Tauzī‘ wa Tanwī‘ Bunūd As'islah Ikhtibār An-Nahw li-shaff Ats-Tsālis Al-mutawašithah
Distribution and Diversification of Arabic Grammar Test Items for The Third Grade of Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2023.091-07Keywords:
Arabic Grammar, Difersification, Evaluation, Items Test, Nahwu, SyntaxAbstract
In preparing the test items, the test maker must take care of using suitable type of test items and diversifying it. Each test item has criteria, advantages, and disadvantages that need to be considered. This research aims to reveal the distribution and diversification of Arabic grammar test items for the third grade in the Junior High School in Batu City. The research is qualitative and descriptive, as it describes the research sample according to a theory and reveals the hidden phenomena. The primary research sample is the Arabic grammar test items for the third grade of Junior High School in the 2019-2020 school year that include the contents taken from the textbook "An-nahwu Al-wadih". The research concluded that the teacher diversified the test with some types of tests. The test is divided into four types of test that include objective and subjective tests such as multiple choice, short answer, completion or filling the blank, and essay. The comprehensive preparation prepared by the evaluation administrations, such as the test item outline, will help the question maker develop the skills of preparing test items.
Keywords: Arabic Grammar, Diversification, Evaluation, Items Test, Nahwu, Syntax.
ملخص
عند إعداد بنود الاختبار ، يجب على معد الاختبار أن يعتني باستخدام النوع المناسب من بنود الاختبار وتنويعه. لكل بوع الاختبار معايير ومزايا وعيوب يجب مراعاتها. يهدف هذا البحث إلى الكشف عن توزيع وتنويع بنود اختبار النحو للصف الثالث بالمدرسة المتوسطة بمدينة باتو. يعتبر البحث بحثا نوعيًا ووصفيًا حيث أنه يصف عينة البحث وفق نظرية ويكشف الظواهر الخفية. عينة البحث الأولية هي بنود اختبار النحو للصف الثالث المتوسط للعام الدراسي 2019-2020 ومحتوياتها مأخوذة من الكتاب المقرر "النحو الواضح". وخلصت الدراسة أنه قد قام المدرس بتنويع الاختبارات التي تنقسم إلى أربعة أنواع من الاختبارات التي تشمل الاختبار الموضوعي وغير الموضوعي مثل الاختيار من متعدد والإجابة القصيرة والتكملة والمقال. والإعداد الشامل من إداريات التقويم، مثل مخطط بنود الاختبار لأنه يساعد معدّ الاختبار على تطوير مهارات إعداد بنود الاختبار.
الكلمات الرئيسية: نحو ، تنويع ، تقويم ، بنود الاختبار
Downloads
References
Alwan, Yahya. “At-Taqwim Wa Al-Qiyas At-Tarbawiy Wa Dauruhu Fi Injah Al-Amaliayah At-Ta’limiyah.” Majallah Al-Ulum Al Insaniyah Jamiah Muhammad Khaidir, no. 11 (2007): 9–31.
Applegate, Gregory M, Karen A Sutherland, Kirk A Becker, and Xiao Luo. “The Effect of Option Homogeneity in Multiple- Choice Items.” Applied Psychological Measurement 43, no. 2 (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618770803.
Atalmis, Erkan Hasan, and Neal Martin Kingston. “The Impact of Homogeneity of Answer Choices on Item Difficulty and Discrimination.” SAGE Open 8, no. 1 (2018): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018758147.
Dalman, Rizki Pratama, and Junaidi Junaidi. “Penyebab Sulitnya Siswa Menjawab Soal HOTS Dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi Di Kelas XI IPS SMAN 1 Batang Kapas Pesisir Selatan.” Naradidik: Journal of Education and Pedagogy 1, no. 1 (2022): 103–12. https://doi.org/10.24036/nara.v1i1.12.
Desheng, Chen, and Ashitha Varghese. “Testing and Evaluation of Language Skills.” IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME) 1, no. 2 (2013): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0123133.
Dinçer, Betül Hazal, Elena Antonova-Unlu, and Alper Kumcu. “Assessing The Use of Multiple-Choice Translation Items in English Proficiency Tests The Case of The National English Proficiency Test in Turkey.” Applied Linguistics Review 13, no. 4 (2019): 461–75. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/applirev-2019-0064.
