DECONSTRUCTION OF THE PATRIARCHAL MYTH OF ADAM AND EVE  IN CONTEMPORARY ARABIC LITERATURE

المؤلفون

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2025.090101

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Myth of Adam and Eve، deconstruction، patriarchy، Arabic literature، Arab women’s autonomy

الملخص

This study aims to highlight Arab women’s autonomy by elaborating the feminist meaning in the literary code that challenges the patriarchal myth of Adam and Eve in three contemporary Arabic literary works. Through a feminist literary criticism approach, this study reveals the form of deconstruction and criticism of the binary opposition. Hence, Eve (woman) becomes a complete subject who gives birth and not who is born. The narrative-symbolic argument of these works is based on historical-logical-scientific and theological-rationalistic thinking styles. The purpose of the deconstruction in them is to create the autonomy of women with noble dignity as human beings, as men are. The deconstruction reflects the thought of progressive muslim authors who believe in and advocate for the substantive value of the holy Koran, particularly its emphasis on egalitarianism in the myth of Adam and Eve.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

السيرة الشخصية للمؤلف

  • Yulia Nasrul Latifi، Scopus ID: 57217291319 | Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

    SINTA: Science and Technology Index | click here

    Google Scholar | H-index [4] Citation [55] | click here

    Research Interests

    • Literatures
    • Philosophy
    • Islamic Studies

المراجع

Abduh, Muhammad. n.d. Al-Manār. Vol. Al-Juz al-Rābi’. Beirūt: Dār al-Ma’rifah.

Adújar, Ndeye. 2013. ‘Feminist Readings of the Qur‘an: Social, Political, and Religious Implications’. In Muslima Theology, edited by Ednan Aslan, Marcia Hermansen, and Elif Medeni, 59–80. The Voices of Muslim Women Theologians. Peter Lang AG. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2t4f10.7.

Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. 2016. Strukturalisme Levi Strauss Mitos Dan Karya Sastra. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.

Al-Iskandari, Ahmad, and Musthofa Anany. 1978. Al Wasīṭ al Adab al’Arabiy Wa Tārīkhuh. Misr: Dār al Ma’ārif.

Al-Malāikah, Nāzik. 1997. Ṡalj Wa Nār: Dīwān Nāzik al- Malāikah. Vol. Al Mujald al Tsāniy. Beirūt: Dār al-‘Audah.

Al-Marāghī, Aḥmad Musṭafā. n.d. Tafsīr Al-Marāgī. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Qāsyī, Imām al-Syaykh Bahā’ al-Dīn Ḥaydar Ibn Ali. 1971. Tafsīr Al-Qāsyī al-Mu’tamad Min al-Manqūl Fī Mā Auḥā Ilā al-Rasūl. Beirūt. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Sa’dawi, Nawal. 1980. The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World. Edited by Sherif Hetata. London: Zed Books.

Al-Sa’dawi, Nawal, and Hibah Ra’ūf Izzat. 2000. Al-Mar’ah Wa al-Dīn, Wa al-Akhlāq. Damaskus, Suriyah: Dār al-Fikr.

Altmann, Alexander. 1945. ‘The Gnostic Background of the Rabbinic Adam Legends’. The Jewish Quarterly Review 35 (4): 371–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1452657.

Arenberg, Meg. 2015. ‘Rethinking Hawaa: Gender in Abdilatif Abdalla’s Utenzi Wa Maisha Ya Adamu Na Hawaa through the Lens of John Milton’s Paradise Lost’. Research in African Literatures 46 (3): 24–45. https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.46.3.24.

Bazi’, Syawqi. 2018. ‘Nāzik Al-Malāikah Tantaṣir Li-al Anūṡah “al-Muqayyadah” Bi al-Syi’r al Hurr’. 27 June 2018. https://aawsat.com/home/article/1312491.

Bukhārī. n.d.-a. Matan Al- Bukhārī al-Masykūl. Lil’allāmah al-Mudaqqiq Abī ‘Abd Allāh Muhammad Bin Ismā’Il al-Bukhārī Raḍiya Allāh ‘anh Wa Ardāh. Vol. Al-Juz al-Rābi’. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr.

———. n.d.-b. Matan Al- Bukhārī al-Masykūl. Lil’allāmah al-Mudaqqiq Abī ‘Abd Allāh Muhammad Bin Ismā’Il al-Bukhārī Raḍiya Allāh ‘anh Wa Ardāh. Vol. Al-Juz al-Ṡāliṡ. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2013. Metodologi Kritik Sastra. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Engels, Friedrich. 2011. Asal-Usul Kepemilikan Pribadi Dan Negara. Translated by Vidi. Jakarta: Kalyanamitra.

