Publication Ethics

At the Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, we hold a steadfast commitment to upholding the highest ethical standards in publication. Our dedication aligns with the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and we actively contribute to fostering ethical practices across the scholarly publishing landscape.

Key Principles of Our Research and Publishing Ethics

Your research is welcome for submission under these conditions:

  • It is conducted with utmost rigour and integrity.
  • It is entirely original.
  • It has not been submitted or published elsewhere, except as detailed in our policies on preprints and conference papers.
  • It is free from libellous, defamatory, or unlawful content.
  • All necessary permissions for third-party material have been obtained.
  • Consent has been secured for any named individuals or entities.
  • Authorship is accurately represented, avoiding both ghost authorship and unearned authorship credits.

Should we discover a breach of these conditions post-publication, actions consistent with COPE guidelines may be taken, including retraction, withdrawal, & correction policy from our database, contingent upon the resolution of any legal proceedings or independent reviews.

Authorship Guidelines

Authorship disputes can detract from the integrity of your work. To prevent such issues:

  • Adhere to the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship.
  • Ensure all contributors meeting these criteria are listed as authors.
  • Acknowledge those not meeting these criteria in the acknowledgements section.

Generative AI and Authorship

Generative AI tools or Large Language Models (LLMs) cannot be credited as authors.
Any AI tool use in the writing process must be disclosed, accompanied by human oversight and accountability, and authors bear full responsibility for the content.

Use in Writing
AI tools may be used to improve readability and language but not to replace human judgment. Authors must carefully review the outputs, and any use of AI should be transparently disclosed in the manuscript.

Authorship
AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Authorship requires human accountability for accuracy, integrity, originality, and compliance with ethical guidelines.

Use in Research and Data Analysis
This policy refers to the writing process and does not regulate the use of AI tools for data analysis or insight generation. If AI tools are part of the research methods, their use must be described in detail in the methods section, including the name, version, and manufacturer of the tool.

Use in Figures, Images, and Artwork
AI tools cannot be used to create or alter figures, images, or artwork unless they are part of the research methods, which must be fully disclosed. Adjustments to brightness or contrast are acceptable if they do not obscure original information. Authors may be asked to provide raw images for editorial review.

Restrictions on Artwork
Graphical abstracts and artwork using AI are not permitted, except in cases such as cover art, where prior approval from the editor and publisher is required. Proper attribution and clearance of rights must be ensured.

Plagiarism and Research Misconduct

We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics. To ensure the originality of submissions, we utilize Crossref Similarity Check to identify potential plagiarism.

Any allegations of research misconduct, including but not limited to plagiarism, citation manipulation, and data falsification or fabrication, are handled in accordance with the COPE guidelines.

If misconduct is identified:

  1. The editorial team will investigate the matter thoroughly, ensuring due process and fairness.
  2. Authors may be asked to provide explanations, data, or clarifications.
  3. Actions such as retraction, withdrawal, & correction of concern will be issued if necessary.

We reserve the right to inform relevant institutions, funders, or third parties where misconduct is confirmed. Our approach is guided by principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity.

Conflict of Interest

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest to maintain transparency and trust in the research process.

Addressing Complaints and Disputes

We take complaints seriously and adhere to a structured process for resolution, respecting all parties involved and ensuring fairness according to COPE's recommendations.

At Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, we pledge to navigate ethical challenges with professionalism and dedication to the truth, ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. Our commitment to ethical publishing underpins every article we process, reflecting our contribution to advancing knowledge with honesty and respect.