Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif

Sacred Speech, Social Authority, and Coastal Conservation: Manahelo Oral Traditions in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Authors

Downloads

Article Galley

DOI https://doi.org/10.14421/zqcdnt04
Page: 24-51
27 views
14 PDF Downloads

How to Cite

Sacred Speech, Social Authority, and Coastal Conservation: Manahelo Oral Traditions in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. (2026). Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 21(1), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.14421/zqcdnt04

Abstract

Coastal conservation approaches that rely predominantly on formal regulations often overlook the role of oral traditions and customary authority in fostering collective compliance with environmental protection. This study examines how Manahelo poetic speech constructs socio-religious authority and how myths and customary prohibitions (pamali) shape collective compliance with community-based coastal conservation practices in Rote Ndao, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative linguistic ethnographic approach, the research was conducted in two coastal customary territories, Dengka and Ba’a, Rote Ndao Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. Data were collected through audiovisual recordings of 6 (six) customary speech performances, in-depth interviews with 12 informants, participant observation, and document analysis. The data were examined using initial coding, axial coding, and ecocritical thematic analysis. The findings reveal that Manahelo oral traditions function as socio-religious institutions that legitimize customary authority, cultivate moral obligations, and regulate ecological behavior. Beliefs in supernatural guardians, particularly Oematan Nitu and Tasi Nitu, reinforce customary prohibitions (pamali) and territorial restrictions (fai punu) through perceived supernatural sanctions (mula). Although collective compliance is continually negotiated in response to everyday economic pressures, Manahelo's sacred authority remains an important source of legitimacy for environmental regulation beyond formal law enforcement mechanisms. The implications of this study extend sociological understandings of religious authority, cultural legitimacy, and social control in environmental governance, while highlighting the importance of recognizing customary institutions in developing inclusive, participatory, and sustainable conservation policies.

Pendekatan konservasi pesisir yang bertumpu pada regulasi formal sering kali mengabaikan peran tradisi lisan dan otoritas adat dalam membentuk kepatuhan masyarakat terhadap perlindungan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana tuturan puitis Manahelo membangun otoritas sosial-keagamaan serta bagaimana mitos dan larangan adat (pamali) membentuk kepatuhan kolektif dalam praktik konservasi pesisir berbasis masyarakat di Rote Ndao. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan etnografi linguistik di dua wilayah adat pesisir, yaitu Dengka dan Baa, Kabupaten Rote Ndao, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan melalui perekaman audiovisual terhadap 6 (enam) pertunjukan tuturan adat, wawancara mendalam dengan 12 informan, observasi partisipatif, dan studi dokumen. Data dianalisis melalui pengodean awal, pengodean aksial, dan analisis tematik ekokritis. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa tradisi lisan Manahelo berfungsi sebagai institusi sosial-keagamaan yang membangun legitimasi otoritas adat, menanamkan kewajiban moral, dan mengatur perilaku ekologis masyarakat. Kepercayaan terhadap entitas penjaga alam, seperti Oematan Nitu dan Tasi Nitu, memperkuat larangan adat (pamali) dan pembatasan wilayah (fai punu) melalui keyakinan terhadap sanksi supernatural (mula). Meskipun kepatuhan masyarakat terus dinegosiasikan dengan kepentingan ekonomi sehari-hari, otoritas sakral Manahelo tetap menjadi sumber legitimasi pengaturan lingkungan di luar mekanisme penegakan hukum formal. Implikasi penelitian ini memperluas pemahaman sosiologis tentang peran otoritas keagamaan, legitimasi budaya, dan pengendalian sosial dalam tata kelola lingkungan, sekaligus menunjukkan pentingnya pengakuan terhadap institusi adat dalam pengembangan kebijakan konservasi yang inklusif, partisipatif, dan berkelanjutan.

Keywords:

Oral Tradition, Poetic Parallelism, Religious Authority, Negotiated Compliance

Author Biography:

  • M. Furqan

    M. Furqan, S.Pd., M.Si. adalah dosen tetap pada Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Sosial dan Humaniora, Universitas Nusa Lontar Rote. Beliau menyelesaikan pendidikan Sarjana (S1) pada bidang Pendidikan Sejarah dan Magister (S2) pada bidang Kajian Budaya. Fokus utama penelitian dan keahlian akademisnya meliputi Kajian Budaya. Saat ini beliau menjabat sebagai Asisten Ahli dan sedang dalam proses pengusulan jabatan fungsional Lektor.

