Analisis kemampuan argumentasi matematis siswa pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the research is to determine the level of students' argumentation ability to solve surface area and volume problems based on students' initial mathematical abilities. This research focused to discover new things that students do in solving problems based on the level of Toulmin argumentation ability. The methodology for taking subjects in this research was purposive, namely by categories of students with high, medium and low abilities, looking at the students' report cards. Students with a high level of initial argumentation can state claims, evidence and reasoning well but are less able to provide rebuttals. Students with a medium initial level of argumentation are only able to state claims and data well. Meanwhile, students with a low level of initial argumentation always make wrong claims and are not able to show evidence, reasoning and rebuttal to support their claims. High entry level students' argumentation abilities are at level 2 except for the rebuttal component, the rebuttal component is at level 0 where students tend to be unable to make counterclaims and unable to reject false statements. Students' argumentation abilities are not all students' initial argumentation abilities are at level 1, where students' ability to make claims and evidence is at level 2 while the ability to make rebuttals is at level 0. Students' initial argumentation abilities are low at level 0 where students are not able make claims, evidence, reasoning, and rebuttal well.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Admoko, S. D. (2021). Bibliometric profile of science education research on argumentation and the contribution of Indonesia. Advances in Engineering Research, 209.
Agustiningsih, D. (2021). The effectiveness of modified flip-based argumentation learning in improving students’ argumentation skills about hydrocarbon. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13.
Alegado, K., & Lewis, A. (2018). The four elements of the claim, evidence, reasoning, and rebuttal (CERR) framework. Science Scope, 41(5), 72–78.
Anggito, A. dan Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. CVJejak.
AR, A. N. J., Juniati, D., & Sulaiman, R. (2018). Students’ argumentation for solving geometry in junior high school. Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018).
Hendri, S., & Defianti, A. (2015). Membentuk keterampilan argumentasi siswa melalui isu sosial ilmiah dalam pembelajaran sains. Prosiding Simposium Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 2015(Snips), 545–548.
Indrawati, K. A.D., & Febrilia, B. A. (2019). Pola argumentasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal sistem persamaan linier tiga variabel (SPLTV). FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5.
Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. (2018). Analysis of the Students’ argumentation based on the level of ability: Study on the process of mathematical proof. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012156
Parico, A. D., & Layco, E. P. (2020). A descriptive analysis of the critical thinking and argumentation skills of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(8), 422–434.
Nisa’, K. (2017). Profil kemampuan argumentasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari aktualisasi diri siswa. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Noviyanti, N. I. D. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241.
Nurinda, S. D. (2017). Enhancing high school students’s rebuttals as an important aspect of scientific argumentation skill through problem based learning. 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICoMSE 2017), 218.
Purnamasari, I., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi SPLDV ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 207.
Rosdiana, L., Hidayati, M. S. N., Qosyim, A., & Mursyidah, R. W. (2021). Analysis of problem solving on the argumentation ability of students under the topic of dynamic electricity. E3S Web of Conferences, 328, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132802011
Rumsey, C. & Langrall, C.W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching children mathematics, 22(7), 412-419
Rusmini. (2021). Development of critical thinking skills and argumentation skills assessment instruments towards 21st-century skills based on non-routine problems. Advance in Engineering Research, 209.
Sholihah, N. U., Sadieda, L. U., & Sutini, S. (2021). Kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah pembuktian kongruensi segitiga ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.1.24-38
Suyono., D. (2021). The validity of the internalized argumentation skills test for chemistry students. E3S Web of Conferences, 328.
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Zulainy, F., Rusdi, R., & Marzal, J. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis realistic mathematics education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 812-828.