Agresi dan Kejahatan Terhadap Perdamaian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v3i1.1946Abstract
The defining of aggression and the penal responsibility should be able to bearranged, both based on the London Agreement and the Draft Code of Crime of
Against and Security of Mankind. But because the super power states have egoism so
that they still will act aggression in the name of self defense right. The issues of
terrorism, communism ideology and radicalism always will be reasoning of self defense to
offense and attack another states and then to upset peace rights. Economic interesting to
developing countries natural resources is a main motivation of self defense.
References
Agung Yudhawiranata, “Tentang “Pengadilan HAM”
Internasional” paper pada Training Hukum HAM untuk
Dosen Pengajar Hukum HAM di Fakultas Hukum Negeri
dan Swasta di Indonesia, diselenggarakan oleh PUSHAM
UII dan Norwegian Center for Human Rights (NCHR)
Di Yogyakarta, 23-27 Januari 2006
Antonio Cassese, International Criminal Law, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2003
Benjamin B. Ferencz, “Enabling the International Criminal Court to
Punish Aggression” dalam Washington University Global Studies Law
Review ,Vol. 6:551
Charter of the International Military Tribunal,
http://www.icls.de/dokumente/imt_statute.pdf
Draft Code of Crime of Against and Security of Mankind 1996, UN
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Pengadilan atas Beberapa Kejahatan Serius
terhadap HAM , Erlangga, Jakarta, 2010
