Religious Rights and State Presence in John Locke's Liberalism Perspective (Reflections on the 1984 Tanjung Priok Case)

Authors

  • Orchida Nadia Salsabila UIN Sunan Kalijaga
  • Nilman Ghofur UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • M. Misbahul Mujib UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v12i1.2957

Keywords:

Religious Rights, State Presence, Tanjung Priok Case, John Locke's Liberalism.

Abstract

Upholding human rights as a part of international law without the presence of the state would seem impossible because the state is an essential element of international law. What is interesting is what happened in the 1984 Tanjung Priok Indonesia case, where human rights violations occurred because of the state's presence. The question is, how should the state's presence be? This study reflected on the 1984 Tanjung Priok case as a lesson on how countries should be involved in religious rights so as not to injure human rights. Answering that question, this study used a normative approach and John Locke's theory of liberalism. Furthermore, this study found that during the New Order era, the state's presence in civil rights was too deep, especially those related to religious rights. The presence of the state is indeed important, but the presence of the state, which is very dominant for reasons of political stability by depriving people of the right to practice their religion, cannot be justified. In addition, it is also unacceptable if the state reduces civil rights because of religious considerations. Although it is difficult, if the state has a certain ideology or religion, the state should not harm individual rights, including the rights of other religions and the religious rights of its citizens that are different. The state must not interfere too deeply or get too involved in its own ideology/religion, which then prohibits the religious rights of adherents of other religions who are its citizens.

References

Abdul Aziz Thaba, Islam Dan Negara Dalam Politik Orde Baru (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996).

Ady Thea DA, Various Human Rights Events Throughout 2022, https ://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/a/beragam-events-ham-sepanjang-2022-lt63a94f1fb51c4/?page=all

Alfensius Alwino, "Discourse on Social Justice: Study of Theory of Justice in Locke's Liberalism, Marx's Equation, and Rawls' Justice as Fairness," Lintas 32, no. 3 (2017): 309, https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v32i3.2696.309-328.

Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984).

Andi Suwirta, (2017) “Pers dan Kritik Sosial Pada Masa Orde Baru: Kasus Peristiwa Tanjung Priok Tahun 1984 dalam Pandangan Surat Kabar Merdeka dan Kompas di Jakarta,” Insancita: Jurnal of Islamic Studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia, 2, 2: 101-122,https://journals.mindamas.com/index.php/insancita/article/view/937.

Arifin, Ridwan, and Lilis Eka Lestari. “Penegakan Dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Dalam Konteks Implementasi Sila Kemanusiaan Yang Adil Dan Beradab.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 5, no. 2 (2019): 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.16497"

Besar, (2011) “Pelaksanaan dan Penegakkan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Demokrasi di Indonesia,” Humaniora 2, no. 1:p. 202.

Dua Belas Pelanggaran HAM Berat yang Diakui Presiden Jokowi, https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1678970/inilah-12-pelanggaran-ham-berat-yang-diakui-presiden-jokowi

Eamonn Butler, Classic Liberalism Eamonn Butler Brief Introduction (Jakarta Selatan: Friedrich Naumann Foundation Indonesia, 2019).

Firdiansyah, “Peran dan Harapan Korban untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat HAM Masa Lalu,” Jurnal HAM, 2016.

In 2022, Komnas HAM Received 5,306 Complaints guess Most human rights violations _ complained i.e. police, corporations, and government. https://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/a/tahun-2022--komnas-ham-untung-5306-pengdinding-dugaan-pelanggaran-ham-lt6395faf39959c/.

Joebaar Ajoeb, Islam Diadili: Mengungkap Tragedi Tanjung Priok, 1 st Ed. (Jakarta: The World Bank, 2002).

Lexi J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung: Rosda Karya, 1991).

M. Syafi'ie, Human Rights Violations and Message For stake Policy , https://law.uii.ac.id/blog/2019/01/21/pelanggaran-ham-dan-pesan-untuk-pemangku-kebijakan/

Martinus Danang, “Peristiwa Tanjung Priok 1984: Latar Belakang, Tragedi Kerusuhan, dan Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM,” KOMPASPEDIA, 2021.

Matahatipemuda, Tragedi Tanjung Priok Pembantaian Aparat Terhadap Orang Islam (Indonesia, 2021).

Misbahul Mujib, M., Mustari Kurniawati Muchlas, (2023), Achievements and Challenges of Human Rights Protection Policy in Realizing Good Governance in Indonesia and China, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System (JHCLS) 3 (2), 328-360 https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.98

Rhona K.M. Smith and Dkk, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia (Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia (PUSHAM UII), 2008).

Rizal Al Hamid, “Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Wajib Umum Pancasila Untuk Perguruan Tinggi,” 2022.

Rusman Widodo, (2014) “Jurnal HAM; Komisi Nasional Hak.Asasi Manusia,” HAM 11: p. 5–6.

Sabit Irfani, Ricky Santoso Muharam, and Sunarso Sunarso, (2022) “Keadilan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Aksi Kamisan di Indonesia,” Jurnal HAM 13, no. 1: 82–83, https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.81-96.

Taher, “Tragedi Tanjung Priok,” Ived Tangerang, 2022.

Tohir Bawazir, Jalan Tengah Demokrasi : Antara Fundamentalisme Dan Sekularisme, ed. Artawijaya Dhurorudin Mashad (Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2015).

U. Batubara, R. Siregar, and N. Siregar, (2021) “Liberalisme John Locke dan Pengaruhnya dalam Tatanan Kehidupan”, Jurnal Education and Development, 9, 4: pp. 485-491, https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/3189.

Why Tanjung Priok Not Included in 12 Acknowledged Serious Human Rights Violations Jokowi ? https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/why-tanjung-priok-tak-enter-12-pelanggaran-ham-berat-yang-diakui-jokowi-1zce8ALwa9V/3

Wibowo W, and Setyadi Y. (2021) “Penegakan Hukum Ham Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Dalam Kasus Pelanggaran Ham Berat: Studi Kasus Tanjung Priok, Timor Timor, Dan Abepura.” Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 5, 1: 108–119 https://dx.doi.org/10.18592/jils.v5i2.5793.

Zulfan, (2018) “Pemikiran Politik Thomas Hobbes, John Locke Dan J.J. Rousseau Tentang Perjanjian Sosial,” Serambi Akademica, 6, no. 2: 30-34 https://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/serambi-akademika/article/view/800.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-26

How to Cite

Salsabila, O. N., Ghofur, N., & Mujib, M. M. (2023). Religious Rights and State Presence in John Locke’s Liberalism Perspective (Reflections on the 1984 Tanjung Priok Case). Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 12(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v12i1.2957