EFEKTIVITAS OPAC SEBAGAI SARANA TEMU KEMBALI INFORMASI DI UPT PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAGELANG (UNIMMA)

Rizki Shofak Isnaini, Jamzanah Wahyu Widayati

Abstract


Evaluation of information retrieval tool is very important to find out how far the retrieval system has worked. This study evaluates the OPAC of Muhammadiyah University of Magelang (UNIMMA) by determining the effectiveness of the information retrieval system seen from the relevance of the data displayed with the data requested by the user. This is descriptive quantitative research that calculates the value of recall and precision, while the data collection is conducted through literature studies and documentation. Based on the data collected, it can be concluded that OPAC UNIMMA is in the effective category with a high level of precision, and in the value range of 0.68 - 1.00 with recall and precision values respectively 0.77 or 77% and 0.84 or 84%. However, from the observations on each class number, it is found that the class number has a higher recall value than the precision, ie: the class numbers of 200, 800, and 900.


Keywords


information retrieval; OPAC; recall; precision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Indonesia. (n.d.). KBBI Daring. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/evaluasi

Indonesia. (n.d.). Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from https://www.perpusnas.go.id/dictionary.php?lang=id&id=Istilah Perpustakaan

Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang perpustakaan. Sekretariat Negara.

Juniarso, E., & Krismayani, I. (2018). Efektivitas OPAC sebagai sarana temu kembali informasi oleh pemustaka di UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan 7(3), 121-130. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/22925

Lasa-Hs, & Suciati, U. (2017). Kamus kepustakawanan indonesia. Calpulis.

Mirzaqon, A. T., & Purwoko, B. (2018). Studi kepustakaan mengenai landasan teori dan praktik konseling expressive writing. Jurnal BK UNESA, 8(1). https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/253525-studi-kepustakaan-mengenai-landasan-teor-c084d5fa.pdf

Nugroho, F., Muljono, P., & Hermadi, I. (2017). Pengembangan online public access catalog (OPAC) berbasis android pada Perpustakaan UPN “Veteran” Jakarta. EDULIB Journal Of Information Science, 7(2). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edulib/article/view/9196/0

Pendit, P. L. (2017). Recall & precision. https://iperpin.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/recall-precision/

Riduan & Akdon. (2009). Rumus dan data dalam aplikasi statistika. Alfabeta.

Saufa, A. F., & Widayati, J. W. (2017). Evaluasi sistem temu kembali informasi OPAC Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS). Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 5(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v5i2a1

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulistyo-Basuki. (2018). Kamus ilmu perpustakaan dan sains informasi. Sagung Seto.

Suwarno, W. (2011). Perpustakaan dan buku: Wacana penulisan & penerbitan. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Yusuf, A. M. (2015). Metode Penelitian kuantitaif, kualitatif dan penelitian gabungan. Prenada Media Group.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2021.161.80-95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.







Fihris Office:

Faculty of Adab and Cultural Sciences Building, 3rd Floor
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Jl. Marsda Adisucipto Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
Telephone Number: +62-274-513949
e-mail: fihris@uin-suka.ac.id
http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/adab/FIHRIS
 

Creative Commons License

All Publications by Fihris: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
Indexed By : 
ImageImageImageImageImageImage