Otoritas Keagamaan di Era Media Baru
Dakwah Gusmus di Media Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.v5i2.2636Keywords:
Gus Mus; Authority; Traditional Religious Sources; Moderate; Social Media.Abstract
This article examines religious authority and new media, with a case study on Gus Mus' da'wah model. The research question of this research is how the authority of religious sources changes from the analog to digital era; how is the map of the authority of traditional religious sources in the era of disruption; and how is the strategies of traditional religious source authorities in the era of new media. To answer this question, this study combines ethnographic and netnographic data. Ethnographic data was carried out through interviews and following Gus Mus' da'wah activities on several social media. Meanwhile, netnographic data was carried out by searching online data and observing online participants. The results of this study indicate that the presence of social media as a form of new da'wah model does not shift traditional religious authority, but instead strengthen this authority. Thanks to the social media. Traditional Islam would always become the authoritative source of public religious understanding. Therefore, new religious authorities or known as charismatic dai also come from the circle of dais who have a formal Islamic education background or pesantren which comprehend the pesantren classical books and other Islamic religious sciences. Gus Mus, who was originally a traditional religious authority, massively disseminated his da'wah to online spaces, especially Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Podcasts, and WhatsApp. Therefore, Gus Mus' authority as a preacher persisted and even strengthened, thanks to the charismatic clerical culture that was obtained from the new media. Finally, thanks to the combination of traditional culture and the role of new media, Gus Mus' charisma is distinguishing and different from other new religious authorities. Thanks to the support of his media team, his religious universal message can be more widely spread in every level of society.
[Artikel ini mengkaji tentang otoritas keagamaan dan media baru, dengan studi kasus pada model dakwah Gus Mus. Pertanyaan yang diajukan adalah bagaimana pergeseran otoritas sumber keagamaan dari era analog ke digital?; bagaimana peta otoritas sumber keagamaan tradisional di era disrupsi?; dan bagaimana strategi otoritas sumber keagamaan tradisional di era media baru? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penelitian ini mengkombinasikan data etnografi dan netnografi. Data etnografi dilakukan melalui wawancara dan mengikuti kegiatan dakwah Gus Mus di beberapa media sosial. Sedangkan data netnografi dilakukan melalui penelusuran data-data online dan observasi partisipan online. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kehadiran media sosial sebagai bentuk model dakwah baru tidak menggeser pengaruh otoritas keagamaan tradisional, tetapi justru semakin memperkuatnya. Berkat media sosial, Islam tradisional tetap menjadi sumber otoritatif pemahaman keagamaan mayoritas umat. Oleh karena itu, figur otoritas Islam tetap berasal dari lingkaran dai yang memiliki latar belakang pendidikan Islam formal ataupun pesantren yang menguasai kitab-kitab klasik (turath) pesantren dan menguasai ilmu-ilmu agama Islam lainnya. Sebagai figur otoritatif keagamaan tradisional, Gus Mus secara masif mendiseminasikan dakwahnya ke ruang online, utamanya Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Podcasts, maupun WhatsApp. Oleh karena itu, otoritas Gus Mus sebagai seorang dai tetap bertahan dan bahkan menguat berkat media baru. Berkat perpaduan antara kultur tradisional dan peran media baru, Gus Mus tampil sebagai figur karismatik otoritas Islam tradisional yang khas dan berbeda dari figur otoritas keagamaan baru lainnya. Berkat dukungan tim medianya, pesan universal dakwahnya dapat lebih luas tersebar ke setiap lapisan masyrakat.]
Downloads
References
Adair-Toteff, Christopher. 2005. “Max Weber’s Charisma”. Journal of Classical Sociology 5, no. 2.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. 1994. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Tentang Pandangan Hidup Kyai. Jakarta: LP3ES..
Eickelman, D. F., & Anderson, J. W. 2003. Redefining Muslim Publics. New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere.
Eickelman Dale F. dan Anderson, Jon W. 2007. New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003), 1–18; Bryan S. Turner, “Religious Authority and the New Media,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 24, No. 2
Fealy, G., & White, S. 2008. Expressing Islam: Religious life and politics in Indonesia. In Expressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia.
Han, Muhammad Ibtissam. 2018. “Ustadz Hits, Bahasa Gaul dan Social Media Effect,” dalam Sunarwoto (ed.), Islam Antara Teks, Kuasa dan Identitas. Yogyakarta: Arti Bumi Intaran.
Han, Muhamad Ibtissam. 2018. Anak Muda, Dakwah Jalanan dan Fragmentasi Otoritas Keagamaan: Studi atas Gerakan Dakwah Pemuda Hijrah dan Pemuda Hidayah. Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Haryadi. Didid 2020. Otoritas Keagamaan Baru: Habituasi dan Arena Dakwah Era Digital. Islamic Insights Journal. Vol. 2(2): PP 69-82.
Heryanto, A. 2014. Identity and pleasure: The politics of Indonesian screen culture. In Identity and Pleasure: The Politics of Indonesian Screen Culture. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj31-1k.
Hoesterey, James B. 2008. “Marketing Morality: The Rise, Fall and Rebranding of Aa Gym,” dalam Greg Fealy & Sally White, (eds.), Expressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Kailani, Najib 2015. Aspiring to Prosperity: The Economic Theology of Urban Muslims in Contemporary Indonesia. Canbera: School of Humanities and Social Sciences UNSW.
Kiptiyah, Siti Mariatul.2017. “Kyai Selebriti dan Media Baru,” Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Vol. 19, No. 3.
Spradley, James P. (1997). Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Turner, 2007. Religious Authority and the New Media. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Tempo.co. 2021. “Rumus Pendapatan Platform Dakwah Abdul Somad dan 3 Dai Lain,” (https://grafis.tempo.co/read/1312/rumus-pendapatan-platform-dakwah-abdul-somad-dan-3-dai-lain) Diakses pada 23 Februari 2021.
Watson, C.W. 2005. “A Popular Indonesian Preacher: The Significance of Aa Gymnastiar,”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 11, No. 4.
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Illinois: The Free Press.
Weng, Hew Wai. 2018. “The Art of Dakwah : Social Media, Visual Persuasion and the Islamist Propagation of Felix Siauw” Indonesia and the Malay World, Vol. 46, No. 134.
Zainuddin MZ. 1997. Dakwah dan Politik: Dai Berjuta Umat, cet.1 Bandung: Mizan.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. 2009. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002), 1-16; Muhammad Qasim Zaman, “The Ulama and Contestations on Religious Authority,” dalam Muhammad Khalid Masud, Armando Salvatore dan Martin van Bruinessen (eds.), Islam and Modernity: Key Issues and Debates. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. 2002. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam. United States: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Arnis Rachmadhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JURNAL PANANGKARAN disebarluaskan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerrivatives 4.0 International License.