Djiwandono, Soenardi. Tes Bahasa: Pegangan Bagi Pengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: Indeks, 2011.
Gürgil, Fitnat. “Table, Graphic, and Diagram Interpretation and Preparation Skills Social Studies and Geography Teachers’ Practice and Beliefs.” Review of International Geographical Education Online 8, no. 3 (2018): 517–41. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.505266.
Hadad, Yossi, Baruch Keren, and Gali Naveh. “The Relative Importance of Teaching Evaluation Criteria from The Points of View of Students and Faculty.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45, no. 3 (2020): 447–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1665623.
Hakim, Adnan. “Contribution of Competence Teacher (Pedagogical, Personality, Professional Competence and Social) On the Performance of Learning.” The International Journal Of Engineering And Science 4, no. 2 (2015): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1330039.V1.
Harsono, Ainur Rofiq Hafsi, and Hendry Budiman. “Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru SDI Al Munawwarah Pamekasan Melalui Pelatihan Penyusunan Soal.” JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) 4, no. 2 (2020): 281–90. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v4i2.2049.
Ibrahim, Muhammad Bagdad. “Asa>lib Taqwi>m At-Tahs}i>l Fi> Ma>ddah Ar-Riyad}iyya>t Dira>satun Maida>niyyatun Ala> Mustawa> Aqsa>m As-Sa>disah Ibtida>’i.” Insaniyat, no. 49 (2010): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.4000/insaniyat.4393.
Ismail, Dahdi, and Al-winas Mizyani. “At-Taqwi>m At-Tarbawiyy Mafhu>muhu Wa Ahammiyatuhu , No. 31 (2017): 115–126.” Majallah Al-’ulum Al-Insaniyyah Wa Al-Ijtima’iyyah 31 (2017): 115–26.
Jumainah, Muliyadi, and Norliani. “Test Item Construction and Its Appropriateness towards Indicators.” LENTERA Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan 12, no. 2 (2017): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.33654/jpl.v12i2.354.
Karimah, R K N, T A Kusmayadi, and I Pramudya. “Analysis of Difficulties in Mathematics Learning on Students with Guardian Personality Type in Problem-Solving HOTS Geometry Test.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108:0–10. IOP Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012074.
Keller-Schneider, Manuela, Hua Flora Zhong, and Alexander Seeshing Yeung. “Competence and Challenge in Professional Development Teacher Perceptions at Different Stages of Career.” Journal of Education for Teaching 46, no. 1 (2020): 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1708626.
Kusuma, Arie Purwa, and Syita Faith ’Adna. “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Analysis of Student Difficulties in Completing Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Problem of Two Variables Linear Equation System.” Jurnal Sains Dan Matematika Unpam 3, no. 2 (2021): 150–60. https://doi.org/10.32493/jsmu.v3i2.8674.
Laili, Muhibbatul. “Ketepatan Kontruksi Butir Pilihan Ganda Bahasa Arab.” ALSUNIYAT: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Arab 3, no. 2 (2020): 111–24. https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v3i2.25272.
Lindner, Marlit A., Jan M. Ihme, Steffani Saß, and Olaf Köller. “How Representational Pictures Enhance Students’ Performance and Test-Taking Pleasure in Low-Stakes Assessment.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 34, no. 6 (2018): 376–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000351.
Mahmud, Hamdi Syakir. At-Taqwi>m At-Tarbawiyy Li Al-Mu’allimi>n Wa Al-Mu’allima>t. Hail: Dar Al-andalus Li An-nasyr wa At-tauzi’, 2004.
Maulana, Deni, and Anwar Sanusi. “Analisis Butir Soal Bahasa Arab Ujian Akhir Madrasah Bersama Daerah (UِAMBD) Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Tahun 2017-2018.” Ta’lim Al-’Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban 4, no. 1 (2020): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpba.v4i1.8054.
Muh}ammad, Abdu Al-kha>liq. Ikhtiba>ra>tu Al-Lugah Al-‘Arabiyah. Ar-riya>d: Maktabah Al-malik Fahd Al-wat}aniyyah, 1996.
