EFEKTIVITAS OPAC SEBAGAI SARANA TEMU KEMBALI INFORMASI DI UPT PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAGELANG (UNIMMA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2021.161.80-95Keywords:
information retrieval, OPAC, recall, precisionAbstract
Evaluation of information retrieval tool is very important to find out how far the retrieval system has worked. This study evaluates the OPAC of Muhammadiyah University of Magelang (UNIMMA) by determining the effectiveness of the information retrieval system seen from the relevance of the data displayed with the data requested by the user. This is descriptive quantitative research that calculates the value of recall and precision, while the data collection is conducted through literature studies and documentation. Based on the data collected, it can be concluded that OPAC UNIMMA is in the effective category with a high level of precision, and in the value range of 0.68 - 1.00 with recall and precision values respectively 0.77 or 77% and 0.84 or 84%. However, from the observations on each class number, it is found that the class number has a higher recall value than the precision, ie: the class numbers of 200, 800, and 900.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Indonesia. (n.d.). KBBI Daring. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/evaluasi
Indonesia. (n.d.). Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from https://www.perpusnas.go.id/dictionary.php?lang=id&id=Istilah Perpustakaan
Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang perpustakaan. Sekretariat Negara.
Juniarso, E., & Krismayani, I. (2018). Efektivitas OPAC sebagai sarana temu kembali informasi oleh pemustaka di UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan 7(3), 121-130. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/22925
Lasa-Hs, & Suciati, U. (2017). Kamus kepustakawanan indonesia. Calpulis.
Mirzaqon, A. T., & Purwoko, B. (2018). Studi kepustakaan mengenai landasan teori dan praktik konseling expressive writing. Jurnal BK UNESA, 8(1). https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/253525-studi-kepustakaan-mengenai-landasan-teor-c084d5fa.pdf
Nugroho, F., Muljono, P., & Hermadi, I. (2017). Pengembangan online public access catalog (OPAC) berbasis android pada Perpustakaan UPN “Veteran” Jakarta. EDULIB Journal Of Information Science, 7(2). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edulib/article/view/9196/0
Pendit, P. L. (2017). Recall & precision. https://iperpin.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/recall-precision/
Riduan & Akdon. (2009). Rumus dan data dalam aplikasi statistika. Alfabeta.
Saufa, A. F., & Widayati, J. W. (2017). Evaluasi sistem temu kembali informasi OPAC Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS). Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 5(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v5i2a1
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulistyo-Basuki. (2018). Kamus ilmu perpustakaan dan sains informasi. Sagung Seto.
Suwarno, W. (2011). Perpustakaan dan buku: Wacana penulisan & penerbitan. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Yusuf, A. M. (2015). Metode Penelitian kuantitaif, kualitatif dan penelitian gabungan. Prenada Media Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