Engineer, Asghar Ali. 2007. Pembebasan Perempuan. Translated by Agus Nuryanto. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Faruk. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sastra Sebuah Penjelajahan Awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Farukh, Umar. 1998. Al-Manhaj al Jadīd Fī al Adab al ‘Arabiy. Beirūt: Dār al ‘Ilm li al Malayīn.

Hadromi-Allouche, Zohar. 2012. ‘The Death and Life of the Devil’s Son: A Literary Analysis of a Neglected Tradition’. Studia Islamica 107 (2): 157–83. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341244.

Hanawy, Nādiyah. 2019. ‘Nāzik al-Malāikah al Tamarrus al Niswiyyi fī al-Naqd al-Adaby’. Majallah al-Jadīd. 2019. https://www.aljadeedmagazine.com.

Hassan, Riffat, and Fatima Mernissi. 1995. ‘Setara Di Hadapan Allah Relasi Laki-Laki Dan Perempuan’. In Tradisi Islam Pasca Patriarkhi. Yogyakarta: LSPPA Yayasan Prakarsa.

Ibn Kasīr. 1991. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-‘Adīm. Al-Juz al-Awwal. Beirūt: Maktabah al-Nūr al-Ilmiyah.

Iqbal, Salwa. 2021. ‘The Matriarch, the Marxist, and the Radical: The Suffragettes of 20th Century Egypt’. Thesis for A Master’s Degree, Canada: Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto.

Irwandar. 2003. Demitologisasi Adam Dan Hawa. Yogyakarta: ar-Ruzz Media.

Latifi, Yulia Nasrul. 2003. ‘Kritik Sastra Feminis (Sebuah Pengenalan Awal)’. In Sastra & Budaya Dalam Evolusi, edited by Khairon Nahdiyyin, Hanif Anwari, and Habib, 159–85. Yogyakarta: Adab Press.

———. 2020a. ‘Kritik Nawal Al-Sa’dawi Terhadap Konstruksi Wacana Agama Tentang Relasi Gender Dalam Suqut al-Imam, Adab Am Qillah Adab, Dan Zinah (Pendekatan Subjektivitas) [Nawal al-Sa’dawi’s Criticism of Religious Discourse Construction in Suqut al-Imam, Adab Am Qillah Adab, Dan Zinah: A Subjectivity Approach], Dissertation, Faculty of Cultural Sciences’. Disertation, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

———. 2020b. ‘The Destruction of the Symbolic of Patriarchal Construction of Discourse on Religion in the Novel Suquth Al-Imam By Nawal al-Sa’dawi’. In Globalization & Humanities Making Sense of Islamic Culture in the Contemporary World, 19–31. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Adab and Cultural Sciences UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. http://aiconics.uin-suka.ac.id/id/page/prodi/1226-AICONICS-Proceedings.

Latifi, Yulia Nasrul, and Wening Udasmoro. 2020. ‘The Big Other Gender, Patriarki, Dan Wacana Agama Dalam Karya Sastra Nawāl Al-Sa’dāwī [The Big Other of Gender, Patriarchy, and Religious Discourse]’. Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 19 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2020.191.1-20.

Latifi, Yulia Nasrul, Wening Udasmoro, and Juliasih J. 2019. ‘The Subjectivity of Nawāl Al-Sa’dāwī: Critique on Gender Relations in Religious Construction in Adab Am Qillah Adab Work’. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 57 (2): 257–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.572.257-286.

Layton, Scott C. 1997. ‘Remarks on the Canaanite Origin of Eve’. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 59 (1): 22–32.

Lybarger, Loren D. 2008. ‘The Demise of Adam in the “Qiṣaṣ al-Anbiyā’:” The Symbolic Politics of Death and Re-Burial in the Islamic “Stories of the Prophets”’. Numen 55 (5): 497–535.

Majīd, Murtadhā. 2007. ‘Muqtabas Min Ḥayāh Al-Syā’ir al-Raḥīlah Nāzik al-Malāikah’. Al-Īlāf. 2007. https://elaph.com/Web/ElaphLiterature/2007/6/242314.htm.

Mernissi, Fatima. 1994. Wanita Di Dalam Islam. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.

