BOOTSTRAPPING ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING RELIGIOUS MODERATION IN MEDAN CITY

Authors

  • Hasan Sazali Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Abdul Rahman Matondang Univesitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v16i2.2601

Keywords:

Religious Moderation, Tolerance, Religiosity, Bootstraping Analysis, Medan City

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of religiosity, religious tolerance, and communication that directly and indirectly affects Religious Moderation in Medan City. This study uses a quantitative method with bootstrapping analysis using the Smart PLS3.01 application. Respondents in this study were Muslims in Medan City aged 17-45 years who were drawn based on the Slovin formula with a significance degree of 0.10. The sample of this study amounted to 100 people determined by proportional random sampling, which was drawn evenly based on the population of Medan City per sub-district. The results of this study show that religiosity and religious tolerance directly affect religious moderation in Medan City. The communication variable as an intervening variable failed to indirectly influence religiosity and religious tolerance on religious moderation in Medan City. The recommendations are: Religious moderation needs to be a solution amid the problems of intolerance and disintegration in Medan by promoting effective communication. Values in religious moderation are still too general and abstract to be applied in various regions with different cultural conditions and styles. For that, we need a local formulation to implement how religious moderation works, Further research is needed on aspects of local culture to strengthen moderation in Medan City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abror, M. (2020). Moderasi Beragama Dalam Bingkai Toleransi. RUSYDIAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 1(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.35961/rsd.v1i2.174

Adhim, F. (2009). Pengaruh Religiusitas Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Alumni dan Bukan Alumni Pesantren (Studi pada Kantor Depag Kabupaten Bangkalan). Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 5(2), 127–154.

Akhmadi, A. (2019). Moderasi Beragama Dalam Keragaman Indonesia Religious Moderation in Indonesia ’ S Diversity. Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 13(2), 45–55.

Alabdulhadi, M. M. J. (2019). Religious tolerance in secondary Islamic Education textbooks in Kuwait. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(4), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2019.1585329

Alkazemi, M. (2019). Inner Peace or Piece of Mind? Religiosity, Media Exposure and Tolerance for Disagreement about Religion. Journal of Media and Religion, 18(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2019.1651574

Amalia, I., Suzanna, E., & Adyani, L. (2021). Peran Religiusitas Bagi Masyarakat Aceh dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid- 19. Jurnal Diversita, 7(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i1.4535

Apriani, N. W., & Aryani, N. K. (2022). Moderasi Beragama. In Kalangwan Jurnal Pendidikan Agama, Bahasa dan Sastra (Vol. 12, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.25078/kalangwan.v12i1.737

Arif, S. (2020). Moderasi Beragama dalam Diskursus Negara Islam: Pemikiran KH Abdurrahman Wahid. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 13(1), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v13i1.189

Arya Pering, I. M. A. (2020). Kajian Analisis Jalur Dengan Structural Equation Modeling (Sem) Smart-Pls 3.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Satyagraha, 3(2), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.47532/jis.v3i2.177

Asep S Muhtadi. (2019). Komunikasi Lintas Agama: Mencari Solusi Konflik Agama. Conference Proceeding ICONIMAD 2019, 275, 1.

Budhiasa, S. (2016). Analisis Statistik Multivariate Dengan Aplikasi SEM PLS SMARTPLS 3.2.6. In Udayana University Press. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1153440

Bukhari, S. M. B. R., Javed, T., & Nasir, A. (2021). Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(II), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(vi-ii).23

Carreras, M., & Verghese, A. (2020). Violence, Insecurity, and Religiosity: A Multilevel Analysis of 71 Countries. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(6), 1310–1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1466704

DeVito, J. A. (2016). The Interpersonal Communication Book. British Library.

Dhona, H. R. ka, Rianto, P., Hermawan, A.,  S. A., Prastya, R. N. M., DKN, I. N., Hariyanti, P., Setiadi, A. A. F., & Tanjung, S. (2022). Islam Dalam Studi Komunikasi. UII Press Yogyakarta.

Edeh, E., Lo, W.-J., & Khojasteh, J. (2022). Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2108813

Fajron, A., & Hum, D. H. N. T. M. (2020). Moderasi Beragama (Perspektif Quraish Shihab dan Syeikh Nawawi Al-Batani: Kajian Analisis Ayat Tentang Wasatiyyah Di Wilayah Banten) (p. 118 hlm). http://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/5990/1/Scan Buku Dr. Naf%27an Moderasi Beragama.pdf

Gultom, R. (2021). Kesetaraan Gender pada Penyuluh Agama Islam dalam Melakukan Penguatan Komunikasi Pembangunan Agama di Kabupaten Simalungun Sumatera Utara. Communication & Social Media, 1–12. http://jurnal.medanresourcecenter.org/index.php/CSM/article/view/87%0Ahttp://jurnal.medanresourcecenter.org/index.php/CSM/article/download/87/65

Hamdi, S., Munawarah, M., & Hamidah, H. (2021). Revitalisasi Syiar Moderasi Beragama di Media Sosial: Gaungkan Konten Moderasi untuk Membangun Harmonisasi. Intizar, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v27i1.8191

Hasan, M. (2021). Prinsip Moderasi Beragama Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa. Jurnal Mubtadiin, 7(2), 111–123. https://journal.an-nur.ac.id/index.php/mubtadii

Heriyanto, H. (2018). Memahami Bagaimana Mahasiswa Melakukan Penelusuran Informasi melalui Academic Databases. Anuva, 2(4), 369. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.2.4.369-376

Herlina, Acim, Misnah, & Khairunnisa, R. (2019). Need Analysis of Use Google Form for Learning in Pgsd Fkip Tadulako University. Jurnal Dikdas, 7(2), 143–150.

Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710

Iqbal, M., Simarmata, J., Feriyansyah, F., Tambunan, A. R. S., Sihite, O., Gandamana, A., Eza, G. N., Kurniawan, F., Asiah, A., Rozi, F., Faisal, F., Manurung, I. F. U., Ihwani, M., Nathan, P. L. A., Sitanggang, N., Simbolon, N., Simanjuntak, E. B., & Limbong, T. (2018). Using Google form for student worksheet as learning media. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3.4 Special Issue 4), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13646

Jumala, N. (2019). Moderasi Berpikir untuk Menempati Tingkatan Spiritual Tertinggi dalam Beragama. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 21(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v21i2.5526

Kirdiş, E. (2019). Similar Contexts, Different Behaviour: Explaining the Non-Linear Moderation and Immoderation of Islamic Political Parties in Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 20(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2019.1698421

Kosasih, E. (2019). Literasi Media Sosial dalam Pemasyarakatan Sikap Moderasi Beragama. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 12(2), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v12i2.118

Kudus, I. (2020). At Tabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam. 7(1).

Larkin, C., & Nasasra, M. (2021). The “inclusion-moderation” illusion: re-framing the Islamic movement inside Israel. Democratization, 28(4), 742–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1865315

Ma’arif, A. A. (2022). Membangun Komunikasi antara Agama dan Pembangunan. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 2(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i1.16877

Maurer, C., & Gellera, G. (2020). Contexts of religious tolerance: New perspectives from early modern Britain and beyond. Global Intellectual History, 5(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2019.1699869

Medan, P. K. (2021). perwal-nomor-28-tahun-2021.

Mega, I. (2021). Menentukan ukuran sampel penelitian di bidang matematika pada skala data metrik. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Pembelajaran, 16(1), 98–102.

Memon, M. A., T., R., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2021). Pls-Sem Statistical Programs: a Review. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), i–xiv. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.5(1)06

Ne’eman-Haviv, V., Yael, W. A., & Chaim, L. (2020). Is religiosity a risk or a protective factor? The connection between religiosity and deviance among religious youths. Israel Affairs, 26(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1754582

Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian Marketing: Perbandingan Hasil antara Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, dan SPSS untuk Jumlah Sampel Besar. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR), 2(4), 216–227. https://www.jiemar.org/index.php/jiemar/article/view/178/138

Rachman, F. P. A. putra, Goejantoro, R., & Hayati, M. N. (2018). Penentuan Jumlah Replikasi Bootstrap Menggunakan Metode Pretest Pada Independent Sampel T Test ( Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kabupaten / Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur dan Kalimantan Utara Tahun 2015 ). Jurnal Eksponensial, 9(1), 35–40.

Rahmah, L. A., & Amaludin, A. (2021). Penerapan Interaksi Sosial Antar Masyarakat Melalui Moderasi Beragama Dan Sikap Toleransi di Desa Gentasari Kecamatan Kroya Kabupaten Cilacap. To Maega : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.35914/tomaega.v4i3.860

Santosa, A. (2019). Warga Protes Ibadah GBI di Rumah Tinggal di Medan, Polisi Mediasi. Detik News. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4383373/warga-protes-ibadah-gbi-di-rumah-tinggal-di-medan-polisi-mediasi

Saptomo, W. L. Y., & Rimawati, E. (2020). Path Analisis Technology Acceptance Model pada Penerapan Blended Learning. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 6(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v6i2.235

Schwörer, J., & Romero-Vidal, X. (2020). Radical right populism and religion: mapping parties’ religious communication in Western Europe. Religion, State and Society, 48(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2019.1704611

SETARA Institute. (2018). Ringkasan Eksekutif Indeks Kota Toleran Tahun 2018. 5–6. http://setara-institute.org/indeks-kota-toleran-tahun-2018/

SETARA Institute. (2020). Indeks-Kota-Toleran. Https://Setara-Institute.Org, 47.

Sholahuddin, & Eko Putro, Z. A. (2020). Penyuluh Agama Islam, Religiusitas, dan Salatiga sebagai Kota Toleran. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 8(2), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v8i2.163

Sorong, A. D. I., Barat, P., & Kudus, I. (2022). Impression Management Komunikasi Lintas Ali Nurdin Ali Abdul Wakhid Abstract : Abstrak : A . Pendahuluan Indonesia memiliki keragaman dalam etnik , suku , ras , dan agama . Masyarakat Indonesia adalah masyarakat majmuk dan plural 1 . 17(1), 69–102.

Speed, D., & Fowler, K. (2021). One size doesn’t fit all: religious/spiritual identities moderate salutary effects of religion. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1863934

Subchi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Latifa, R., & Sa’diyah, S. (2022). Religious Moderation in Indonesian Muslims. Religions, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050451

Susi. (2021). Komunikasi Dalam Moderasi Beragama “ Perspektif Filsafat Komunikasi .” Prosiding Webinar Nasional IAHN-TP Palangka Raya, 4, 64.

Syros, V. (2019). Religious toleration and the limits of liberal secularism: The case of India. Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory, 15(3–4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448727.2019.1565311

Tiro, M. A., Makassar, U. N., Sukarna, S., & Makassar, U. N. (2020). Analisis Jalur. January.

van Es, M. A., Laan, N. ter, & Meinema, E. (2021). Beyond ‘radical’ versus ‘moderate’? New perspectives on the politics of moderation in Muslim majority and Muslim minority settings. Religion, 51(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1865616

Walt. (2014). Measuring Religious Tolerance in Education; Towards an instrument for measuring religious tolerance among educators and their students worldwide. Faculty of Education Sciences Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Republic of South Africa.

Wijaya Mulya, T., & Aditomo, A. (2019). Researching religious tolerance education using discourse analysis: a case study from Indonesia. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1556602

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).


5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.

7. Miscellaneous

Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.