Deconstruction of Landreform Policy in Indonesia (Study of Regulation of President Number 86 Of 2018 about Agrarian Reforms)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v10i2.2342Keywords:
Deconstruction, Land Reform, Agrarian ReformAbstract
There is a large gap between the regulation of Land Reform in the UUPA, with Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2014 concerning Agrarian Reform. On one hand, the UUPA states that Land Reform is a systematic effort by the state to rearrange ownership, control, and access to land. Whereas on the other hand, the Presidential Regulation stipulates that Land Reform is equated with Agrarian Reform, and the scope of the arrangement covers the arrangement of access and arrangement of assets. Nevertheless, this Perpres then only means Landreform merely as the legalization of assets, which is part of the structuring of assets. One thing that is very different from the UUPA version of Landreform. This study aims to uncover the causes of the gap, and formulate an ideal form of regulation. This study uses the normative juridical method, with the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this study are first, the difference in regulation is caused by the two legal products born from different features or characteristics. The Perpres on Agrarian Reform was born in a regime that tends to be instrumentalist liberalism, while the UUPA was born from a legal regime that tends to be socialistic-communal. Second, there are at least 2 things that need to be fixed in the Landreform settings. First, the affirmation of the state's position in implementing Landreform, whether to continue to use the instrumentalist, socialistic-communal liberalistic model, or the conception of a welfare state that is native to Indonesia. Second, TORA must be the object of Land Procurement for Public Interest. Thus, Landreform activities can become the main national agenda and must be carried out.
References
Agustiati. “Sistem Ekonomi Kapitalisme.” Journal Academica, 2009, 152–66.
Arrsa, Ria Casmi. Deideologi Pancasila: analisis kritis perspektif sejarah hukum ketatanegaraan Indonesia. UB Press, 2011.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi ekonomi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2010.
Atmoko, Suwardi and Arief Dwi. “Pembaharuan Hukum Agraria Di Indonesia.” Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Volume 3, no. 2 (2019): hlm. 235.
Attamimi, A. Hamid S.; Peranan keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan negara : suatu studi analisis mengenai keputusan Presiden yang berfungsi pengaturan dalam kurun waktu Pelita I-Pelita IV. Kantor Menteri Negara Perumahan Rakyat, 1990.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/, 2016.
Board, Indonesia Investment Coordinating. “Domestic and Foreign Direct Investment.” Economic Growth and Development. Jakarta, 2019.
Budi Harsono. Hukum agraria Indonesia : sejarah pembentukan undang-undang pokok agraria, isi dan pelaksanaannya. Jilid 1, Hukum tanah nasional. Djambatan, 1997.
Das, Raju. “David Harvey’S Theory of Accumulation By Dispossession.” World Review of Political Economy 8, no. 4 (2017): 590–616.
Didik Indradewa. “Faktor-Faktor Produksi Utama.” In Pembangunan Pertanian: Membangun Kedaulatan Pangan, diedit oleh Triwibowo Yuwono, 2016.
Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. Program redistribusi tanah di Indonesia : suatu sarana ke arah pemecahan masalah penguasaan tanah danp pemilikan tanah. Rajawali, 1985.
Isnaeni, Diyan. “Kebijakan Landreform Sebagai Penerapan Politik Pembaharuan Hukum Agraria Yang Berparadigma Pancasila.” JU-ke (Jurnal Ketahanan Pangan) 1, no. 2 (Desember 2017): 83–97.
Jihad, R. Saddam Al- (Respiratori). Pancasila ideologi dunia : sintesis kapitalisme, sosialisme, dan Islam, 2018.
Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria. “Empat Tahun Implementasi Reforma Agraria,” 2019.
Ladejinsky, Wolf Isaac., dan Louis Joseph Walinsky. Agrarian reform as unfinished business : the selected papers of Wolf Ladejinsky. New York: Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press, 1977.
Luthfi, Ahmad Nashih, dan R M Fauzi. Kronik Agraria Indonesia (Memperluas Imajinasi Lintas Zaman, Sektor dan Aktor). Yogyakarta (ID): STPN Press bekerjasam dengan Sayogyo Institute dan Institute Sejarah Sosisal Indonesia, 2010.
Md, Mahfud. Politik hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2009.
Nurhayati. “Pelaksanaan Redistribusi Tanah Obyek Landreform di Kecamatan Semarang Barat Kota Semarang.” Universitas Diponegoro, 2006.
Nurlani, Meirina. “Pengaruh Pembaharuan Hukum Agraria Nasional Terhadap Politik Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Thengkyang 2, no. 1 Desember (Desember 2019): 106–24.
Peter Rosset, Raj Patel, And Michel Courville. Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform. Development in Practice. Vol. 17. New York: Food First Book, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701723377.
Rajagukguk, Erman. Hukum Agraria, Pola Penguasaan Tanah, dan Kebutuhan Hidup. Penerbit Chandra Pratama, 1995.
Ramadhani, Rahmat. “Peran Poltik Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Agraria Nasional.” SOSEK : Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi 1, no. 1 (Juli 2020): 1–6.
Sen, Amartya. Poverty and Famines. Poverty and Famines. Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198284632.001.0001.
Soetomo. Kesejahteraan dan upaya mewujudkannya dalam perspektif masyarakat lokal. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.
Statistik, Badan Pusat. “Badan Pusat Statistik.” Sensus Pertanian 2013, 2013.
Supriadi. Hukum agraria. Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Susanto, Anthon F. (Anthon Freddy). Dekonstruksi hukum : eksplorasi teks dan model pembacaan. Genta Pub, 2010.
Ziegler, Jean. “UN. Commission on Human Rights. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food.” UN, Januari 2003.