Musa, Muhammad Fuad. Al-Mana>hiju Ususuha> ’Ana>shiruha> Tanz}i>ma>tuha>. Al-Mansurah: Jami’ah Al-mansurah, 2001.
Nasikhah, Malikhatun, and Zulfa Amalia Wahidah. “Analysis of Daily Test Items In Arabic For Muhammadiyah Elementary School Sidoarum Yogyakarta.” Asalibuna 4, no. 2 (2020): 58–75.
Nuraini, Tri, and Julianto. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas Iv Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Hots (High Order Thinking Skills) Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA.” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 10, no. 1 (2022): 60–74.
Prihartini, Yogia, Wahyudi Buska, and Nur Hasnah. “Analysis of Test Item on the Final Test Semester Exam on Arabic Subjects.” Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 6, no. 1 (2019): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v6i1.10926.
Qodri, Muhammad. “Arabic Language Test in the Perspective of Competency-Based Curriculum for Students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Malang.” Izdihar: Journal of Arabic Language Adn Literature 2, no. 2 (2019): 115–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v2i2.10003.
Rahma, Nourelhouda A.A., Mahdi M.A. Shamad, Muawia E.A. Idris, Omer Abdelgadir Elfaki, Walyedldin E.M. Elfakey, and Karimeldin Mohamed Ali Salih. “Comparison in The Quality of Distractors in Three and Four Options Type of Multiple Choice Questions.” Advances in Medical Education and Practice 8 (2017): 287–91. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S128318.
Raymond, Mark R., Craig Stevens, and S. Deniz Bucak. “The Optimal Number of Options for Multiple-Choice Questions on High-Stakes Tests: Application of a Revised Index for Detecting Nonfunctional Distractors.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 24, no. 1 (2019): 141–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9855-9.
Román, Marta Leyton, Susana Lobato Muñoz, and Ruth Jiménez Castuera. “The Importance of Assigning Responsibility during Evaluation in Order to Increase Student Satisfaction from Physical Education Classes A Structural Equation Model.” PLoS ONE 14, no. 9 (2019): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209398.
Sa’adah, Joudat Ahmad, and Abdullah Muhammad Ibrahim. Al-Manhaj Al-’adrasiyy Al-’u‘A>s}ir. VI. Amman: Dar Al-fikr, 2014.
Šafránková, Anna Petr, and Klára Zátopková. “Teachers’ Evaluation of Importance of Selected Determinants of Education of Socially Disadvantaged Pupils.” Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science 10, no. 1 (2017): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2017.100104.
Sirota, Miroslav, and Marie Juanchich. “Effect of Response Format on Cognitive Reflection Validating a Two- and Four-Option Multiple Choice Question Version of The Cognitive Reflection Test.” Behavior Research Methods 50, no. 6 (2018): 2511–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1029-4.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methodes). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
Sumaryanta, Djemari Mardapi, Sugiman, and Tutut Herawan. “Assessing Teacher Competence and Its Follow-up to Support Professional Development Sustainability.” Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 20, no. 1 (2018): 106–23. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0007.
Wang, Chengbo. “Teaching Quality Criteria’s Importance Levels in Higher Education: A Comparison between British and Chinese Students’ Evaluation.” International Journal of Learning and Teaching 3, no. 4 (2017): 276–80. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.3.4.276-280.
Wang, Lin. “Does Rearranging Multiple-Choice Item Response Options Affect Item and Test Performance?” ETS Research Report Series 2019, no. 1 (2019): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12238.
Widoyoko, S. Eko Putro. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis Pendidikan Dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
———. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis Pendidikan Dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Willoughby, Jessica Fitts, and Shuang Liu. “Do Pictures Help Tell The Story An Experimental Test of Narrative and Emojis in A Nealth Text Message Intervention.” Computers in Human Behavior 79 (2018): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.031.
Yunus, Syarifuddin. “Mengkritisi Kompetensi Guru.” news.detik.com, 2017. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-3741162/mengkritisi-kompetensi-guru).
Zulfa, H., D. R.S. Saputro, and Riyadi. “Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Learning with Artisan Character Type in HOTS Trigonometry Test.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321:1–6. IOP Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022104.
.jpg){kind=small}
