Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif

MARJINALISASI PEDESAAN AKIBAT RELASI KUASA LOKAL DAN SUPRALOKAL

2016-09-08

Authors

  • Yunindya Wati
    Universitas Sriwijaya

Downloads

Article Galley

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2014)
Page: 83-95
806 views
1406 PDF Downloads

License

Authors who publish with JSR agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

MARJINALISASI PEDESAAN AKIBAT RELASI KUASA LOKAL DAN SUPRALOKAL. (2016). Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 9(1), 83-95. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/isoshum/sosiologireflektif/article/view/1137

Abstract

This paper analyses the development of village as a sosial transformation in which it is always seen as a dynamic community and still exist on the continuum changes from time to time. To understand a sosial process in rural areas, especially related to the State as an super-local institution,it is necessary to consider the Law No. 5 of 1979 on the village governance. This is important because through that law,we can understand how the Stateintervene and shapes a lokal authority. This can be clearly seen through the uniformity of the village governance as an effort to gain a control mechanism over the local people. As a consequence, the State, in the name of development, create its agent within a rural governance.