The Government's Role in the Dissolution of PKI: A Legal and Human Rights Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v12i2.3179Keywords:
Law and Human Rights, The Government's Role in the Dissolution of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI)Abstract
The Dissolution of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) has been a matter of concern due to the restriction of the right to associate. On the other hand, the strict prohibition of the PKI's existence is intended to protect individual rights. The communist ideology emerged from the West as a response to the oppression of the bourgeoisie against the proletariat, aiming to establish an authoritarian state while prioritizing welfare. The teachings of the PKI are in conflict with Pancasila as the state philosophy and legislation due to differing state backgrounds. Therefore, it is not appropriate to implement them within the government system, as it poses a threat if the PKI's efforts to seize power were successful. So, what is the government's role in the dissolution of the PKI with a legal and human rights approach? This study employs a normative juridical research method. The research results indicate that the government issued regulations through the MPRS Decree to dissolve the PKI and prohibit the propagation of Marxist-Leninist ideologies in Indonesia. In this context, the government, as a duty bearer, has three obligations. First, to respect means that the PKI and Marxist-Leninist ideologies are strongly prohibited in Indonesia as a sign of the state's respect for the rights of the majority of the population. Second, to protect means that the state guarantees the rights of its citizens by banning the dissemination of communist ideologies, which pose a threat to the citizens' rights as communism does not recognize individual rights. Third, to fulfill means that the MPRS Decree banning the PKI and communist ideologies aims to make the state more democratic by not limiting or reducing citizens' rights, thus ensuring the fulfillment of citizens' rights in a democratic society
References
Arifin, M. T. Muhammdiyah Potret Yang Berubah, (Surakarta: Institut Gelanggang Pemikiran Filsafat Sosial dan Budaya Kependidikan, 1990).
Asplund, Knut D. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, (Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2009).
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara Darurat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007).
Auli, Renata Christha. “Hak Asasi Manusia: Pengertian, Sejarah, dan Prinsipnya”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hak-asasi-manusia-pengertian-sejarah-dan-prinsipnya-lt62d8fb697c622/, akses 28 Mei 2023.
Batubara, Nami Irawan. "Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kegagalan Gerakan Pemberontakan Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) 1926-1927." Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 14.1 (2022): 1-16.
Bawamenewi, Adrianus. “Impelementasi Hak Politik Warga Negara”, Jurnal Warta, Vol. 13, No. 3. (2019).
Borchert, Donald M. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Michigan: Thomson Gale & Mamillan Refernce, 2006).
Brackman, Arnold C. Indonesian Communism: A History, (New York: Frederick Preager, 1964).
Engels, Frederick. Little Library No. 3 Principles of Communism: Engels First Draft of The Communist Manifesto, Terjemahan, Introduction dan Appendix oleh Max Bedacht, (Chicago: The Daily Worker Publishing Co., 1925).
Faith, Herbeth. dan Lance Castles, Pemikiran Politik Indonesia 1945-1965, (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1988).
Gustom, Binsar. Pelanggaran HAM Dalam Hukum Keadaan Darurat Di Indonesia Mengapa Peradilan HAM Ad Hoc Indonesia Kurang Efektif, (Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010).
Hadiningrat, Kusumah. Sejarah Operasi-Operasi Gabungan Dalam Rangka Dwikora, (Jakarta: De. Hankam, 1971).
Hatta, Mohammad. Pengantar ke Jalan Ekonomi Sosiologis, (Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung, 2002).
Holmes, Leslie. Communism: A Very Short Introduction, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Hufron, Hufron, and Hajjatulloh Hajjatulloh. "Aktualisasi Negara Hukum Pancasila Dalam Memberantas Komunisme Di Indonesia." Mimbar Keadilan 13.1 (2020): 60-71.
Ilham dan NRA, ”Arief Hidayat: Pembatasan HAM Tidak Boleh Diskriminatif”, https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16041, akses 5 Juni 2023.
