Social-Relational Model dalam Undang-undang Penyandang Disabilitas
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the Law Number 8 year 2016 on the Persons with Disabilities using the Social-Relational Model of disability. The debates between Medical Model versus Social Model have developed through disability discourses in Indonesia. This research argues that the correlation between Medical Model and Social Model is not mutually exclusive, rather, it is relationally necessary. Social Relational Model influnce in the Law can be discussed within three subjects: the rights for education for the persons with disabilities, the rights for justice and legal protection, and the rights for health.
[Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas melalui pendekatan Sosial-Relational Model. Perdebatan antara Medical Model versus Social Model telah berkembang melalui diskursus diskursus disabilitas di Indonesia. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa terdapat hubungan interelasional antara perspektif Medical Model dan Social Model yang sebenarnya bukan bertolak belakang, melainkan saling melengkapi satu sama lain. Dalam penelitian ini, dibahas relevansi pendekatan Social Relational dalam beberapa tema antara lain hak atas pendidikan, hak atas keadilan dan perlindungan hukum, dan hak atas kesehatan.]
Downloads
Abstract Viewed = 1042 times
PDF downloaded = 3950 times
Article Details
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
American Psychological Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition). Arlington, American Psychiatric Association.
Anastasiou, D. and Kauffman, J.M. (2013) The Social Model of Disability: Dichotomy Between Impairment and Disability. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 38(4), 441-459.
Bury, M. (2000) On chronic illness and disability, in: C. E. Bird, H. Conrad & A. M. Fremont (Eds) Handbook of medical sociology (5th edn) (New Jersey, PA, Prentice Hall).
Crow, L. (1996) Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability. In: Morris, J. Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London, The Women’s Press. h.106-226.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI) (1997) Undang Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1997 Tentang Penyandang Cacat. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/86294/106379/F-1732108101/IDN86294%20Idn.pdf [Accessed 10 August 2016].
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI) (2011) Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomer 19 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (Konvensi Mengenai Hak-Hak Penyandang Disabilitas). Available from : http://jdih.ristekdikti.go.id/?q=system/files/perundangan/4019141909.pdf [Accessed 11 September 2016]
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI) (2016) Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Available from : http://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/1667.pdf [Accessed 10 August 2016].
Edwards, N. (2014) Disability Rights in Indonesia? Problem with Ratification of the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 15(1), 1-15.
Foucault, M. (2008) Psychiatric Power. New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
Ghai, A. (2002) Disabled Woman: An Excluded Agenda of Indian Feminism. Hypatia, 17(3), 49-66.
Greeenstein, A. (2016) Radical Inclusive Education: disability, teaching and struggle for liberation. Sussex, Routledge.
Grue, J. (2011) Discourse Analysis and Disability: Some Topics and Issues. Discourse & Society, 22(5), 532-546.
Haegele, J. A., Hodge, S. (2016) Disability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models. Quest, 68(2), h.193-206.
Human Right Watch (2016) Living in Hell: Abuses against people with psychosocial disabilities in Indonesia. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/indonesia0316web.pdf [Accessed 14 Sepetember 2016]
Ingstad, B. (2007) Seeing Disability and Human Rights in the Local Context: Bostwana Revisited. In: Ingstad, B. and Whyte, S. R. Disability in Local and Global Worlds. London, University of California Press Ltd. h.237-258.
Kurniawan, H. (2015) Kebutuhan Difabel Terhadap Aksesibilitas Peradilan yang Fair. Jurnal Difabel, 1(1), 19-37.
Kurniawan, H., Yulianto, M. J., Syafi’ie, M., Hartanto, G. S. N., Ali, M., and Riyadi, E. (2015) Aksesibilitas Peradilan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Yogyakarta, PUSHAM UII.
Kusumastuti, H., Pradanasari, R., and Ratnawati, A. (2013) The Problem of People with Disability in Indonesia and What Is Being Learned from the World Report on Disability. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 93(1), 63-67.
Lailiyah, A. (2015) Jika Pihak Sekolah Menolak Difabel. In: Salim, I., and Syafi’ie, M. (eds) Hidup dalam Kerentanan: Narasi Kecil Keluarga Difabel. Yogyakarta: SIGAB. h.126-146.
Meekhosa, H. (2011) Decolonising Disability: Thinking and Acting Globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667-682.
Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice – A Personal Politics of Disability. London: The Women’s Press.
Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement. London, The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Overboe, J. (2007) Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (The State of Exception). Canadian Review of Sociology, 44(2), 219-235.
Palmer, M. and Harley, D. (2012) Models and Measurement in Disability: An International Review. Health and Policy Planning, 27(5), 357-364.
Reindal, S. M. (2008) A Social Relational Model of Disability: A Theoretical Framework for Special Needs Education?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 135-146.
Ro’fah (2015) Mengurai Kompleksitas Kemiskinan Difabel. In: Salim, I., and Syafi’ie, M. (eds) Hidup dalam Kerentanan: Narasi Kecil Keluarga Difabel. Yogyakarta: SIGAB. h. 244-271.
Ro’fah (2015b) Teori Disabilitas: Sebuah Literature Review. Jurnal Difabel, 2(1), h.137-160.
Shakespeare, T. (1998) Choice and Rights: Eugenics, Genetics and Disability Equality. Disability & Society, 15(5), 665-681.
Soldatic, K. (2016) Postcolonial Reproductions: Disability, Indigeneity and the Formation of the White Masculine Settler State of Australia. In: Soldatic, K. and Grech, S. Disability and Colonialism: (Dis)encounters and Anxious Intersectionalities. London, Routledge. h. 53-68.
Suharto, S., Kuipers, H., Dorsett, H. 2016. Disability Terminology and the Emergence of Diffability in Indonesia. Disability & Society, 31(5), 693-712.
Syafi’ie, M. (2015) Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Diskriminatif Terhadap Difabel. Jurnal Difabel, 2(2), 161-174.
Thomas, C. (2004) How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches. Disability & Society. 19(6), h.569-583.
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability. London, Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
World Bank (2016) Disability Overview. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability/overview#1 [Accessed 11 September 2016]
World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) World Report on Disability. Geneva, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
Yulianto, M. J. (2011) Investigation on the Influence of the Disability Movement in Indonesia. Leipzig, VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.