Difabel Berdaya Melepas Stigma Pengalaman PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur Membangun Partisipasi Warga dalam Program CSR Kampung Aren Berdaya Ramah Difabel
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Negative stigma towards difabled groups often hamperd community participation which requiered in creation of difabled-friendly environment . The study analyzes the success of Difabled Friendly Aren Village (KBRD) Program in mobilizing community participation to create inclusive environment. The study use qualitative research methods with descriptive approach within the framework analysis of induced participation. The study found that empowered Children with Special Needs (CSN) was able increasing communities' literacy regarding difabilities, eliminate the negative stigma towards CSN, and build the social capital between CSN and community. All of this simultaneously paves the way for increasing community participation in the program. Collaboration of multiple actors such as Permata Bunda Business Incubation (Inbis) (civil society), PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur (PKT) (private sector), and local government leader played privotal role in realization of the KBRD. The study confirms the sandwich movement concept and the twintrack model according to the biopsychosocial paradigm.
Stigma negatif terhadap kelompok difabel sering menghambat partisipasi masyarakat yang dibutuhkan dalam upaya mewujudkan lingkungan ramah difabel. Kajian ini menganalisis keberhasilan program Kampung Aren Ramah Difabel (KBRD) dalam menggalang partisipasi masyarakat mewujudkan lingkungan yang inklusif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif dalam kerangka analisis penumbuhan partisipasi. Studi ini menemukan bahwa keberdayaan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus (ABK) mampu meningkatkan literasi warga mengenai difabilitas, menghilangkan stigma negatif terhadap ABK, dan membangun modal sosial ABK dengan warga. Kesemuanya secara bersamaan membuka jalan untuk menumbuhkan partisipasi warga pada program KBRD. Kolaborasi aktor dari tiga sektor yaitu Inkubasi Bisnis (Inbis) Permata Bunda (masyarakat sipil), PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur (PKT) (sektor swasta), dan tokoh pemerintah lokal berperan penting dalam penumbuhan partisipasi warga membangun KBRD. Studi ini mengkonfirmasi konsep sandwich movement dan model twintrack sesuai paradigma biopsikososial.
Downloads
Abstract Viewed = 355 times
PDF downloaded = 311 times
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
* Author(s) are the copyrigth holder(s) of their published articles and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
References
Andriyani, N. (2020). Peningkatan Kesejahteraan yang Berkelanjutan bagi Penyandang Difabel Melalui Program P4-SEP di Inkubator Bisnis Permata Bunda.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Analisis Tematik Kependudukan Indonesia: Fertilitas Remaja, Kematian Maternal, Kematian Bayi, dan Penyandang Disabilitas (W. Winardi (ed.)). Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bath, B., Trask, C., McCrosky, J., & Lawson, J. (2014). A Biopsychosocial Profile of Adult Canadians with and without Chronic Back Disorders: A Population-Based Analysis of the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Surveys. Journal of Rural Health, 30(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12062
BPS. (2020). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat 2020: Kesempatan Penyandang Disabilitas Terhadap Pendidikan dan Pekerjaan.
Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. (2016). Disability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models. Quest, 68(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1143849
Handayani, W. (2020). Not All Disabilities Are Visible.
Heijnders, M., & Van Der Meij, S. (2006). The fight against stigma: an overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500600595327
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing Stigma Author ( s ): Bruce G . Link and Jo C . Phelan Source : Annual Review of Sociology , Vol . 27 ( 2001 ), pp . 363-385 Published by : Annual Reviews Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678626 Accessed : 03-03-2016 10 : 51 UTC Yo. 27(2001), 363–385.
LPEM FEB UI. (2017). Memetakan Penyandang Disabilitas (PD) di Pasar Tenaga Kerja Indonesia. http://www.oit.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_587668.pdf
Maftuhin, A. (2016). Mengikat Makna Diskriminasi: Penyandang Cacat, Difabel, dan Penyandang Disabilitas. Inklusi, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030201
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Can Participation be Induced? Some evidence from Developing Countries. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(2), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757918
Meyers, S. J. (2014). The Social Model of Disability Under the Shadow of the Revolution: Ex-combatants Negotiating Identity in Nicaragua. Qualitative Sociology, 37(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9284-x
Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41(SUPPL. 1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
Petasis, A. (2019). Discrepancies of the Medical , Social and Biopsychosocial Models of Disability ; A Comprehensive Theoretical Framework. 3(4), 42–54.
PKT. (2019). Pemberdayaan Disabilitas dan Penciptaan Lingkungan Inklusif.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas (Vol. 8).
Rerief, M., & Letšosa, R. (2018). Models of disability : A brief overview The medical model : Disability as a disease. Theological Studies, 74(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/hts.v74i1.4738%0A
Santoso, M. B., & Apsari, N. C. (2017). Pergeseran Paradigma dalam Disabilitas. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 1(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v1n2.6
Smeltzer, S. C. (2007). Improving the health and wellness of persons with disabilities: A call to action too important for nursing to ignore. Nursing Outlook, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.04.001
Smythe, T., Adelson, J. D., & Polack, S. (2020). Systematic review of interventions for reducing stigma experienced by children with disabilities and their families in low- and middle-income countries: state of the evidence. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 25(5), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13388
Social Development Studies Center. (2020). Laporan Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Program Sustainable Entrepreneurship Programs for Disabilities PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur.
Social Development Studies Center. (2021). Laporan Studi Social Return On Investment Program CSR BUDIMAN OKE DAN Sustainable Entrepreneurship Program for Disability PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur 2021.
Suharto, S., Kuipers, P., & Dorsett, P. (2016). Disability terminology and the emergence of ‘diffability’ in Indonesia. Disability and Society, 31(5), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1200014
UNICEF. (2023). Key issues for children with disabilities in Indonesia. 1–23. www.unicef.org/indonesia/reports/key-is-
Van Brakel, W. H., Cataldo, J., Grover, S., Kohrt, B. A., Nyblade, L., Stockton, M., Wouters, E., & Yang, L. H. (2019). Out of the silos: Identifying cross-cutting features of health-related stigma to advance measurement and intervention. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1245-x
Weiss, M. G. (2008). Stigma and the social burden of neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000237
WHO. (2011). World Report On Disability. World Health, 1–24. www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html%0Ahttp://www.larchetoronto.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/launch-of-World-Report-on-Disability-Jan-27-121.pdf
Winance, M. (2016). Rethinking disability: Lessons from the past, questions for the future. Contributions and limits of the social model, the sociology of science and technology, and the ethics of care. Alter, 10(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.005
Yeo, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: “nothing about us, without us.” World Development, 31(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00218-8