GEN Z AND RELIGIOUS-BASED SOCIAL DISTANCE

Hapsari Dwiningtyas Sulistyani, Turnomo Rahardjo, Lintang Ratri Rahmiaji

Abstract


Gen Z is the generation that were born between 1996 and 2015. In this paper the gen z is represented by university students who become the respondents of this research. The main focus of this paper is describing the religion-based social distance among the university students. Social distance is the degree of separation between different social groups. The specific group this paper focuses on is the religion-based groups. The main theory employs in this research is Social Scale theory that provide the basic instrument of social distance measurement. To gather the data this research uses survey and interviews. The result depicts that there are social distances on particular religious groups. The percentages of respondents who feel a distance to certain religious groups are varied. The percentages of respondent who perceived a distance toward Islam is only 7,5 percent. Whereas the percentage that of social distance to local religions, on the other hand, is staggering on the value 84,3 percent. The result signifies that most of respondent feel that they have a social distance to local religious groups. The respondent argues that the main reason for the social distance toward the local religious group is the perception that the local religious believers are more likely to form a cult that might be endangered the social harmony in the university.

Keywords


Social Distance, Religious Groups, Gen Z, Social Distance Scale

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chuah, S. H., Gachter, S., Hoffmann, R., & Tan, J. H. W. (2016). Religion, Discrimination and Trust Across Three Cultures. European Economic Review, 90, 280–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.008

Forest-Bank, S. S., & Dupper, D. R. (2016). A Qualitative Study of Coping with Religious Minority Status in Public Schools. Children and Youth Sevices Review, 61, 261–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.025

Griffin, E. (2012). Communication, A First Look At Communication Theory. McGraw Hill.

Jaffe, M. E., Rudert, S. C., & Greifener, R. (2019). You should go for diversity, but I’d rather stay with similar others: Social distance modulates the preference for diversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103881

Jandt, F. E. (2004). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication, Identities in a Global Community. SAGE Publication.

Javakhishvili, N., Kochlashvili, N., Schneider, J. F., & Makashvili, A. (2016). Measuring Ethnic Attitudes: Tolerance and Social Distance from Cross-cultural Perspective. In Gregory T. Papanikos (Ed.), An Anthology of Social Themes (pp. 193–204). ATINER.

Karakayali, N. (2009). S. F. S. D. and A. O. V. 24 (3): 538-563. (2009). Social Distance and Affective Orientation. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 538–563.

Komnasham. (2016). Upaya Negara Menjamin Hak-Hak Kelompok Minoritas Di Indonesia Sebuah Laporan Awal.

Markali, G. E. (2007). Hubungan Antara Identifikasi Etnis dengan Jarak Sosial Terhadap Etnis Jawa pada Etnis Tionghoa [Universitas Widya Mandala Surabaya]. http://repository.wima.ac.id/3252/

Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. (2010). Intercultural Communication in Context (fifth). McGraw Hill.

Muhid, A., & Fadeli, M. I. (2018). Korelasi Antara Prasangka Sosial dan Toleransi Beragama Pada Mahasiswa Aktivis Organisasi Kemahasiswaan di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 15(02), 124–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/al%20qodiri.v15i2.3191

Muthahhari, T. (2017). Survei UIN Jakarta: Intoleransi Tumbuh di Banyak Sekolah dan Kampus. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/survei-uin-jakarta-intoleransi-tumbuh-di-banyak-sekolah-dan-kampus-czQL

Neuliep, J. W. (2006). Intercultural Communication, A Contextual Approach (Third). SAGE Publication.

Rahardjo, T., & Lukmantoro, T. (2015). Membangun Model Komunikasi Masyarakat Multi Agama.

Rogers, E. M., & Steinfatt, T. M. (1999). Intercultural Communication. Waveland Press.

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Communication Between Cultures (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., & Roy, C. S. (2017). Communication Between Culture (9th ed.). Cengange Learning.

Susetyo, D. P. B. (2002). Stereotip dan Relasi Antar Etnis Cina dan Etnis Jawa Pada Mahasiswa di Semarang. Universitas Indonesia.

Wardah, F. (2018). LIPI: Intoleransi Politik di Indonesia Meningkat. Voaindonesia.Com. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/lipi-intoleransi-politik-di-indonesia-meningkat/4687374.html




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v14i1.1970

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Published by:
Communication Science Departement
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Email: profetik.uinsuka@gmail.com