ANALISIS KONTEKS SITUASI DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2019.03103Keywords:
language of law, Supreme Court’s decree, Systemic Functional Linguistics, context of situationAbstract
One of the specialized varieties of language which is known in human communication is the language of law. This variety of language can be found in some documents such as regulations, bills, and court’s decree. A decree uses special register whose existence is influenced by the context of situation, i.e. the field of discourse, the tenor, and the mode. These three dimensions of the context of situation in a decree released by the Supreme Court are the objects of this research. Conducting research on the context of situation of a text is important because by understanding the context we can understand the whole meaning of a text. The researcher used qualitative research methods to reveal the context of situation of the text of this legal language variety. The primary data are derived from the Supreme Court’s decree Number 210 K/Ag/ 2014, and they are analyzed using Systemic Functional Linguistics theory by Halliday and Eggins to answer the research problems. The research found that the context of the situation consisting of field, tenor and mode plays an important role in the realization of the text. These three dimensions are interrelated to build a discourse of a text.
Downloads
References
Bacalu, Filip. 2012. “Being Creative with the Syntax of Legal Language.” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice IV (1): 610–17.
Bartlett, Tom. 2013. “‘I’ll Manage the Context’:1 Context, Environment and the Potential for Institutional Change.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, disunting oleh Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, dan Gerard OGrady, 342–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97811 39583077.021.
Beasley, Colin J. 1994. “Picking up the Principles: An Applied Linguistic Analysis of the Legal Problem Genre.” Edith Cowan University.
Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. California: SAGE Publications.
D’Almeida, L Duarte. 2011. “Legal Statements and Normative Language.” Law and Philosophy 30 (2): 167–99.
De Carvalho Figueiredo, Debora. 2004. “Representations of Rape the Discourse of Legal Decisions.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis Studies in Social Change, disunting oleh Lynne Young dan Claire Harrison. London; New York: Continuum. http://site.ebrary.com/id/ 10224716.
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2nd Edition. New York: Continuum.
Freddi, Maria. 2013. “Choice and Language Variation: Some Theoretical Reflections.” Dalam Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, disunting oleh Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, dan Gerard O'Grady, 56–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.005.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, dan Jonathan Webster, ed. 2009. “An Introduction to Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics.” Dalam Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London ; New York: Continuum.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
———. 1992. Bahasa, Konteks, dan Teks: Aspek-Aspek Bahasa dalam Pandangan Semiotik Sosial. Diterjemahkan oleh Asruddin Barori Tou. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hukumonline. 2017. “Cara Mudah Memahami Seluk Beluk Putusan Pengadilan.” hukumonline.com. 6 Mei 2017. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt590cca91d8a94/cara-mudah-memahami-seluk-beluk-putusan-pengadilan.
Matthiessen, Christian, Marvin Lam, dan Kazuhiro Teruya. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Morley, G. David. 2000. Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Sudarjo, Sri. 2017. “Analisis Kesalahan Bahasa pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 4/PUU-XI/2013.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa 2 (1): 178–95. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.1.56.178-195.
Syahrani, Riduan. 1987. Buku materi dasar hukum acara perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Eni Sugiharyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra publishes all articles entirely in full text.
- It is permissible for readers to download and to use it for scientific purposes and scientific dissemination.
- The author can re-publish the article that has been published by the Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra after obtaining written permission from the editor. This letter can be obtained by submitting a request letter for permission to republish the article to Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra via email adabiyyat@uin-suka.ac.id. In the second publication, the author is required to include information that the article was firstly published by the Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra.
