VALIDITAS TAFSÎR BI AL-‘ILMÎ DALAM PENAFSIRAN AYAT-AYAT PENCIPTAAN ALAM

Authors

  • Theo Jaka Prakoso UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-04

Keywords:

Validity of Tafsir bi al-‘ilmi, Creation of Nature

Abstract

Progress of knowledge provides a major influence on the development of other knowledge, including in the field of Quranic interpretation. The achievements of modern science provide a new color in the method of interpreting the Qur'an. The tendency of interpreters using the progress of science gave birth to the method of tafsir bi al-‘Ilm (scientific interpretation). As a new method, tafsir bi al-‘Ilmi becomes one of the methods which is validated. Although some people use this method as a proof of Qur'anic miracles, this study aims to find out the validity of the truth of tafsir bi al-'Ilmi by using the theory of truth in the philosophy of science. This study uses a text analysis method to provide an understanding of the views that use the method of tafsir bi al-'Ilmi as a way to understand the Quran. This study found that the use of scientific discoveries as an approach to prove that the Qur'an contains explanations for natural phenomena is carried out by some modern interpreters, such as Tantawi Jawhari, Sayyid Qutb and M. Quraish Shihab. They assume that al-Dhariyat (51): 47, al-Anbiya (21): 30, Fussilat (41): 11, Hud (11): 7 and al-Haj (22): 47 explain the creation of nature in accordance with the discoveries of modern science. However, in this study, the interpretation of these verses by using the theory of correspondence, the theory of coherence, and consensus theory were not found to be true. Therefore, this study supports the opinions of al-Shatibi, al-Dhahabi, and Muhammad Shaltut, who rejected the validity of tafsir bi al-'Ilmi.

Abstract viewed: 991 times | PDF downloaded = 1605 times

References

Aḥmad, Yûsuf al-Ḥâj. Mawsu’ah Al-I’jâz Al-’Ilmî Fî Al-Qur’an Al-Karîm Wa Al-Sunnah Al-Muṭahharah. Damaskus: Dâr Ibn Ḥajar, 2003.

Aḥmad, Hanafi. Al-Tafsîr Al-Ilmî Li Ayat Al-Kawniyah Fî Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dâr al-Ma’arif, n.d.

Al-Dhahabî, Muḥammad Husayn. Al-Tafsîr Wa Al-Mufassirûn. Vol. 2. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2007.

Al-Ghazâli, Abû ḥâmid Muḥamamad bin Muḥammad. Jawâhir Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1986.

Al-Kawâkibî, Abd al-Rahmân. Tabâi’ Al-Istibdâd Wa Maṣâri’ Al-Isti’bâd. Beirut: Muassasah al-Arabiyah li Dirâsah wa al-Nashr, 2009.

Al-Muhtasib, Abd al-Majîd Abd al-Salâm. Ittihât Al-Tafsîr Fî Al-’Aṣr Al-Hadîth. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1973.

Al-Najjâr, Zaghlul Raghîb. Al-Tasîr Al-Ayah Al-Kawniyah Fi Al-Qur’an Al-Karîm. Vol. 4. Beirut: Maktabah al-Tharwah al-Dawliyah, 2001.

Al-Qarâḍawi, Yusûf. Kayfa Nata’amal Ma’a Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dâr al-Shurûq, 2000.

Al-Râzî, Fakr al-Dîn. Mafâtiḥ Al-Ghayb. Vol. 5. Bairut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1981.

Al-Rumî, Fahd bin Abd al-Raḥman Sulaymân. Al-Madrasah Al-’Aqliyah Al-Hadîthah Al-Tafsîr. Riyâḍ: Riyasah al-Buhûth al-Ilmiyah wa al-Ifta’, 1983.

Al-Shaṭibî, Abû Isḥâq. Al-Muwâfaqat Fî Uṣûl Al-Shari’ah. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, n.d.

Al-Suyûṭî, Jalâl al-Dîn. Al-Itqân Fi ’Ulûm Al-Qur’an. Vol. 4. Beirut: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyah al-’Ammah li al-Kitâb, 1974.

Al-Sya’rawi, Mutawalli. Tafsir Al-Fatihah. Translated by TGK Asman Ismail. Jakarta: Madani Press, 1990.

Al-ṭabarî, Muḥammad bin Jarîr. Jâmi’ Al-Bayân Fî Ta’wîl Al-Qur’an. Vol. 9. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risâlah, 2000.

