Ketika Agama dan Masyarakat Digital Menjadi Senjata Baru Propagada Politik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nineteen months have passed, but the action of the political religious social movements which born post religious sacrilege case on Elections Jakarta turned out to be far from over. The movement originally was a step of consolidation in order to evoke the political consciousness of Muslims, now began to be infiltrated by other groups with particular interests. These interest groups considered to sharpen the conflict and cause the political noise never ended across this country. This article try to expose how the social-political issues played massif and structured in virtual spaces by interest groups in order to form the force and gained the power of politics. And how the relationship between religion, state, and people are pitted in order that the collective identity look sharper. So no wonder that the people of Indonesia now seems to have split in two major axis, Religious versus Nationalist.
Sembilan belas bulan telah berlalu, namun aksi dari gerakan sosial politik religius yang lahir pasca kasus penistaan agama pada Pilkada DKI Jakarta ternyata belumlah usai. Gerakan yang semula merupakan sebuah langkah konsolidasi guna membangkitkan kesadaran politik umat islam, kini mulai ditunggangi oleh kelompok lain dengan kepentingan tertentu. Kelompok kepentingan inilah yang ditengarai memperkeruh konflik dan menyebabkan kegaduhan politik tak kunjung usai di seantero negeri. Artikel ini mencoba memaparkan bagaimana isu-isu sosial politik kemudian dimainkan secara massif dan terstruktur dalam ruang-ruang virtual oleh kelompok kepentingan guna membentuk kekuatan politik dan demi meraih kekuasaan. Serta bagaimana relasi antara agama, rakyat, dan negara dibenturkan agar identitas kolektif terlihat lebih tajam. Maka tak heran jika kini rakyat Indonesia seolah telah terpropaganda dan terbelah dalam dua poros besar, Agamis dan Nasionalis.
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Budiardjo, Miriam. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik-Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fachrudin, Fachri. (2016). Ini Alasan Pemberitaan Pilkada DKI Jakarta Mendominasi. Diakses di http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/12/02/23151391/ini.alasan.pemberitaan.pilkada.dki.jakarta.mendominasi pada tanggal 5 Juli 2018.
Herdiansah, Ari Ganjar dan Junaidi dan Heni Ismiati. (2017). Pembelahan Ideologi, Kontestasi Pemilu dan Persepsi Ancaman Keamanan Nasional Spektrum Politik Indonesia Pasca 2014?. Jurnal Wacana Politik 2(01): 61-73
Hocker, Wilmot. 1985. Komunikasi Massa : Suatu Pengantar. Bandung. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Juditha, Christian. (2017). Sentimen dan Imparsialitas Isi Berita Tetang Ahok di Portal Berita Online. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembagunan 18(01): 57-73.
Krauss, Robert & Ezequiel Morsella. (2006). The Hanbook of Conflict Resolution. Communication and Conflict (144-157). San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Prihadi, Susetyo Dwi. (2017). Ahok Paling Sering Dibicarakan di Media Sosial. Diakses dalam https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20170327103942-185-202952/ahok-paling-sering-dibicarakan-di-media-sosial/ pada tanggal 5 Juli 2018.
Pruitt, D.G., & Rubin, J.Z. 1986. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. New York: Random House.
Sukma, Rizal. (2005). Ethnic Conflicts in Southeast Asia. Ethic Conflict In Indonesia Causes and the Quest for Solution (1-41). Singapura: ISEAS Publication.
Rahardjo,Turnomo. (2012). Literasi Media dan Kearifan Lokal Konsep & Aplikasi. Memahami Literasi Media (Perspekti Teoritis) (1-24). Mata Padi Presindo.
Santosa, Bend Abidin. (2017). Peran Media Massa Dalam Mencegah Konflik. Jurnal ASPIKOM 3(2): 199-214.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1978). The Structurer of Sosiology Theory. Homewood, III. The Dorsey Press.