Research articles submitted to this journal will undergo a double-blind peer-review process. All research articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts. Reviewers provide valuable scholarly comments to improve the content of the manuscript.

Double-Blind Peer Review
In the review process, the authors and reviewers do not know each other.
Policy of Reviewers:

1. To provide comments and corrections in the manuscript
2. To make a summary of the complete assessment sheet
3. To provide clear suggestion or advice to the editor
4. If the reviewer recommend "accepted" by the revision, describe clearly how the revisions should be made
5. If the reviewer recommend "reject" it must provide an alternative journals or suggestion, so the prospect of "resubmission" or "submission" elsewhere will become possible

Several Parameters for Evaluating Manuscript:

1. Are the data and information on the manuscript is a new and original?
2. Does the manuscript can contribute significant to advancing science?
3. Is a similar material has been published elsewhere?
4. Is the substance of the manuscript more suitable in other journals?
5. Does the reference current or up to date and completely mention on the manuscript?
6. Methods part on the manuscript is align with the aim of research?
7. The author presents the manuscript clearly and easy to be read?
8. Are there any errors of fact and calculations?
9. Are tables on the manuscript present data clearly and concisely?
10. Are all necessary illustrations needed on the manuscript?
11. Is the abstract written in concisely?
12. Is the title of the manuscript can represent the content of manuscript?
13. Is the grammar and spelling on the manuscript meet the standards?