Problematika Hakim dalam Menghadapi Antinomi

Authors

  • Ach. Tahir State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v1i1.1900

Abstract

In deciding some cases, judges might get various antinomies. Antinomy is a contradiction between legal interests based on justice of each disputed party. The made decision must proportionally contain three principles: certainty, usefulness, and justice. If they obtain the contradiction between the principle of justice and legal certainty, they should prioritize the former. If they get the contradiction between an old statute and a new statute not abrogating the old one, they must enact the new one (lex posteriori derogat legi priori). If they find the contradiction between a superior statute and an inferior statute, they must use the superior one (lex superior derogat legi inferiori). If they get the contradiction between a statute and an court decision (Jurisprudence), they must use the latter (res judicata pro veritate habetur). If they get the contradiction between a statute and a custom law, they must prioritize the latter.

Author Biography

  • Ach. Tahir, State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga
    Law

References

Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologia: Principles of Morality, London England: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1996.

_____, Summa Theologi, Vol.37: Justice, London England: Eyre and Spottiswoode Limited, 1975.

Ali, Achmad, Peranan Pengadilan sebagai Pranata Sosial, Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum, Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin, 1999.

Andreae, Fockema, Kamus Istilah Hukum, Belanda-Indonesia, Jakarta: Binacipta IKAPI, 1983.

Black’ Law Dictionary-, 1990, Six edition.

Cooksey, Ray W, Decision Making, Department of Marketing and Management, University of New England Armidale, NSW 2351, 1996.

Darmadiharjo, Darji dan Sidharta, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, cetakan 2, Edisi revisi Maret, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1996.

Friedman, W, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum, Telaah Kritis atas Teori, Teori Hukum, (susunan I), Jakarta: Rajawalipers, 1990.

Goodwin, Robert, Aquinas’s Justice; An Interpretation, The New Scholasticism, Bowling Green State University, University of Ohio, 1989.

Hamzah, Andi, 1986. Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986.

Harahap, Yahya, Peran Yurisprudensi Sebagai Standar Hukum Sangat Penting Pada Era Globalisasi, Varia Peradilan Tahun VIII, Mei 1993, No. 92, 1992.

Inery, Ralph, St. Thomas Aquinas: Ethics, First Edition, Nortre Dame, 1977. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Edisi Kedua,

Cetakan Pertama, Januari, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.

_____, Mengenal Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Edisi Kelima, Cetakan Kedua, Mei, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2005.

Prennushi, Giovanna, Egrity and Development, Washington DC: Development Outreach, World Bank Institute, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-01

How to Cite

Problematika Hakim dalam Menghadapi Antinomi. (2012). Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v1i1.1900