References:

Achmadi, Hablana Rizka, Adelia Ramadhani Savitri, Adhe Puspawari Hardhany, Ayu Rini Tirtasari Haryono, and Muh. Danny Wirawan. 2019. “Illegal Hunting Prevention by Indigenous People in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 10(1):65–73. https://jurnal.hukumonline.com/a/5d5ae02ebba6e22d0eac0f84/illegal-hunting-prevention-by-indigenous-people-in-bromo-tengger-semeru-national-park/. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v10i1.a13561.

Ade, Filza Yulina, Luchman Hakim, Estri Laras Arumingtyas, and Rodiyati Azrianingsih. 2019. “Habitat Anaphalis spp. in Tourism Area in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, East Java.” Jurnal Pembangunan dan Alam Lestari 10(2):137–141. https://jpal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jpal/article/view/429. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpal.2019.010.02.09.

Batoro, Jati, Serafinah Indriyani, and Bagyo Yanuwiadi. 2017. “Ethno-Ecology of Komplangan Field of the Bromo, Tengger, and Semeru Area in East Java: A Qualitative Approach.” Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education 9(1):41–48. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/biosaintifika/article/view/9193/0. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i1.9193.

Becker, C. Dustin, and Kabita Ghimire. 2003. “Synergy Between Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Conservation Science Supports Forest Preservation in Ecuador.” Conservation Ecology 8(1):1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00582-080101.

Berkes, Fikret, Johan Colding, and Carl Folke. 2000. “Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management.” Ecological Applications 10(5):1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.

Bernard, H. Russell. 2018. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 6th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. https://books.google.com/books/about/Research_Methods_in_Anthropology.html?id=M7PrswEACAAJ.

Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, and Fariborz Zelli. 2009. “The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis.” Global Environmental Politics 9(4):14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.

Bowen, Glenn A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9(2):27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.

Bowen, John R. 1986. “On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia.” The Journal of Asian Studies 45(3):545–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2056530.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Brosius, J. Peter. 1999. “Analyses and Interventions: Anthropological Engagements with Environmentalism.” Current Anthropology 40(3):277–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/200019.

Cinner, Joshua E., and Shankar Aswani. 2007. “Integrating Customary Management into Marine Conservation.” Biological Conservation 140(1–2):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.008.

Colding, Johan, and Carl Folke. 2001. “Social Taboos: ‘Invisible’ Systems of Local Resource Management and Biological Conservation.” Ecological Applications 11(2):584–600. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0584:STISOL]2.0.CO;2.

Dawson, Neil M., Brendan Coolsaet, Aditi Bhardwaj, David Brown, Bosco Lliso, Jacqueline Loos, Laura Mannocci, et al. 2024. “Reviewing the Science on 50 Years of Conservation: Knowledge Production Biases and Lessons for Practice.” Ambio 53(10):1395–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w.

Denzin, Norman K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Research_Act.html?id=gfS1AAAAIAAJ.

Dove, Michael R. 1986. “The Practical Reason of Weeds in Indonesia: Peasant vs. State Views of Imperata and Chromolaena.” Human Ecology 14(2):163–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889237.

Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo12182616.html.

Folke, Carl. 2004. “Traditional Knowledge in Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 9(3):7. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7/.

Gadgil, Madhav, Fikret Berkes, and Carl Folke. 1993. “Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation.” Ambio 22(2–3):151–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314060.

Garnett, Stephen T., Neil D. Burgess, John E. Fa, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Zsolt Molnár, Cathy J. Robinson, James E. M. Watson, et al. 2018. “A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation.” Nature Sustainability 1(7):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.

Geels, Frank W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case Study.” Research Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.

Hefner, Robert W. 1985. Hindu Javanese: Tengger Tradition and Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18zhf5s.

Hernawan, H., et al. 2021. “Analysis of Type Insect in Javanese Edelweiss (Anaphalis javanica) at Tegal Bungbrun Papandayan Mountain.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1098(6):062063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/6/062063.

