INTERPRETASI SUFISTIK ATAS HADIS MELALUI SASTRA DALAM SYAIR PERAHU KARYA HAMZAH FANSURI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-10

Keywords:

Understanding of Hadith, Sufism Scholars, Syair Perahu, Semiotics

Abstract

The understanding of hadith is so far still dominated by hadith scholars with various methodologies and approaches that have been standardized in conducting studies on the hadith. Understanding of hadith is not only performed by hadith scholars but also by Sufism scholars. One of the applications in understanding hadith by Sufism scholars is done through poetry media. One of the figures included in this category is Hamzah Fansuri that can be seen from his works, One of which is the "Syair Perahu" (the boat poem). Syair Perahu loads hadith contents such as faith, knowledge, preparing charity towards the afterlife, Barzakh eschatology, and tawhid values. Syair Perahu is full of signs used as symbols in conveying prophetic messages, such as boats, merchants, sea, islands, and so on. To find the content of the meaning contained in the Syair Perahu, the writer will apply Charles S. Peirce's semiotic theory. The results of this study found that literature, in this case Syair Perahu, became a medium to convey meaning understood by interpretant. This study also found the tendency of the Sufis represented by Hamzah Fansuri towards hadiths that have eschatological nuances. Hamzah Fansuri's understanding of the hadith in the Syair Perahu rejected the assumption of some people that his Sufism understanding deviated from correct understanding. Through the study of semiotics, Hamzah Fanzuri used the type of icon and index signs by using ligisign representamen, which indicated that he maintains the principles of meaning by paying attention to signs close to the intended meaning in the text of the hadith.

Abstract viewed: 1491 times | PDF downloaded = 1264 times

References

’Afîfî, Abû al-’A’la. “Muqaddimah.” In Fî Al-Taṣawwuf Al-Islâmî Wa Tarikhûh. Kairo: Maktabah al-Khâtiji, 1947.

Al-’Ash’ath. Sunan Abû Dawd. Vol. 4. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-’Aṣriyah, n.d.

Al-Asbahânî, Aḥmad bin Abd Allah. Halliyat Al-Awliyâ’ Wa Ṭabaqât Al-Asfiyâ’. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dâr al-Kitâb al-Arabi, n.d.

Al-Attas, Muhammad Nuqaib. The Mysticism of Hamzah Fansuri. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1970.

Al-Hajjaj, Muslim bin. Ṣaḥîḥ Muslim. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dâr Iḥyâ’ al-Turâth al-’Arâbî, n.d.

Al-Jawzî, Abd al-Raḥman bin ’Ali. Kashf Al-Mushkil Min ḥadîth Al-Ṣaḥiḥ. Vol. 2. Riyâḍ: Dâr al-Waṭn, n.d.

Al-Kalâbâdhî, Muḥammad bin Isḥâq. Kitâb Al-Ta’arruf Li Madhhab Ahl Al-Tasawuf. Kairo: al-Khâniji, 1994.

Al-Marwazî, Abû al-Muẓaffar. Manâqib Al-Ṣufiyah. Teheran, 1326.

Al-Qârî, Ali bin Muḥammad. Muraqâh Al-Mafâtîh Sharḥ Mishkâh Al-Maṣabîḥ. Vol. 8. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 2002.

Al-Qushayrî, Abû al-Qâsim. Al-Risâlah Al-Qushayriyah. Kairo: Muassasah Dâr al-Shu’b, 1989.

Al-Sahrawardî, Shihâb al-Dîn ’Umar. Awârif Al-Ma’arif. Vol. 1. Kairo: Maktabah al-Thaqafah al-Diniyah, 2006.

Al-Ṭusî, Abû Naṣr al-Sirâj. Al-Lumâ’. Mesir: Dâr al-Kitâb al-Hadithah, 1960.

Al-Tirmidhi, Muḥammad bin ’Isa. Sunan Al-Tirmidhi. Vol. 4. Mesir: Muṣṭafâ al-Bâb al-ḥalabî, 1975.

Ali, Nur bin. Al-Tasawuf Al-Islamî. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, 2000.

Anas, Mâlik bin. Al-Muwaṭṭâ’. Vol. 5. Abu Dabi: Mu’assasah Zayd bin Sulṭân, 2004.

Arafat, Ahmad Tajuddin. “Interaksi Kaum Sufi Dengan Ahli Hadis: Melacak Akar Persinggungan Tasawuf Dan Hadis.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 2, no. 2 (November 15, 2017): 129–55. https://doi.org/10.21580/JISH.22.2520.

