Politik Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Membatalkan Konsep Empat Pilar sebagai Upaya Mendudukkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara

Authors

  • Udiyo Basuki Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v4i2.1993

Abstract

This paper is the result of research that has been overshadowed by the study
authors theoretical and empirical, that Pancasila is the basis of the state and a source of
law as stated in the Preamble to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year
1945 fourth paragraph. In the system of legislation, Pancasila is the basic norm
(staatsfundamental), successive later verfassungnorm 1945, grundgezetznorm or MPR
decrees, as well as gezetznorm or the Act. But in reality, the Pancasila likened his
position and aligned with the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary Republic of Indonesia,
Unity which was then called the "Four Pillars of Nation and State". Results penilitian
found that the political law of the Constitutional Court makes a decision positive
Legislature in Constitutional Court Decision No. 100 / PUU-XI / 2012, is part of
the authority of the Constitutional Court that has 4 (four) authority and one (1) the
obligations as set forth in Article 24C paragraph (1) and (2) 1945. In addition to a
state institution guardian of democracy (the guardian of democracy) the Constitutional
Court as well as the protector of the state and legal sources. To support the political law,
the Constitutional Court did various things, including the technical organization of the
trial. Position Pancasila as the state after the aborted phrase "four pillars of the state
and nation is" back Pancasila as the state not as the pillars of the nation as stated in
the fourth paragraph of the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution

Author Biography

  • Udiyo Basuki, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
    SUPREMASI HUKUM merupakan jurnal ilmiah dan media komunikasi ilmiah antar peminat ilmu hukum.

References

A.A.G. Peters dan Koesriani Siswosoebroto, Hukum dan Perkembangan

Sosial Buku Teks Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1988.

Ali Safaat, Pembubaran Partai Politik Di Indonesia (Analisis Pengaturan Hukum

dan Praktik Pembubaran Partai Politik 1959 – 2004), Jakarta: Grafindo,

Alvitri, Ideologi Welfare State dalam Dasar Negara Indonesia:

Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Jaminan

Sosial Nasional dalam JURNAL KONSTITUSI Volume 9 Nomor

2012, hal. 454.

Anis Ibrahim, “Legislasi dalam Perspektif Demokrasi: Analisis Interaksi

Politik Dan Hukum dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah

di Jawa Timur”, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas

Diponegoro, Semarang: 2008.

As’ad Said Ali, Negara Pancasila Jalan Kemaslahatan Bangsa, Jakarta: LP3ES,

Azhary, Negara Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis Normatif tentang UnsurUnsurnya, Jakarta: UI Press, 1995.

Bahder Johan Nasution, Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Bandung:

Mandar Maju, 2012.

Bernard Arief Sidharta, Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum, Sebuah

Penelitian

tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai

Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Bandung:

Mandar Maju, 2007.

Bonita J. Campbell, Understanding Information System, Foundation of Control,

New Delhi: Prentice-hall of India, 1979.

Dekrit Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 1960 tentang Pembubaran Dewan

Perwakilan Rakyat.

Dwi Siswoyo, “Membangun Konstruk Filosofi Pendidikan Nasional

Pancasila”, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri

Yogyakarta, Semarang: 2013.

Eddy Asnawi, “Relevansi Politik Hukum dan Strategi Pembangunan

Hukum Dalam Rangka Menuju Sistem Hukum Nasional”, Jurnal

Hukum Respublika Vol. 3 No. 1, Tahun 2003.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-30

How to Cite

Basuki, U. (2015). Politik Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Membatalkan Konsep Empat Pilar sebagai Upaya Mendudukkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v4i2.1993