Muhyiddin, Muhammad. 2006. Asal Usul Manusia, Adam Atau Pithecanthropus Erectus Nenek Moyang Kita? Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.

Muizuddin, Moch. 2014. ‘Perkembangan Sastra Arab Kontemporer’. Tsaqofah 12 (2): 150–62. https://doi.org/10.32678/tsaqofah.v12i2.3508.

Nahdiyyin, Khairon. 2019. ‘Representasi Perempuan dalam Bahasa Arab (Perspektif Feminisme atas Relasi Gender dan Bahasa)’. Doctoral Thesis, Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/51837/.

Naqrah, Iltihāmī. 1971. Sīkūlūjiyyah Al-Qiṣṣah Fī al-Qur’ān. Risālah Duktūrah Jāmi’ah al-Jazāir.

Panikkar, R. 1979. Myth, Faith and Hermeneutics Cross-Cultural Studies. USA: Paulist Press New York/Ramsey/Toronto.

Qabbānī, Nizār. 1981. Al Mar’ah Fī Syi’rī Wa Fī Ḥayātī. http://www.noor-book.com/en/ebook.

———. 1983. Qiṣṣatī Ma’a al-Syi’r. http://www.noor-book.com/en/ebook.

———. 1989. Hākażā Aktub Tārīkh Al-Nisā’. Al-Ṭab’ah al-Khāmisah Nīsān (Abrīl). http://www.noor-book.com/en/ebook.

———. 1993. Uḥibbuki Uḥibbuki Wa al Bāqiyyah Ta’tī. Al-Ṭab’ah al-Sābi’ah Nīsān (Abrīl). Nizarqabbany.cjb.net.

Reed, Evelyn. 2011. Evolusi Perempuan Dari Klan Matriarka Menuju Keluarga Patriarkal. Edited by Hegel Terome. Translated by Perempuan Mahardhika. Jakarta: Kalyanamitra.

Revard, Stella P. 2005. ‘From Metanoia to Apocalypse: “Paradise Lost” and the Apocryphal “Lives of Adam and Eve”’. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 104 (1): 80–102.

Ruthven, K.K. 1984. Feminist Literary Studies: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

al-Sa’dāwī, Nawāl. 1974. Al-Untsā Hiya al-Aṣl, Al Mamlakah al-Muttaḥidah. Muassasah hindawy Sy Ay Sy.

———. 2010. Zīnah. Beirūt: Dār al-Sāqī.

Sharma, Arvind, ed. 2006. Perempuan Dalam Agama-Agama Dunia. Translated by Ade Alimah. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Showalter, Elaine, ed. 1985. The New Feminist Criticism, Essays on Women Literature and Theory. New York: Pantheon.

Siegel, James. 1966. ‘Prayer and Play in Atjeh: A Comment on Two Photographs’. Indonesia, no. 1, 2–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350781.

Siswantoro. 2010. Metode Penelitian Sastra Analisis Struktur Puisi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Spellberg, D. A. 1996. ‘Writing the Unwritten Life of the Islamic Eve: Menstruation and the Demonization of Motherhood’. International Journal of Middle East Studies 28 (3): 305–24.

Syahin, Abdus Shabur. 2004. Penciptaan Adam Mitos Atau Realitas. Translated by Hanif Anwari. Yogyakarta: eLSAQ.

Ṭaha, Mahmud Muhammad. 1969. Al-Risālah al-Ṡāniyah Min al-Islām. Vol. al-Ṭab’ah al-Rābi’ah.

Young, Katherine K. 2006. ‘Pengantar’. In Perempuan Dalam Agama-Agama Dunia, edited by Arvind Sharma, translated by Ade Alimah. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Zamakhsyārī, Ibn al-Qāsim Maḥmūd Ibn Umar. 1996. Al-Kasysyāf an Ḥaqāiq al-Tanzīl Wa ‘Uyūn al-Aqāwil Fī Wujūh al-Ta’Wīl. Vol. Al-Juz al-Awwal. Mesir: Syirkah Maktabah wa Matba’ah.

التنزيلات

منشور

2025-05-29

إصدار

القسم

Articles

كيفية الاقتباس

DECONSTRUCTION OF THE PATRIARCHAL MYTH OF ADAM AND EVE  IN CONTEMPORARY ARABIC LITERATURE. (2025). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2025.090101

المؤلفات المشابهة

1-10 من 151

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.

الأعمال الأكثر قراءة لنفس المؤلف/المؤلفين