Arberry, A.J. Pasang-Surut Ajaran Tasawuf. Bandung: Mizan, 1985.

Buchler, Arthur Frank. “Modes of Sufi Transmission to New Zealand.” New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 8, no. 2 (2006).

Danesi, Marcel. Pesan, Tanda, Dan Makna: Buku Teks Dasar Mengenai Semiotika Dan Teori Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2010.

Gibb, H.A.R. Mohammedanism: An Historical Survey. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.

Hadi, Abdul. “Hamzah Fansuri: Bapak Sastra Dan Bahasa Melayu.” In Hamzah Fanzuri: Penyair Sufi Aceh. Aceh: Lotkala, n.d.

Hamka. Perkembangan Dan Pemurnian Tasawuf: Dari Masa Nabi Muhammad Hingga Sufi-Sufi Besar. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Abdi Bangsa, 2016.

Hanbal, Aḥmad bin Muḥammad bin. Musnad Al-Imâm Aḥmad Bin Hanbal. Vol. 31. Bairut: Muassasah al-Risâlah, 2001.

Hasmy, A. “Hamzah Fansuri: Sastrawan Sufi Abad XVII.” In Hamzah Fanzuri: Penyair Sufi Aceh, edited by Abdul Hadi and L.K. Ara. Aceh: Lotkala, n.d.

Ibn Mâjah, Muḥammad bin Yazîd. Sunan Ibn Mâjah. Vol. 2. Beirut: Dâr Iḥyâ’ al-Kutub al-’Arabiyah, n.d.

Imron, Ali. Semiotika Al-Qur’an: Metode Dan Aplikasi Terhadap Kitab Nabi Yusuf. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2011.

Khaldûn, Ibn. Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldûn. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, n.d.

KUDHORI, MUHAMMAD. “Metode Kashf Dalam Penilaian Hadis: Studi Tashih Hadis Di Kalangan Kaum Sufi.” Afkaruna 14, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2018.0079.27-48.

Kurdi, Muliadi. Aceh Di Mata Sejarawan: Rekonstruksi Sejarah Sosial. Aceh: Lembaga Kajian Agama dan Sosial, 2009.

Lestari, Lenni. “EPISTEMOLOGI CORAK TAFSIR SUFISTIK.” SYAHADAH 2, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.32520/SYHD.V2I1.33.

Maḥmûd, Abd al-ḥalîm. Abḥâth Fî Al-Tasawuf. Libanon: Dâr al-Kitâb al-Libanânî, 1979.

Nasr, Sayyed Hossein. Islam, Religion, History and Civilization. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 2003.

Nicholson, Reynold A. The Mystics of Islam. London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd., 1914.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Letter to Lady Viola Welby.” In Critical Theory Since 1965. Florida: University Presses of Florida, 1986.

———. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover Publications,INC., 1955.

Prdopo, Rachmat Djoko. Beberapa Teori Sastra: Metode, Kritik Dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1995.

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam. Bandung: Pustaka, 2010.

Sari, Yulya. “Konsep Wahdatul Wujud Dalam Pemikiran Hamzah Fansuri.” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2019.

Schimmel, Annemarie. Mystical Dimensions of Islam. Carolina: The University of South Carolina Press, 1975.

Shauq, Maḥmûd Aḥmad. Al-Ittijahât Al-Hadîthah Fî Takhṭiṭ Al-Manâhij Al-Dirâsah Fî ḍau’ Al-Tawjîhât Al-Islâmiyah. Bairut: Dâr al-Fikr, 2001.

Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. Metodologi Syarah Hadis Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia, 2017.

Sya’roni, Usman. Otentisitas Hadis Menurut Ahli Hadis Dan Kaum Sufi. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2008.

Wazir, Rosni. “Hadis Dan Tasawuf: Satu Sorotan Terhadap Sharḥ Al-Taftāzānī ‘Alā Aḥādīth Al-Arba‘Īn Al-Nawawiyyah.” Hadis 8, no. 15 (2018).

Downloads

Published

30-01-2020

How to Cite

Ahsin, M., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2020). INTERPRETASI SUFISTIK ATAS HADIS MELALUI SASTRA DALAM SYAIR PERAHU KARYA HAMZAH FANSURI. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 21(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-10

Issue

Section

Articles