Social Construction of the Power Relations of Sole Parenting of Nyai in the Solo Raya Pesantren

Authors

  • Ulfa Fauzia Argestya a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:28:"UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta";}
  • Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Siti Fathonah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Keywords:

social construction, power relations, Nyai, Parenting, Pesantren

Abstract

The position of women remains a sensitive topic, both within and beyond the Pesantren. This research aims to examine the social construction of the power relations of the Nyai whose Kiai has left behind. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method with snowball sampling. Data collection techniques use interviews, documentation, and observation. The subjects in this study were 4 Nyai from Singoludiro Islamic Boarding School, Al Mubarrok Islamic Boarding School in Boyolali, Qoshul Qur'an Islamic Boarding School in Klaten, and Nyai Al Muayyad Islamic Boarding School in Solo. Social construction consists of three stages. First, externalization occurred during the adjustment period following Kiai's marriage. Second, the objectification stage is carried out by considering the needs of the Pesantren. Nyai then continued Kiai's public role as a wife. It is a sign that a devoted wife must continue Kiai's struggle. The third stage of internalization occurs when Nyai is fully aware of Nyai's position as the sole caregiver in the Pesantren. The parenting pattern used by Nyai is still the same as the Pesantren criteria in providing complete care for Kiai and Nyai. What differs is that the actor caring for him is now a single actor. The connection between power relations and knowledge production is shown in various forms. It can be seen from Nyai that inherent capital, such as capital, cultural capital, and intellectual capital, can produce knowledge according to their basic abilities. This ability was developed through the production process that Nyai and Kiai underwent while living together and through the initial skills they had when managing their care in the past. The notable finding is that Nyai's parenting patterns tend to mirror those adopted from Kiai.

Abstract viewed: 0 times | PDF downloaded = 0 times

References

Alfanani, Tsabita Shabrina. 2017. “Konstruksi Sosial Komunitas Pesantren Mengenai Isu Radikalisme (Studi Kasus Pada Pesantren Salaf & Modern Di Kota Malang).” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama 10, no. 2: 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2016.1002-01.

Bungin, Burhan. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media.

Dhofier, Zamaksyari. 2015. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kiai Dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Engkus, K. 2009. Metode Penelitian Fenomenologi: Konsepsi, Pedoman, Dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjadjaran.

Fauziah, Nine, and Stevani Afrizal. 2021. “Sosietas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi.” Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Dalam Keharmonisan Keluarga 10, no. 1: 974. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/handle/123456789/20498%0Ahttps://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/20498/artikel sosietas upi.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writing. Harvester.

Hambali, Hambali. 2017. “Pendidikan Adil Gender Di Pondok Pesantren (Studi Tentang Membangun Gender Awareness Di Pondok Pesantren Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo).” Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan 4, no. 2: 167–87. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v4i2.16.

Kusdiana, Ading. 2017. Sejarah Pesantren. Bandung: Humaniora.

Laksono, Puji. 2017. “Konstruksi Gender Di Pesantren (Studi Kualitatif Pada Santriwati Di Pesantren Nurul Ummah Mojokerto).” Lakon : Jurnal Kajian Sastra Dan Budaya 6, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.20473/lakon.v6i1.6791.

Machmudi, Yon. 2005. Partai Keadilan Sejahtera. Wajah Baru Islam Politik Indonesia. Bandung: Harakatuna Publishing.

Marhumah. 2012. “Konstruksi Gender, Hegemoni Kekuasaan, Dan Lembaga Pendidikan.” KARSA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) 19, no. 2: 167–82. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v19i2.64.

McNay, L. 1992. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Northeastern University Press.

Muhammad, Husein. 2014. “Islam Dan Pendidikan Perempuan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 3, no. 2: 231–44. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2014.32.231-244.

Prasetiawan, A. Y., and S. Lis. 2019. “Kepemimpinan Perempuan Dalam Pesantren.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender Dan Anak 14, no. 1: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v14i1.2874.

Prasetiawan, Ahmad Yusuf, and Safitri Lis. 2019. “Kepemimpinan Perempuan Dalam Pesantren.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender Dan Anak 14, no. 1: 39–69. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v14i1.2874.

Rouse, Joseph. 2006. “Power/Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, edited by Gary Gutting. Indiana. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521840821.

Salim, Luthfi. 2020. “Kontruksi Sosial Gender Di Pesantren Studi Kesenjangan Antara Laki-Laki Dengan Perempuan.” Socio Religia 1, no. 2: 1–17.

Sumadi, S. 2017. “Islam Dan Seksualitas: Bias Gender Dalam Humor Pesantren.” El Harakah 19, no. 1: 21–40. https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v19i1.3914.

Supriadi, Endang. 2014. “Kekuasaan Kyai Dalam Komunitas Pesantren Khusus Waria Senin-Kamis Al-Fatah Notoyudan Pringgokusuman Gedongtengen Yogyakarta,” 23–36.

Tamam, Baddrut. 2015. Pesantren, Nalar Dan Tradisi: Geliat Santri Menghadapi ISIS, Terorisme Dan Transnasionalisme Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

“Wawancara Nyai Ari Hikmawati.” 2024.

“Wawancara Ustazah Umi.” 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Argestya, U. F., Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi, & Siti Fathonah. (2025). Social Construction of the Power Relations of Sole Parenting of Nyai in the Solo Raya Pesantren. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 19(2), 162–178. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/SosiologiAgama/article/view/6097

Issue

Section

Articles