A Full-Profile Conjoint Analysis to Identify University Students’ Preferences Toward Food Delivery Services

A Case Study of the Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Epha Diana Supandi (SCOPUS ID: 57188993497) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
  • Fitri Rochmiyani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jiehis.5592

Keywords:

Conjoint analysis, Full-profile design, Consumer Preference, Food delivery Service

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has transformed consumer behavior, particularly in fulfilling food needs through online food delivery services. University students represent one of the most active user groups due to their high mobility and preference for practical lifestyles. This study aims to analyze students’ preferences toward food delivery service attributes and to identify the most influential factors in determining their choices. The research involved 100 respondents from the Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, using the traditional conjoint analysis method with a full-profile design approach. Six attributes were examined: type of service, price, payment method, courier service, food quality, and service quality. The results indicate that price has the highest level of importance (25.401%), followed by type of service (22.230%), service quality (16.231%), courier service (15.926%), payment method (10.960%), and food quality (9.252%). The most preferred combination of attributes includes GrabFood or GoFood services with promotional prices, uniformed couriers, diverse food options, and fast delivery. These findings suggest that promotional pricing strategies and service quality improvements are key factors for online food delivery providers to enhance customer satisfaction and attract student users.

Author Biography

  • Epha Diana Supandi, (SCOPUS ID: 57188993497) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

References

Arianto, M., Sukarsa, I. K. G., & Srinandi, I. G. A. M. (2024). Full-profile conjoint analysis to determine consumer preferences for shoe products. Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM), 4(5), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.36312/10.36312/vol5iss5pp221-227

Aryatinigrum, S., Wulandari, S., & Insyirah, A. I. (2020). The effect of price discounts on consumer loyalty among online marketplace users. Journal of Management Science, 8(3), 946–953.

Campbell, D., Totuka, M., & Upadhyay, C. K. (2023). Attributes influencing consumer perception towards online food ordering in Rajasthan, India. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Business & Management (ICETBM 2023), Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 10.2991/978-94-6463-162-3_6

Fadilla, L. O., & Cahyadi, E. R. (2022). Competition among digital food delivery platforms in DKI Jakarta Province. Journal of Management and Business Applications, 8(3), 973–984. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.8.3.973

Hair, J. R. A., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed., p. 758). Cengage.

Jakaria, R. B., Kurniawab, S., Syaifudin, M. R., & Pamuji, P. S. (2024). Designing 19-liter gallon packaging attributes using the conjoint method. Scientica: Journal of Science and Technology, 2(10), 205–211.

Jauza, S. R. R., & Prastawa, H. (2024). Consumer design preferences for iPhone smartphone product attributes using conjoint analysis. Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 14(1), 1–7.

Kartono, R., & Tjahjadi, J. K. (2021). Factors affecting consumers’ intentions to use online food delivery services during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Jabodetabek area. The Winners Journal, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v22i1.6822

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Nurdiansah, A., & Widyastuti. (2022). The effect of price discounts on customer satisfaction and repurchase intention (a study on ShopeeFood users). Sibatik Journal, 1(8), 1495–1514. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i8.198

Park, S.-J. (2023). Understanding customer preferences of delivery services for online grocery retailing in South Korea. Sustainability, 15(5), 4650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054650

Persada, S. F., Prasetyo, Y. T., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2024). Indonesia consumer preferences on attributes of marketplace platform: A conjoint analysis approach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2361868. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2361868%0A

Restuputri, D. P., Fridawati, A., & Masudin, I. (2022). Customer perception on last-mile delivery services using Kansei engineering and conjoint analysis: A case study of Indonesian logistics providers. Logistics, 6(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020029

Simamora, B. (2005). Multivariate marketing analysis. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Suci, W., & Sari, F. M. (2019). Application of conjoint analysis to determine preferences of Padang city residents toward use of online services in 2019. Journal of Statistics, 7(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.26714/jsunimus.7.2.2019.%25p

Supandi, E. D. (2012). A conjoint analysis approach to measure student preferences for academic information system services at UIN Yogyakarta. Fourier Journal: Journal of Mathematics and Learning, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14421/fourier.2012.11.1-9

Supranto, J. (2010). Multivariate analysis: Meaning and interpretation. Rineka Cipta.

Sumrit, D. (2024). Examining the impact of online food delivery services attributes on customer loyalty through a conjoint analysis approach: A case study of Bangkok, Thailand. International Journal of Value Chain Management (IJVCM), 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvcm.2024.10065323

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

A Full-Profile Conjoint Analysis to Identify University Students’ Preferences Toward Food Delivery Services: A Case Study of the Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. (2025). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Halal Industries, 6(2), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiehis.5592

Similar Articles

11-20 of 60

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.