Burke, J. M., & Seeger, M. W. (2007). Media Use and Information Needs of the Disabled During a Natural Disaster, 18, 394– 404.

Stough, L. M., Sharp, A. N., Decker, C., & Wilker, N. (2010). Disaster Case Management and Individuals With Disabilities, 55(3), 211–220. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020079

Website Resmi SAR Klaten. (n.d.).

White, G. W., Investigator, P., Fox, M. H., Rooney, C., & Coordinator, P. (2007). Final Report Nobody Left Behind. Research and Training Center on Independent Living The University of Kansas, (July).

Downloads

Published

2016-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles