Sinergi Pendampingan sebagai Modal Pembelajaran Pendidikan Inklusif di PKBM Yogyakarta
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studies on inclusive education in non-formal institutions such as PKBM (Center for Community Learning Activities) have not been widely carried out. Whereas PKBM also accepts students with various backgrounds. The inclusion of children with disabilities in the same learning environment with other children in PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta can show how inclusive education is practiced in non-formal institutions. Taking PKBM as a case study, this paper examines interesting practices that characterize PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta. Data were obtained from tutors, students, and parents. Through a synergy strategy of mentoring and flexibility of inclusive education curriculum, PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta has facilitated the practice of inclusive education for children with disabilities in informal education system.
Studi tentang pendidikan inklusif di lembaga nonformal seperti PKBM (Pusat Kegiatan Belajar masyarakat) belum banyak dilakukan. Padahal PKBM juga menerima peserta didik dengan berbagai ragam latar belakang. Bergabungnya anak berkebutuhan khusus dalam lingkungan belajar yang sama dengan anak-anak lain di PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta dapat menjadi bukti pendidikan inklusif yang mencakup lembaga formal dan nonformal. Menggunakan studi kasus, penelitian ini mengkaji praktik menarik yang menjadi ciri khas PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta. Data diperoleh dari tutor, peserta didik, dan orang tua. Melalui strategi sinergi pendampingan dan fleksibilitas kurikulum pendidikan inklusif, PKBM HSPG Homeschooling Yogyakarta telah memfasilitasi praktik pendidikan inklusif bagi anak dengan kebutuhan khusus maupun umum.
Downloads
Abstract Viewed = 620 times
PDF downloaded = 676 times
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
Anwar, Y., & Adang. (2017). Sosiologi untuk Universitas (Cetakan kedua). Refika Aditama.
Azis, F., Mukramin, S., & Risfaisal, R. (2021). Interaksi Sosial Anak Autis di Sekolah Inklusi (Studi Sosiologi Pada Sekolah Inklusi di Kota Makassar). Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.26618/equilibrium.v9i1.4365
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2006). From Them to Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education. Routledge.
Budiyanto. (2017). Pengantar Pendidikan Inklusif Berbasis Budaya Lokal. Prenadamedia Group.
Chairiyah, R. (2015). Gambaran Penerimaan Diri Ibu Tiri Yang Memiliki Anak Tunarungu. http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/48093
Elmubarok, Z. (2009). Membumikan Pendidikan Nilai: Mengumpulkan yang Terserak, Menyambung yang Terputus dan Menyatukan yang Tercerai (1 ed.). Alfabeta.
Fauziah, P. Y. (2020). Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Gunarhadi, G. (2001). Mengenal Pendekatan Inklusi dalam Pendidikan Luar Biasa. Rehabilitasi, 2(1), 63–68.
Hamalik, O. (2004). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Johnsen, B. H., & Skjorten, M. D. (Ed.). (2001). Education—Special Needs Education. Oslo Academic Press.
Kugelmass, J. W. (2004). The Inclusive School: Sustaining Equity and Standards (New ed. edition). Teachers College Press.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Bantam Books.
Liyawati, I. D. (2016). Praktik Inklusi Sosial Penanganan Korban Anak yang Dilacurkan (Ayla) di Surabaya. Paradigma, 4(3), Article 3. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id
Martono, N. (2019). Sekolah Inklusi sebagai Arena Kekerasan Simbolik. Sosiohumaniora, 21(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i2.18557
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program Evaluation Theory and Practice, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Guide (Second Edition,). The Guilford Press.
Nasichin. (2002). Perkembangan Pendidikan Luar Biasa Selama Masa Dasawarsa Terakhir dan Kebijakan Terbaru dalam PLB di Indonesia. Direktorat PLB Depdiknas.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
O’hanlon, C. (2003). Educational Inclusion as Action Research (1st edition). Open University Press.
Ryandono, M. N. H. (2018). Peran Pondok Pesantren dalam Pemberdayaan Sosial Ekonomi di Jawa Timur pada Abad ke-20. Mozaik Humaniora, 18(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v18i2.10934
Shea, T. M., & Beuer, A. M. (1997). Special Education a Social Systems Perspective (2nd Edition). Brown & Benchmark.
Simpson, D., Jackson, M., & Aycock, J. (2005). John Dewey and the Art of Teaching: Toward Reflective and Imaginative Practice. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452232386
Sugiarmin, M. (2010). Kontrovesi Hubungan Autisme dan Imunisasi Measles- Mumps-Rubella (MMR). 8.
Suyanto, B., & Sutinah. (2011). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Kencana.
United Nations Educational. (1998). Learning to Live Together in Peace and Harmony: Values Education for Peace, Human Rights, Democracy, and Sustainable Development for the Asia-Pacific Region. A UNESCO-APNIEVE Sourcebook for Teacher Education and Tertiary Level Education. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED440028
Zidjaly, N. A. (2015). Disability, Discourse and Technology: Agency and Inclusion in (Inter)action. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137519573