Hidayat, Syifa Sakinah. 2019. “Kedudukan, Peran, dan Fungsi Dukun Pandita di Suku Tengger.” Umbara: Indonesian Journal of Anthropology 4(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v4i1.20543.

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673.

Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389781.

Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842.

Nadasdy, Paul. 1999. “The Politics of TEK: Power and the ‘Integration’ of Knowledge.” Arctic Anthropology 36(1–2):1–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40316502.

Naughton-Treves, Lisa, Margaret Buck Holland, and Katrina Brandon. 2005. “The Role of Protected Areas in Conserving Biodiversity and Sustaining Local Livelihoods.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:219–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.164507.

Oldekop, J. A., G. Holmes, W. E. Harris, and K. L. Evans. 2016. “A Global Assessment of the Social and Conservation Outcomes of Protected Areas.” Conservation Biology 30(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568.

Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science 325(5939):419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.

Patton, Michael Quinn. 1999. “Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis.” Health Services Research 34(5 Pt. 2):1189–1208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089059/.

Persoon, Gerard A. 1998. “Isolated Groups or Indigenous Peoples: Indonesia and the International Discourse.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 154(2):281–304. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003899.

Pilgrim, Sarah, Jules Pretty, Bill Adams, Fikret Berkes, Simone Ferreira de Athayde, Nigel Dudley, Eugene Hunn, et al. 2009. “The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration.” Conservation and Society 7(2):100–112. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.58642.

Putri, Febriana Kinanthi, Helena Joan Noven, Marhcelina Nurcahyati, Irfan A. N., Anisa Septiasari, Jati Batoro, and Ahmad Dwi Setyawan. 2022. “Review: Local Wisdom of the Tengger Tribe, East Java, Indonesia in Environmental Conservation.” Asian Journal of Ethnobiology 5(1):20–34. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjethnobiol/y050103.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Coding_Manual_for_Qualitative_Resear.html?id=bCf7zgEACAAJ.

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Decolonizing-methodologies-%3A-research-and-indigenous-peoples/oclc/809167003.

Souther, Sarah, Brian J. McGill, and Daniel Gallant. 2023. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Monitoring Biodiversity Change: A Framework for Integration.” Ecology and Society 28(1):15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13910-280115.

Sukmawan, Sony, and Nurul Alifah. 2024. “Harmonisasi Manusia dengan Alam dan Ekologi: Kajian atas Budaya Tamping di Masyarakat Tengger.” Jurnal Kawistara 14(2):186–197. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.89093.

Susanto, Denni, Prasetyo Nugroho, and Shinya Numata. 2024. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge for Monitoring Anaphalis javanica (DC.) Sch.Bip. (Asteraceae) in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, Indonesia.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 196(8):717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12869-8.

Techera, Erika J. 2010. “Customary Law and Community-Based Fisheries Management across the South Pacific Region.” Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association 2(1–2):279–292. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/customary-law-and-community-based-fisheries-management-across-the/.

Tengö, Maria, Eduardo S. Brondizio, Thomas Elmqvist, Pernilla Malmer, and Marja Spierenburg. 2014. “Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach.” Ambio 43(5):579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3.

Verschuuren, Bas, Robert Wild, Jeffrey McNeely, and Gonzalo Oviedo, eds. 2010. Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776639.

Wahyudi, Didik. 2010. “Distribusi dan Kerapatan Edelweis (Anaphalis javanica) di Gunung Batok Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru.” El-Hayah: Jurnal Biologi 1(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/elha.v1i2.1694.

Wibowo, Joshi Maharani, Sri Muljaningsih, and Dias Satria. 2021. “Daya Saing Ekowisata Berkelanjutan Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru.” Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan 18(1):45–62. https://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JPSEK/article/view/5808. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.1.45-62.

Wilson, Shawn. 2008. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing. https://fernwoodpublishing.ca/books/research-is-ceremony-shawn-wilson.

Yin, Robert K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/yin6e.

Yunas, Novy Setia, Amin Heri Susanto, Mukari, Endah Wahyuningsih, and Khudrotun Nafisah. 2024. “Integration of Ecology and Culture in Encouraging Village Government Innovation in the Bromo-Tengger-Semeru Area.” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science 13(1):402–409. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i1.3148.