Al-Zarqânî, Muḥammad ’Abd al-’Aẓîm. Manâhil Al-’Irfân. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1988.

Bakhtiar, Amsal. Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2012.

Broad, C. D. “Francis Bacon and Scientific Method.” Nature, 1926. https://doi.org/10.1038/118523a0.

Bucaille, Maurice. Bible, Qur’an Dan Sains Modern. Translated by M. Zaenal Arifin. Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang, 2001.

Craig, Edwin. Routladge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 9. London: Routledge, 1998.

Fakhry, Majid. A History of Islamic Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

Ghozali, Mahbub. “Hermeneutika Sufistik Al-Ghazali Dalam Mishkat Al-Anwar.” MUTAWATIR 5, no. 1 (September 10, 2015): 50. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2015.5.1.50-73.

Hawking, Stephen. Teori Segala Sesuatu. Translated by Ikhlasul Ardi Nugroho. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.

Ibn Manẓûr, Muḥammad bin Mukrim. Lisân Al-’Arab. Vol. 10. Bairut: Dâr Ṣâdir, 1414.

Iryani, Eva. “AL-QUR’AN DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 17, no. 3 (October 27, 2017): 66–83. https://doi.org/10.33087/JIUBJ.V17I3.403.

Jawharî, Ṭantawî. Al-Jawâhir Fî Tafsîr Al-Qur’an Al-Karîm. Vol. 19. Mesir: Muṣṭafâ al-Bâb al-ḥalabî, 1249.

Juoro, Umar. Kebenaran Al-Qur’an Dalam Sains Pesandingan Wahyu Dan Teori Fisika Tentang Alam Semesta. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Cidesindo, 2011.

Laila, Izzatul. “PENAFSIRAN AL-QUR’AN BERBASIS ILMU PENGETAHUAN.” Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman 9, no. 1 (June 10, 2014). https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2014.9.1.45-66.

McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. “Exegetical Sciences.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Qur’an, edited by Andrew Rippin. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

Muslih, Mohammad. “Al-Qur’an Dan Lahirnya Sains Teistik.” TSAQAFAH 12, no. 2 (November 30, 2016). https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v12i2.756.

Olscamp, Paul J. The Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Belanda: The Hague, 1970.

Permono, Ajar. “KRITIK METODOLOGI PENAFSIRAN BUCAILLISME ATAS AYAT-AYAT SAINS.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (October 12, 2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-01.

Punch, Keith, and Tom A. O’Donoghue. Qualittative Educational Research in Action: Doing and Reflecting. London: Routledge Falmer, 2003.

Quṭb, Sayyid. Fî Ẓilâl Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dâr al-Shurûq, 1972.

Rahman, Fazlur. Al-Qur’an Sumber Ilmu Pengetahuan. Translated by M. Arifin. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1989.

———. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

Romlah, Siti. “Sains Dan Teknologi Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Studi Islam: Pancawahana 11, no. 2 (2016). http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/tapalkuda/index.php/pwahana/article/view/2700.

Runes, Dagobert D. Dictionary of Philosophy, 1963.

Saleh, Sujiat Zubaidi. “Epistimologi Penafsiran Ilmiah Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal TSAQAFAH 7, no. 1 (2011).

Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. Sains Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.

Shalṭûṭ, Maḥmûd. Tafsîr Al-Qur’an Al-Karîn Al-Ajzâ’ Al-Ashrah Al-’Ula. Beirut: Dâr al-Shurûq, 1974.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Mukjizat Al-Qur’an Ditinjau Dari Aspek Kebahasaan, Isyarat Ilmiah Dan Pemberitaan Ghaib. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 1997.

———. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Vol. 15. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2009.

———. Wawasan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Maudhu’i Atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 1996.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2000.

Ṭayyarah, Nadiah. Buku Pintar Sains Dalam Al-Qur’an: Mengerti Mukjizat Ilmiah Firman Allah. Translated by M. Zaenal Arifin. Jakarta: Zaman, 2014.

Yahya, Harun. The Qur’an Leads The Way to Science. Istanbul: Global Publishing, 2004.

Downloads

Published

30-01-2020

How to Cite

Prakoso, T. J. (2020). VALIDITAS TAFSÎR BI AL-‘ILMÎ DALAM PENAFSIRAN AYAT-AYAT PENCIPTAAN ALAM. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 21(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-04

Issue

Section

Articles