Pengujian Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka dalam Kerangka Praperadilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v4i2.1992Abstract
A pretrial construction as it has been regulated in the IndonesianCriminalProcedure Code had instantly changed after the Constitutional Court decision
Number : 21/PUU-XII/2014 that being announced on April 28, 2015. The
pretrial construction was initially authorized only to examine and decide the validity of
arrest and detention, the validity of investigation and prosecution termination, and the
demand for compensation or rehabilitation. The authority of the pretrial by a quo
decision was then expanded by adding an examination on the validity of inquiry, the
validity of confiscation, and the validity of suspect determination. Although a quo
decision is reputed tohave exceeded the authority of the Constitutional Court because it
is judged of creating a new norm, a quo decision remains final and tied so that it should
be considered as a complement to the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.
References
Fuady, Munir, Teori Hukum Pembuktian, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti,
Hamzah, Andi, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Beberapa Negara, Jakarta,
Sinar Grafika, 2002.
Hamzah dan RM Surachman, Andi, Pre Trial Justice & Discretionary
Justice Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika,
Hiariej, Eddy O. S., Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta, Erlangga,
Loqman, Loebby,Pra-Peradilan di Indonesia, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia,
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta,
Liberty, 2002.