ANALISIS KONTEKS SITUASI DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI

Eni Sugiharyanti

Abstract


One of the specialized varieties of language which is known in human communication is the language of law. This variety of language can be found in some documents such as regulations, bills, and court’s decree. A decree uses special register whose existence is influenced by the context of situation, i.e. the field of discourse, the tenor, and the mode. These three dimensions of the context of situation in a decree released by the Supreme Court are the objects of this research. Conducting research on the context of situation of a text is important because by understanding the context we can understand the whole meaning of a text. The researcher used qualitative research methods to reveal the context of situation of the text of this legal language variety. The primary data are derived from the Supreme Court’s decree Number 210 K/Ag/ 2014, and they are analyzed using Systemic Functional Linguistics theory by Halliday and Eggins to answer the research problems. The research found that the context of the situation consisting of field, tenor and mode plays an important role in the realization of the text. These three dimensions are interrelated to build a discourse of a text.


Keywords


language of law, Supreme Court’s decree, Systemic Functional Linguistics, context of situation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bacalu, Filip. 2012. “Being Creative with the Syntax of Legal Language.” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice IV (1): 610–17.

Bartlett, Tom. 2013. “‘I’ll Manage the Context’:1 Context, Environment and the Potential for Institutional Change.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, disunting oleh Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, dan Gerard OGrady, 342–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97811 39583077.021.

Beasley, Colin J. 1994. “Picking up the Principles: An Applied Linguistic Analysis of the Legal Problem Genre.” Edith Cowan University.

Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. California: SAGE Publications.

D’Almeida, L Duarte. 2011. “Legal Statements and Normative Language.” Law and Philosophy 30 (2): 167–99.

De Carvalho Figueiredo, Debora. 2004. “Representations of Rape the Discourse of Legal Decisions.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis Studies in Social Change, disunting oleh Lynne Young dan Claire Harrison. London; New York: Continuum. http://site.ebrary.com/id/ 10224716.

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2nd Edition. New York: Continuum.

Freddi, Maria. 2013. “Choice and Language Variation: Some Theoretical Reflections.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, disunting oleh Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, dan Gerard O'Grady, 56–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.005.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, dan Jonathan Webster, ed. 2009. “An Introduction to Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics.” Dalam Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London ; New York: Continuum.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

———. 1992. Bahasa, Konteks, dan Teks: Aspek-Aspek Bahasa dalam Pandangan Semiotik Sosial. Diterjemahkan oleh Asruddin Barori Tou. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hukumonline. 2017. “Cara Mudah Memahami Seluk Beluk Putusan Pengadilan.” hukumonline.com. 6 Mei 2017. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt590cca91d8a94/cara-mudah-memahami-seluk-beluk-putusan-pengadilan.

Matthiessen, Christian, Marvin Lam, dan Kazuhiro Teruya. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Morley, G. David. 2000. Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Sudarjo, Sri. 2017. “Analisis Kesalahan Bahasa pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 4/PUU-XI/2013.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa 2 (1): 178–95. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.1.56.178-195.

Syahrani, Riduan. 1987. Buku materi dasar hukum acara perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. New York: Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2019.03103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Eni Sugiharyanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



ISSN: 2549-1482 (p); 2549-2047 (e)

Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, Accreditation Number (Ministry of RTHE/DIKTI): 10/E/KPT/2019

Indexed by:

                

Adabiyyāt Office:

Faculty of Adab and Cultural Sciences Building, 3rd Floor
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Jl. Marsda Adisucipto Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
Telephone Number: +62-274-513949
e-mailadabiyyat@uin-suka.ac.id
http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/adab/Adabiyyat/
 

Creative Commons License

All Publications by Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.