Mengulas Peran Imajinasi dalam Pencarian Kebenaran dan Keyakinan Perspektif Immanuel Kant dan Cornelius Castoriadis

Dinar Indah Guniarti; Komarudin Sassi

doi:10.14421/ref.v24i1.5832

Authors

Dinar Indah Guniarti Institut Agama Islam Al-Qur'an Al-Ittifaqiah (IAIQ) Indralaya Sumatra Selatan
Komarudin Sassi Institut Agama Islam Al-Qur’an Al-Ittifaqiah (IAIQI) Indralaya Sumatera Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.v24i1.5832

Keywords:

Immanuel Kant, filsafat, Kornelius Castoriadis, Epistemologi, Ontologi

Abstract

This research aims to examine the extent to which imagination plays a role in the search for truth and the formation of human beliefs, with a focus on the perspective of Immanuel Kant and Cornelius Castoriadis. Kant, within the framework of his critical philosophy, underscores the central role of imagination in shaping our aesthetic, moral and knowledge experiences. Imagination, for him, is the power of synthesis that connects empirical data with pure concepts of reason. Meanwhile, Castoriadis sees imagination as a creative force that underlies the formation of society and individual identity. Imagination, in Castoriadis's perspective, is the source of all social institutions, values and norms. This study will carry out an in-depth comparison between Kant's and Castoriadis' views regarding the role of imagination. It is hoped that this comparative analysis will reveal the points of contact and differences between the two philosophers, as well as provide a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of imagination in human life. This research uses a conceptual analysis approach to analyze and compare the ideas of the two philosophers. In this way, it is hoped that it can contribute to philosophical studies regarding epistemology, especially regarding the formation of knowledge and reality. Apart from that, this study is also relevant to the study of social philosophy, because imagination has a central role in the formation of society and collective identity.

Abstract viewed: 25 times |

PDF downloaded = 6 times

References

Adams, S. (n.d.). Castoriadis’s Ontology. In Being and Creation. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9780823291106

Antic, A., Abarca-Brown, G., Moghnieh, L., & Rajpal, S. (2023). Toward a new relationship between history and global mental health. SSM - Mental Health, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100265

Anzaldúa-Arce, R. E. (2023). Cornelius Castoriadis: una mirada sobre lo imaginario. FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2023.4.2.260

Cassirer, H. W. (2020). The Critique of Pure Reason. In A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Judgment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073369-2

de Boer, K. (2024). Why Did Kant Conceive of the Critique of Pure Reason as a Critique? Comments on Gabriele Gava’s Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and the Method of Metaphysics. In Kantian Review (Vol. 29, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941542300050X

Finn, E., Torrejon Capurro, C., Bennett, M. G., & Wylie, R. (2023). Applied imagination. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275942

Fours, V. (2023). THE DYNAMIC CONCEPTION OF THE SOCIAL IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF CORNELIUS CASTORIADIS. Topos, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.61095/1815-0047-2023-1-105-120

Franco, I. G. (2022). Imagining future ecologies: Kantian imagination across generations. Artnodes, 2022(29). https://doi.org/10.7238/artnodes.v0i29.393022

Gomez, A. A. (2020). Cornelius Castoriadis’ sociohistorical world ontology. The problem of social imaginary significations’ site. Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, 9(16).

Hall, J. M. (2019). Imaginatively Grounded Figures: Dancing with Castoriadis. PhaenEx, 13(1), 86–115. https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v13i1.5054

Holik, A. (2011). Epistemologi Immanuel Kant. Jurnal Filsafat, 76.

Judson, G. (2023). Cultivating Leadership Imagination with Cognitive Tools: An Imagination-Focused Approach to Leadership Education. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751211022028

Madani, A., Putra Tanoto, F., & Halwati, N. (2022). Immanuel Kant dan Pemikiran Filsafatnya.

Martín, F. R. (2023). From the Critique of Pure Reason to Being and Time. The Influence of Kant’s Philosophical Project on Martin Heidegger. Studia Heideggeriana, 12. https://doi.org/10.46605/sh.vol12.2023.207

Matherne, S. (2024). 1Introduction. In S. Matherne (Ed.), Seeing More: Kant’s Theory of Imagination (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999291.003.0001

McNulty, M. B. (2022). A science for gods, a science for humans: Kant on teleological speculations in natural history. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 94, 47–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.04.008

Ménissier, T. (2022). Innovation, from Industrial Consumption to the Reinvention of Socialization: a Reflection on a Recent Semantic Enrichment. Philosophy and Technology, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00563-x

Milanish, Y. (2017). OPPORTUNITIES OF RATIONAL EMOTIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY IN WORKING WITH MOTHERS OF NEWBORNS WITH INTRAVENTRICULAR HEMORRHAGE AND HYPOXIC-ISCHEMIC CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURY. 4th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS Proceedings4th, Science and Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/32/s11.030

Moore, M. L., & Milkoreit, M. (2020). Imagination and transformations to sustainable and just futures. Elementa, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.081

Murphy, P. (2022a). Immanuel Kant’s Monograms of the Imagination. Critical Horizons, 23(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2021.1957363

Murphy, P. (2022b). Immanuel Kant’s Monograms of the Imagination. Critical Horizons, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2021.1957363

O’Sullivan, M. (2017). Critique of Pure Reason. In Critique of Pure Reason. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281916

Outhwaite, W. (2024). Critical Symposium on Christoforos Bouzanis, Social Imaginary and the Metaphysical Discourse (Abingdon: Routledge, 2023). Innovation in the Social Sciences, 2(2), 235–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/27730611-bja10027

Perkins-McVey, M. (2022). Kant, intoxicated: the aesthetics of drunkenness, between moral duty and “active play.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00530-x

RA. Ataswarin Oetopo et al. (2021). Jurnal Imajinasi. Jurnal Imajinasi, 10(2), 153–158.

Rudek, T. J. (2022). Capturing the invisible. Sociotechnical imaginaries of energy. The critical overview. Science and Public Policy, 49(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab076

Rundell, J. (2020). Kant on the Imagination: Fanciful and Unruly, or “an Indispensable Dimension of the Human Soul.” Critical Horizons, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2020.1759281

Sabolius, K. (2020). Reality, Determination, Imagination. Open Philosophy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0122

Sassi, K. (2020). "Principles of Islamic Education Epistemology Paradigm of Monotheism Naquib al-Attas." Millah, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol20.iss1.art6

Sassi, K. (2021). Ontology of Islamic Education Paradigm of Tauhid Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas: Revitalizing Adab-Ta'dib in Education. (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Kencana.

Sassi, K., & Azzahra, H. (n.d.) (2023). "A Comparative Study of the Complexity of Sacred Values of the World’s Religions: A Multidisciplinary Perspective." JIU, 10(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.v10i2.39082.

Schulz, C. (2023). A new algorithmic imaginary. Media, Culture and Society, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221136014

Stratmann, J. (2024). The Grounds of a Critique of Pure Reason. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 102(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2023.2248476

Thompson, J. B. (2023). Castoriadis on the Imaginary Institution of Society. In Oxford Readers Class. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192892522.003.0019

van den Berg, H. (2024). Explanation, teleology, and analogy in natural history and comparative anatomy around 1800: Kant and Cuvier. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 105, 109–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.003

Windegger, F., & Spash, C. L. (2023). Reconceptualising freedom in the 21st century: neoliberalism vs. degrowth. New Political Economy, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2149719

Zaitev, E. (2018). The memory and the ailing imagination at immanuel Kant. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3726/cul.2018.01.07