Pemeringkatan Kinerja Dosen pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Menggunakan Algoritma Simple Additive Weighting

Authors

  • Elly Mufida Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Nandang Iriadi Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Doni Andriansyah Universitas Nusa Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2024.9.1.59-69

Keywords:

Algorithms, Simple Additive Weighting, SAW, Tri Dharma of Higher Education, Student Feedback

Abstract

The Tri Dharma of Higher Education is an obligation for lecturers while carrying out their duties as lecturers at higher education institutions, the implementation of which is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. The Tri Dharma of Higher Education is a lecturer's obligation, including Education and Teaching, Research and Development, and Community Service. Lecturers need Support and motivation to implement quality Tri Dharma, especially at "X" Private Universities. Providing rewards or awards can motivate lecturers to give their best performance to Tri Dharma. Student feedback is also needed as evaluation material for lecturers to measure their teaching abilities. Rewarding lecturers can be done by ranking lecturer performance, especially at private universities. The SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) algorithm ranks lecturer performance through the criteria of education and teaching, research, community service, and student feedback. An assessment of several subcriteria presents each criterion. The normalized scoring matrix is ​​the ranking preference. From the results of data processing on lecturer performance and feedback from students, with a sample of 25 lecturers, a ranking score was obtained on a scale of 0 to 1, where a score of 1 is the highest ranking. The lecturer performance ranking process involves lecturers, students, and the Study Program Management Unit. A lecturer performance rating information system is needed to facilitate all actors' involvement in the lecturer performance rating process and provide valid and timely rating results to stakeholders.

References

Apriani, N. D., Krisnawati, N., & Fitrisari, Y. (2021). Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode SAW Dalam Pemilihan Guru Terbaik. Journal Automation Computer Information System, 1(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.47134/jacis.v1i1.5

Ariani, S. S. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa dalam Pengimplementasian Tri Daharma Perguruan Tinggi. At-Tadbir : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.3454/AT-TADBIR.V3I1.3414

Azhari, D. S., & Alaren, A. (2017). Peran Dosen dalam Mengembangkan Karakter Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pelangi, 9(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2017.v9i2.1856

Gunawan, V. S., & Yunus, Y. (2021). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan dalam Optimalisasi Pemberian Insentif terhadap Pemasok Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v3i3.86

Jufri, H. Al. (2022). Perhitungan Manual Dengan Menggunakan Metoda SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, 2(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.46306/SM.V2I1.21

Ratama, N. (2020). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan dan Sistem Pakar dengan Pemahaman Studi Kasus. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia. http://uwaismall.com

Serelia, E. B., & Adin Saf, M. R. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Peminatan Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Pada SMA Negeri Dharma Pendidikan. Techno.Com, 19(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.33633/tc.v19i3.3498

Setiadi, A., Yunita, Y., & Ningsih, A. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.572

Simatupang, J. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SAW Studi Kasus AMIK Mahaputra Riau. Jurnal Intra Tech, 2(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.37030/jit.v2i1.27

Sukaryati, L. N., Voutama, A., Karawang, U. S., & Ronggo, J. H. (2022). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Memilih Karyawan Terbaik. Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, 24(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.33557/JURNALMATRIK.V24I3.2029

Hery Sunandar, & Denni M Rajagukguk. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Instruktur Bahasa Inggris Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). JUKI : Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 1(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.53842/juki.v1i2.18

Syam, S., & Rabidin, M. (2019). Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi (Studi Kasus : PT. Indomarco Prismatama cabang Tangerang 1). UNISTEK, 6(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.33592/unistek.v6i1.168

Wijaya, L. F. (2021). Sistem Reward dan Punishment Sebagai Pemicu dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. Journal MISSY (Management and Business Strategy), 2(2), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.24929/missy.v2i2.1681

Yulianti, E., & Z, R. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Bedah Rumah Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : Dinas Sosial Dan Tenaga Kerja Kota Padang). JURNAL TEKNOIF, 6(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.21063/JTIF.2018.V6.2.64-73

Yusuf, R., & Triyono, G. (2022). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW di PT Gracias Mitra Selaras. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Fakultas Teknologi Informasi (SENAFTI), 1(1), 2003–2010. https://senafti.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/senafti/article/view/369

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25

How to Cite

Mufida, E., Iriadi, N., & Andriansyah, D. (2024). Pemeringkatan Kinerja Dosen pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Menggunakan Algoritma Simple Additive Weighting. JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga), 9(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2024.9.1.59-69