Kattopo, Aristides. Meyingkap Kabut Halim 1965, (Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1999).
Kupper, Adam dan Jessica Kupper. The Social Science Encyclopedia, Vol. 1, (New York: Routledge, 2004).
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich. The State and Revolution, (Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1973).
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich. What is to be Done? (Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1973).
Lerclerc, Jacques. “Aidit dan Partai Pada Tahun 1950”, Prisma, No. 7, (1982).
Lerissa, R. Z. Jenderal Maraden Panggabean Berjuang dan Mengabdi, (Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1993).
Mandan, Arief Mudatsir. “Subchan Z.E. dalam Konstelasi Politik Pasca 1965”, Prisma No. Khusus, (1991).
Marwandianto dan Helmi Ardani Nasution, “Hak atas Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 dan 310 KUHP”, Jurnal HAM, Vol. 11, No. 1, (2020).
Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co, 1904), hlm. 372.
Matompo, Osgar S, “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Keadaan Darurat”, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 21, No. 1, (2014).
Melina, Cairin. ”Kebebasan Bereskpresi di Era Demokrasi: Catatan Penegakkan Hak Asasi Manusia”, Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, (2018).
Morris, William. The New International Webster’s Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Laguage, (Florida: Trident Press International, 1996), hlm. 265.
Nihal, Jayawicakrama. he Judicial Application of Human Rights Law National, Regional and International Jurisprudence, (Jakarta: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Notosusanto, Nugroho. dan Ismail Saleh, Tragedi Nasional Percobaan Kup G 30 S/PKI di Indonesia, Cet. II, (Jakarta: Intermassa, 1990).
Permata, Harsa. “Gerakan 30 September dalam Perspektif Filsafat Sejarah Marxisme” Jurnal Filsafat, Vol. 25, No. 2, (2015).
Prasetiyo, Angga Angga. "Dinamika Konflik Antara Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia dan Partai Komunis Indonesia." ISTORIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sejarah 16.1 (2020).
Puspitasari, Regita. Dinie Anggraeni Dewi, dan Yayang Furi Furnamasari, “Hak Asasi Untuk Kebebasan Beragama”, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol. 5, No. 3, (2021).
Rahmawati, Fadhilah. “Kritik Terhadap Konsep Ideologi Komunisme Karl Marx”, Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2020).
Robertson, H. dan J.G. Merrills, Human Rights in Europe A Study of The European Convention on Human Rights, (Manchester dan New York: Manchester University Press, 1994).
Roeder, O. G. The Smiling General: President Soeharto of Indonesia, (Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1969).
Soetanto, Himawan. Madiun Dari Republik ke Republik, (Jakarta: KATA, 2008).
Subhan, M. "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penganut Ideologi Komunisme/Marxisme-Leninisme Di Indonesia." Mimbar Keadilan 12.2 (2019): 138-154.
Suseno, Franz Magnis. Pemikiran Karl Marx: Dari Sosialisme Utopis ke Perselisihan Revisionisme, (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2013).
Syukur, Abdul. "Kehancuran golongan komunis di indonesia." Jurnal Sejarah Lontar 5.2 (2008): 1-8.
Wood, John S, 100 Things Should You Know About Communism and Religion, (Washington D. C.: Committee on Un-American Activities, U. S. House of Representatives, 1949).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Tanggungjawab Penerbit (Publisher):
- Jurnal IN RIGHT sebagai penerbit jurnal ilmiah bertanggungjawab menerbitkan artikel yang setelah melalui proses editing, peer-review, layout sesuai dengan aturan penerbitan Jurnal Ilmiah.
- Jurnal IN RIGHT bertanggungjawab menjamin kebebasan akademik bagi para editor dan reviewer dalam menjalankan tugasnya masing-masing.
- Jurnal IN RIGHT bertanggungjawab menjaga privasi dan melindungi kekayaan intelektual dan hak cipta, dan kebebasan editorial.
