ONLINE JOURNALIST IDEALISM IN BANDUNG RAYA WITHIN HOAX VORTEX

Darajat Wibawa

Abstract


Mass communication messages can be produced individually using internet facilities that can be accessed using various gadgets today. Everyone can be to send of any communication message to the public, including hoax message. The hoax is information or messages that are not supported by facts and data, so that is lie and cannot be justified. Hoax are made to confuse the atmosphere, attack and bring down others To day hoax can be  compete with communication message produced by any mass media, and any where including journalists in the Bandung Raya. This study aims to examine the idealism of online media journalists in the Bandung Raya area in the hoax vortex, so it takes of data in the form of opinions from online media journalists in Bandung Raya. Therefore, the appropriate research method in this research is descriptive method. Descriptive method seeks to describe the phenomenon or object of research in accordance with what is in the field. Therefore, the most appropriate approach to constructing opinions and experiences experienced by researchers and informants is a qualitative approach. The guiding theories in this research are social action theory, phenomenology and symbolic interaction theory which are also supported by concepts relevant to this research. Through interviews to journalists, the research results show that hoaxes for online media journalists in the Greater Bandung area can provide both positive and negative aspects to journalists' idealism.

Keywords


Communication, Journalist, Hoax.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A., & Puspitasari, L. (2018). MEDIA TELEVISI DI ERA INTERNET. ProTVF, 2(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.24198/ptvf.v2i1.19880

Amalliah, A. (2018). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Fenomena Hoax Di Media on Line Pada Era Post Truth. In Jurnal Akrab Juara (Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 1–15). http://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/392

Anisah, N. (2018). Survei Indeks Kemerdekaan Pers Indonesia 2018. Dewan Pers.

Christiany Juditha. (2018). Interaksi Komunikasi Hoax di Media Sosial serta Antisipasinya Hoax Communication Interactivity in Social Media and Anticipation. Jurnal Pekommas, 3(1), 31–44. https://www.neliti.com/publications/261723/hoax-communication-interactivity-in-social-media-and-anticipation-interaksi-komu

Craib, I. (1997). Social constructionism as a social psychosis. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031001002

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Aproaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208956

Dharmasaputra. (2011). Jurnalisme Online: Asal Seru dan Seru? Dewan Pers, 4.

Faedlulloh, D., & Duadji, N. (2019). Birokrasi dan Hoax: Studi Upaya Menjaga Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara di Era Post-Truth. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i3.566

Fensi, F. (2018). FENOMENA HOAX : Tantangan terhadap Idealisme Media & Etika Bermedia. Bricolage : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 133–209. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/bricolage

Ishwara, L. (2011). Jurnalisme Dasar. Jakarta: Buku Kompasta.

Jensen, E. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak: Paradigma Pengajaran Bary. Indeks.

Kominfo. (2019). 771 Hoax Berhasil Diidentifikasi Kemkominfo Sejak Agustus 2018 Hingga Februari 2019. Kominfo.

Kertamukti, Rama. (2019). Instagram Dan Pembentukan Citra (Studi Kualitatif Komunikasi Visual dalam Pembentukan Personal Karakter Account Instagram @basukibtp). http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/isoshum/profetik/article/view/1101

Manan, B. (2016). Pers, Hukum, dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Dewan Pers.

Marliah, E. D. (2020). Research For Social Justice. In Taylor and Prancis Gruop.

Muliawanti, L. (2018). JURNALISME ERA DIGITAL: DIGITALISASI JURNALISME DAN PROFESIONALITAS JURNALISME ONLINE. LENTERA: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21093/lentera.v2i1.1168

Mulyana, D. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. In Bandung: PT remaja Rosdakarya.

Mustika, R. (2018). ETIKA BERKOMUNIKASI DI MEDIA ONLINE DALAM MENANGKAL HOAX. Diakom : Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi, 1(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v1i2.30

Nugroho, B. (2013). Pers Berkualias, Masyaraka Cerdas. Dewan Pers.

Praseyo, Y. (2018). Hoax. Etika, September, 2–3.

Priyambod, R. (2017). Dalam Jurnalisme Rakyat Tetap Berdaulat. Dewan Pers, 15.

Rahmon, A. dkk. (2017). Merawat Kemerdekaan Pers dengan Objekivitas. Dewan Pers.

S. Nasution. (2016). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah. In Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Santroek, J. W. (2011). Psikologi Pendidilkan (Kedua). Kencana.

Tarigan Rufinus, A. (2011). Kecenderungan Pemberitaan Kasus Korupsi Pada Surat Kabar. Dewan Pers, 5, Mei.

Ward, M. (2013). Jurnalism Online. Taylor and Francis.

Wibawa, D. (2018). Communication pattern of Indonesian journalists with news source in the internet era. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3401-19

.........(2020). Hoax and Local Jurnalist in Bandung. Prosiding of the Inernational Seminar on Research for Social Justice (ISRIS 2018), 30 October 2018 Bandung, Netherland: CRC Press/Balkema

Wijaya, C. (2010). Pendidikan Remidial: Sarana Pengembangan Mutu Sumber daya Manusia. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Winarto. (2017). Etika Jurnalisik di Era Digital. Dewan Pers, 15.

Yunus, S. (2012). Jurnalistik Terapan. Ghalia Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v13i2.1922

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Published by:
Communication Science Departement
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Email: profetik.jurnalkomunikasi@gmail.com