ANALYSIS OF FEEDBACK GIVING PRACTICE AMONG JUDGES OF BONGO STAR SEARCH PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v13i2.1688Keywords:
Feedback, Bongo Star SearchAbstract
Human beings need feedback all the time so as to improve and (or) maintain certain behaviour. However, not every feedback can help one improve or maintain his/her behavior, unless they are appropriately given in a way they are constructive. Much of informal learning on different life aspects including feedback giving practices is done through media. As participants in media programs or viewers, we are much influenced by whatever goes on in the media. Consequently, there is high need to ensure media practices are appropriate so that they can influence the society in a very positive manner. This study analyses feedback giving practices among judges of Bongo Star search program using feedback giving principle. The data used in this study are video clips of BSS in 2015 episode 10. Results show that Bongo Star Search judges with regard to feedback giving principle did not observe the relevant principles to large extent and with regard to the feedback giving principle, they did not observe the principle description to a relatively large extent. Accordingly, the study calls for training among judges of Bongo Star Search on how to give effective feedback.Downloads
References
Arnold, J. (2009). Coaching Skills for Leaders in the workplace:How to develop, Motivate and Get the Best from your Staff. UK: HowtoBooks.
Barach, W., & Paranjape, A. (2002). Feedback and Reflection: Teaching Methods for Clinical settings. Academic Medicine, 77, 1185-1188.
Brinko, K. (1993). The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve teaching: What is effective? The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574-593.
Brookhart, H. (2008). How to Give Feedback to Your Students. Alexandria: Association for Supervison and Curriculum Development.
Caron, P., & Gely, R. (2004). Taking Back the Law school Classroom: Using Technology to Foster Active Student learning Journal of Legal Education, 54, 551-569.
Chua, C., & Mosha, H. (2015). Managing School Internal Mechanism for Performance Improvement in Secondary School Education: Case of Six Secondary School in Eastern Zone in Tanzania. Sage open, 1-9.
Cohen, W. (1975). Lifelong Learning-A Definition and Challene. USA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Folkman, J. (2006). The Power of Feedback: 35 Principles for Turning Feedback from Others into Personal and Professional Change. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .
Gorrell, P., & Hoover, J. (2009). The Coaching Connection: A Manager's Guide to Developing Individual Potential in the Context of Organization. New York: American Management Association.
Hathaway, P. (1990). Giving and Receiving Feedback: Building Constructive Communication. USA: Crisp Publoication
Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing Learning through Formative Assesment and Feedback. London: Routledge.
Junining, E. (2014). A Critique on Giving Feedback for English as Foreign Language (EFL) Students' Writing. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2, 31-34.
Komba, A. (2015). Marking and Giving Feedback on Pupils' Class Assignments in Tanzania Primary Schools: Implications for Pupils' learning. Journal of Education and Literature, 3, 159-168.
Kothari (Ed.) (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2 ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
Kyaruzi, F. (2012). Effectiveness of Basic mathematics Continous Assesment Feedback in Secondary School in Tanzania: The Case of Schools in Coast and Dares salaam Regions. Journal of Education, Humanities and Sciences, 1, 51-62.
London, M. (Ed.) (2003). Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,.
McCabe, D., & Meuter, M. (2011). A Student View of Technology in Classroom: Does it Enhance the Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education? Journal of Marketing Education, 2, 149-159.
Mwipopo, M. (2007). Effectiveness of Teacher Oral Feedback in ESL/EFL Classroom: A Case Study. (Masters), University of Regon, USA.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative Assesment and Self regulated learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. 31, 199-218.
Sebonde, R. (2013). Handling of Morpho-Syntactic Leaners Errors in Tanzania English Language Classrooms. Journal of Language teaching and research, 4, 1191-1199.
Tuck, J. (2012). Feedback Giving as Social practice: Teachers perspectives on Feedback as Institutional Requirement, Work and dialogue. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 209-221.
Vella, J. (2002). Learning to Listen, Learning to Teach: The Power of Dialogue in Educating Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
