Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif

Agama Faktual: Pertarungan Wacana dan Dinamika Sosiologis Jemaat Ahmadiyah di Indonesia: A Review Essay

Authors

  • Muhammad Ilham Sofyan
    Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta image/svg+xml

Downloads

Article Galley

DOI https://doi.org/10.14421/s4rpqv81
Page: 168-179
78 views
28 PDF Downloads

How to Cite

Agama Faktual: Pertarungan Wacana dan Dinamika Sosiologis Jemaat Ahmadiyah di Indonesia: A Review Essay. (2026). Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 21(1), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.14421/s4rpqv81

Abstract

Extract

State involvement in facilitating freedom of religion and belief (FoRB) has created a safe and conflict-free space for society, especially religious communities. However, state supremacy is also effective in constructing a single religious narrative, creating a dualism between the strong and the weak, or the majority and the minority. This power system enables the state to play a hegemonic role through normalisation and marginalisation, including in relation to FoRB. This debate is explored in this book, set against the social and theological backdrop of the Ahmadiyah community in Indonesia. Mochamad Sodik and Bernando J. Sujibto explore how state supremacy has made the Ahmadiyah a marginalized minority group through a single narrative. Based on sociological analysis, this book adopts a chronological framework to highlight the shift in discourse from contestation to theological discrimination, which has implications for intolerant actions and violence against the Ahmadiyah.This book carefully analyses the issue of Ahmadiyah as a minority and target of intimidation and violence, which did not occur naturally, but involved a structured and solid dominant power. The book’s urgency is evident in its success in shifting the issue of Ahmadiyah, which initially focused on theological judgment, toward a sociological conversation. Additionally, the use of accommodative social theory, supported by extensive data analysis, underscores the primary publication’s significance.

 

References:

Alnizar, Fariz. 2019. “Pretext for Religious Violence in Indonesia: An Anthropolinguistic Analysis of Fatwas on Ahmadiyya.” Studia Islamika 26(3): 417–444. doi: 10.36712/sdi.v26i3.8719

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. 2019. Membatasi tanpa melanggar: hak kebebasan beragama atau berkeyakinan. Edisi pertama. Pogung, Yogyakarta: CRCS UGM.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. 2022. Politik moderasi dan kebebasan beragama: suatu tinjauan kritis. Cetakan pertama. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Bruinessen, Martin van, ed. 2014. Conservative turn: Islam Indonesia dalam ancaman fundamentalisme. Cetakan I. Bandung: Al-Mizan.

Burhani, Ahmad Najib. 2014a. “Hating the Ahmadiyya: The Place of ‘Heretics’ in Contemporary Indonesian Muslim Society.” Contemporary Islam 8(2):133–52. doi:10.1007/s11562-014-0295-x.

Burhani, Ahmad Najib. 2014b. “Treating Minorities with Fatwas: A Study of the Ahmadiyya Community in Indonesia.” Contemporary Islam 8(3):285–301. doi:10.1007/s11562-013-0278-3.

Burhani, Ahmad Najib. 2021. “‘It’s a Jihad’: Justifying Violence towards the Ahmadiyya in Indonesia.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia 9(1):99–112. doi: 10.1017/trn.2020.8

Detik News. 2011. Ormas Islam Sepakat Ahmadiyah Harus Dibubarkan. Jakarta: Detik. (https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1599581/ormas-islam-sepakat-ahmadiyah-harus-dibubarkan).

Durkheim, Émile. 2008. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2009. Archaeology of Knowledge. 1st publ., repr. Routledge Classics. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Hanson, John H. 2009. “Modernity, Religion and Development in Ghana: The Example of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.” Ghana Studies 12(1):55–75. doi: 10.3368/gs.12-13.1.55.

Hassan, Sumeera. 2025. “Reproducing and Performing Diaspora through Ijtema: The Ahmadiyya Community in Finland.” Journal of Muslims in Europe 14(3):282–306. doi:10.1163/22117954-bja10133.

Irawan, Andi Muhammad, and Zifirdaus Adnan. 2021. “The Ahmadiyya, Blasphemy and Religious Freedom: The Institutional Discourse Analysis of Religious Discrimination in Indonesia.” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 18(1):79–102. doi:10.1515/mwjhr-2020-0034.

Kompas. 2026. “Pembubaran Kemah Remaja Ahmadiyah Di Karanganyar Dikecam Sejumlah Pihak.” (https://www.kompas.id/artikel/pembubaran-kemah-remaja-ahmadiyah-di-karanganyar-dikecam-sejumlah-pihak).

Lyotard, Jean-François. 2005. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Repr. Theory and History of Literature. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Pr.

Putri, Pradnya Nindita. 2023. “Ahmadiyya Community in Indonesia’s Contemporary Discourse: State’s Indecisive Protection to the Freedom of Religion and Belief.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 3(6):1442. doi: 10.46799/ijssr.v3i6.406.

Rey, Terry. 2014. Bourdieu on Religion: Imposing Faith and Legitimacy. Routledge.

Soedirgo, Jessica. 2018. “Informal Networks and Religious Intolerance: How Clientelism Incentivizes the Discrimination of the Ahmadiyah in Indonesia.” Citizenship Studies 22(2):191–207. doi:10.1080/13621025.2018.1445490.

Tempo. 2024. “Jemaat Ahmadiyah Batal Gelar Jalsah Salanah, Kemenag Sebut Permintaan Pemda Kuningan.” (https://www.tempo.co/politik/jemaat-ahmadiyah-batal-gelar-jalsah-salanah-kemenag-sebut-permintaan-pemda-kuningan-1178414).

Tirto. 2021. “Pembunuhan Terhadap Jemaat Ahmadiyah Di Cikeusik.” (https://tirto.id/pembunuhan-terhadap-jemaat-ahmadiyah-di-cikeusik-f923).