Advokasi Hak Penyandang Disabilitas sebagai Gerakan Sosial Baru di Kota Semarang.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the social action of Komunitas Sahabat Difabel (KSD) in advocating for the rights of persons with disabilities in Semarang. This research uses qualitative method. Data collection was conducted through interviews with disabled KSD members, KSD leaders, and the Semarang City Social Service. In addition, researchers also traced secondary data through the Semarang City BPS. The results of the research show that the social action carried out by Komunitas Sahabat Difabel (KSD) is a new social movement, because it carries humanitarian issues. In addition, in carrying out social actions, KSD uses the social media in providing education and disability awareness to the community. KSD also uses social networks in advocating for the rights of persons with disabilities in Semarang. The conclusion of this study is that KSD's social action in advocating the rights of persons with disabilities uses a strategy of mobilizing resources that are both tangible and intangible. It is hoped that this research can have a significant impact on increasing disability awareness and eliminating discrimination against disabilities.
Downloads
Abstract Viewed = 693 times
PDF downloaded = 639 times
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
Agusti, S. S. (2023). Aksi Sosial Gerakan untuk Kesejahteraan Tuna Rungu Indonesia Jakarta (GERKATIN Jakarta) terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Rungu. Jurnal Kommunity Online, 2(2), Article 2.
Andriani, N. S. (2017). Kebijakan Responsif Disabilitas: Pengarusutamaan Managemen Kebijakan di Level Daerah, Nasional dan Internasional. PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v9i1.2056
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. (2020). Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Jenis Kelamin (Jiwa), 2020-2022 [Pemerintah]. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. https://semarangkota.bps.go.id/indicator/12/78/1/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-jenis-kelamin.html
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. (2022). Jumlah Penyandang Cacat Menurut Kecamatan di Kabupaten Semarang 2022 [Pemerintah]. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. https://semarangkab.bps.go.id/indicator/27/635/1/jumlah-penyandang-cacat-menurut-kecamatan-di-kabupaten-semarang.html
Degener, T. (Ed.). (2000). International Disability Law - A New Legal Subject on the Rise: The Interregional Experts’ Meeting in Hong Kong, December 13-17, 1999. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 18(1), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383P9C
Gómez Bernal, V., & Roca, B. (2016). Disability, Social Movements and Radical Theory: An Anthropological Approach. Anthropological Notebooks, 22(2), 79–92.
Gunawan, F. R. (2014). Kamu Cacat Maka Aku Ada, Eksistensi Disabilitas dalam Budaya Normalitas. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Locher, D. A. (2002). Collective Behavior. Prentice Hall.
Manulu, D. (2016). Gerakan Sosial dan Perubahan Kebijakan Publik: Kasus Perlawanan Masyarakat Batak vs PT. Inti Indorayon Utama,di Porsea, Sumatera Utara. Populasi, 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.12066
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2005). Qualitative Data Analysis (Terjemahan). UI Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mutiah, A. A., & Astuti, P. (2018). Peran Komunitas Sahabat Difabel dalam Pemenuhan Hak Ketenagakerjaan Penyandang Difabel Kota Semarang. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 7(2), Article 2.
Pichardo, N. A. (1988). Resource Mobilization: An Analysis of Conflicting Theoretical Variations. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01245.x
Porta, D. della, & Diani, M. (2009). Social Movements: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Salim, A. (2006). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial: Buku Sumber untuk Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Kedua). PT Tiara Wacana.
Santoso, M. B., & Apsari, N. C. (2017). Pergeseran Paradigma dalam Disabilitas. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 1(2), 166–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v1n2.6.
Singh, R. (2001). Social Movements, Old and New: A Post-Modernist Critique. SAGE Publications.
Sukmana, O. (2013). Konvergensi Antara Resource Mobilizationtheory Dan Identityoriented Theorydalam Studi Gerakan Sosial Baru. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 8(1), 39–62.
Sukmana, O. (2016). Konsep dan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Intrans Publishing.
Tarrow, S. (1996). Social Movements in Contentious Politics: A Review Article. The American Political Science Review, 90(4), 874–883. https://doi.org/10.2307/2945851
Tempo.co. (2021, Oktober 1). Hak Aksesibilitas Kesehatan untuk Penyandang Disabilitas [Berita]. Article 33 Indonesia. https://article33.or.id/id/berita/tempo-co-hak-aksesibilitas-kesehatan-untuk-penyandang-disabilitas/#:~:text=Berdasarkan%20data%20Survei%20Sosial%2DEkonomi,atau%20sekitar%2026%20juta%20orang.
Ulfa, N. (2015). Gerakan Perempuan Penyandang Disabilitas:(Studi Mengenai Strategi Sentra Advokasi Permpuan Difabel dan Anak(SAPDA) dalam Memperjuangkan Eksistensi Perempuan Penyandang Disabilitas Di Daerah Istimewa Y [Skripsi, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/123265
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.